(In practice they don't exist, but so long as we're making changes for
standards compliance...)
Also add several more unit tests for good and bad URL types.
Use the generic function for both the ControlPort cookie and the
ExtORPort cookie.
Also, place the global cookie variables in the heap so that we can
pass them around more easily as pointers.
Also also, fix the unit tests that broke by this change.
Conflicts:
src/or/config.h
src/or/ext_orport.c
Incidentally, this business here where I make crypto_rand mockable:
this is exactly the kind of thing that would make me never want to
include test-support stuff in production builds.
No other changes were made here. Keeping everything in
src/test/test.c was a legacy of back when we had all our unit tests in
one big file.
Doing this now because I'm adding an ext_or_command test.
I added this so I could write a unit test for ServerTransportOptions,
but it incidentally exercises the succeed-on-defaults case of
options_validate too.
Better tests for upper bounds, and for failing cases.
Also, change the function's interface to take a buffer length rather
than a maximum length, and then NUL-terminate: functions that don't
NUL-terminate are trouble waiting to happen.
The only thing that used format_helper_exit_status on win32 was the
unit tests. This caused an error when we tried to leave a static
format_helper_exit_status lying around in a production object file.
The easiest solution is to admit that this way of dealing with process
exit status is Unix-only.
If you pass the --enable-coverage flag on the command line, we build
our testing binaries with appropriate options eo enable coverage
testing. We also build a "tor-cov" binary that has coverage enabled,
for integration tests.
On recent OSX versions, test coverage only works with clang, not gcc.
So we warn about that.
Also add a contrib/coverage script to actually run gcov with the
appropriate options to generate useful .gcov files. (Thanks to
automake, the .o files will not have the names that gcov expects to
find.)
Also, remove generated gcda and gcno files on clean.
We previously used FILENAME_PRIVATE identifiers mostly for
identifiers exposed only to the unit tests... but also for
identifiers exposed to the benchmarker, and sometimes for
identifiers exposed to a similar module, and occasionally for no
really good reason at all.
Now, we use FILENAME_PRIVATE identifiers for identifiers shared by
Tor and the unit tests. They should be defined static when we
aren't building the unit test, and globally visible otherwise. (The
STATIC macro will keep us honest here.)
For identifiers used only by the unit tests and never by Tor at all,
on the other hand, we wrap them in #ifdef TOR_UNIT_TESTS.
This is not the motivating use case for the split test/non-test
build system; it's just a test example to see how it works, and to
take a chance to clean up the code a little.
This is mainly a matter of automake trickery: we build each static
library in two versions now: one with the TOR_UNIT_TESTS macro
defined, and one without. When TOR_UNIT_TESTS is defined, we can
enable mocking and expose more functions. When it's not defined, we
can lock the binary down more.
The alternatives would be to have alternate build modes: a "testing
configuration" for building the libraries with test support, and a
"production configuration" for building them without. I don't favor
that approach, since I think it would mean more people runnning
binaries build for testing, or more people not running unit tests.
Is it possible that *every* attempt to replace the microdesc cache on
windows 7 is going to fail because of our lack of FILE_SHARE_DELETE
while opening the file? If so, this test will catch #2077 and let us
know when it's fixed.
This is a fix for bug 8844, where eugenis correctly notes that there's
a sentinel value at the end of the list-of-freelists that's never
actually checked. It's a bug since the first version of the chunked
buffer code back in 0.2.0.16-alpha.
This would probably be a crash bug if it ever happens, but nobody's
ever reported something like this, so I'm unsure whether it can occur.
It would require write_to_buf, write_to_buf_zlib, read_to_buf, or
read_to_buf_tls to get an input size of more than 32K. Still, it's a
good idea to fix this kind of thing!
