A new set of unit test cases are provided, as well as introducing
an alternative paradigm and macros to support it. Primarily, each test
case is given its own namespace, in order to isolate tests from each
other. We do this by in the usual fashion, by appending module and
submodule names to our symbols. New macros assist by reducing friction
for this and other tasks, like overriding a function in the global
namespace with one in the current namespace, or declaring integer
variables to assist tracking how many times a mock has been called.
A set of tests for a small-scale module has been included in this
commit, in order to highlight how the paradigm can be used. This
suite gives 100% coverage to status.c in test execution.
Back in 175b2678, we allowed servers to recognize clients who are
telling them the truth about their ciphersuites, and select the best
cipher from on that list. This implemented the server side of proposal
198.
In bugs 11492, 11498, and 11499, cypherpunks found a bunch of mistakes
and omissions and typos in the UNRESTRICTED_SERVER_CIPHER_LIST we had.
In #11513, I found a couple more.
Rather than try to hand-edit this list, I wrote a short python script
to generate our ciphersuite preferences from the openssl headers.
The new rules are:
* Require forward secrecy.
* Require RSA (since our servers only configure RSA keys)
* Require AES or 3DES. (This means, reject RC4, DES, SEED, CAMELLIA,
and NULL.)
* No export ciphersuites.
Then:
* Prefer AES to 3DES.
* If both suites have the same cipher, prefer ECDHE to DHE.
* If both suites have the same DHE group type, prefer GCM to CBC.
* If both suites have the same cipher mode, prefer SHA384 to SHA256
to SHA1.
* If both suites have the same digest, prefer AES256 to AES128.
This involves some duplicate code between backtrace.c and sandbox.c,
but I don't see a way around it: calling more functions would mean
adding more steps to our call stack, and running clean_backtrace()
against the wrong point on the stack.
When we successfully create a usable circuit after it previously
timed out for a certain amount of time, we should make sure that
our public IP address hasn't changed and update our descriptor.
The major changes are to re-order some ciphers, to drop the ECDH suites
(note: *not* ECDHE: ECDHE is still there), to kill off some made-up
stuff (like the SSL_RSA_FIPS_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA suite), to drop
some of the DSS suites... *and* to enable the ECDHE+GCM ciphersuites.
This change is autogenerated by get_mozilla_ciphers.py from
Firefox 28 and OpenSSL 1.0.1g.
Resolves ticket 11438.
In C, it's a bad idea to do this:
char *cp = array;
char *end = array + array_len;
/* .... */
if (cp + 3 >= end) { /* out of bounds */ }
because cp+3 might be more than one off the end of the array, and
you are only allowed to construct pointers to the array elements,
and to an element one past the end. Instead you have to say
if (cp - array + 3 >= array_len) { /* ... */ }
or something like that.
This patch fixes two of these: one in process_versions_cell
introduced in 0.2.0.10-alpha, and one in process_certs_cell
introduced in 0.2.3.6-alpha. These are both tracked under bug
10363. "bobnomnom" found and reported both. See also 10313.
In our code, this is likely to be a problem as we used it only if we
get a nasty allocator that makes allocations end close to (void*)-1.
But it's best not to have to worry about such things at all, so
let's just fix all of these we can find.
Found by testing with chutney. The old behavior was "fail an
assertion", which obviously isn't optimal.
Bugfix on 8b9a2cb68b290e550695124d7ef0511225b451d5; bug not in any
released version.
Also, stop accepting the old kind of RESOLVED cells with no TTL
fields; they haven't been sent since 0.1.1.6-alpha.
This patch won't work without the fix to #10468 -- it will break
DNSPorts unless they set the proper ipv4/6 flags on entry_connection_t.
Otherwise, it could mung the thing that came over the net on windows,
which would defeat the purpose of recording the unparseable thing.
Fixes bug 11342; bugfix on 0.2.2.1-alpha.
This is a fix for 9963. I say this is a feature, but if it's a
bugfix, it's a bugfix on 0.2.4.18-rc.
Old behavior:
Mar 27 11:02:19.000 [notice] Bootstrapped 50%: Loading relay descriptors.
Mar 27 11:02:20.000 [notice] Bootstrapped 51%: Loading relay descriptors.
Mar 27 11:02:20.000 [notice] Bootstrapped 52%: Loading relay descriptors.
... [Many lines omitted] ...
Mar 27 11:02:29.000 [notice] Bootstrapped 78%: Loading relay descriptors.
Mar 27 11:02:33.000 [notice] We now have enough directory information to build circuits.
New behavior:
Mar 27 11:16:17.000 [notice] Bootstrapped 50%: Loading relay descriptors
Mar 27 11:16:19.000 [notice] Bootstrapped 55%: Loading relay descriptors
Mar 27 11:16:21.000 [notice] Bootstrapped 60%: Loading relay descriptors
Mar 27 11:16:21.000 [notice] Bootstrapped 65%: Loading relay descriptors
Mar 27 11:16:21.000 [notice] Bootstrapped 70%: Loading relay descriptors
Mar 27 11:16:21.000 [notice] Bootstrapped 75%: Loading relay descriptors
Mar 27 11:16:21.000 [notice] We now have enough directory information to build circuits.
Most of these are simple. The only nontrivial part is that our
pattern for using ENUM_BF was confusing doxygen by making declarations
that didn't look like declarations.
In circuitlist_free_all, we free all the circuits, removing them from
the map as we go, but we weren't actually freeing the placeholder
entries that we use to indicate pending DESTROY cells.
Fix for bug 11278; bugfix on the 7912 code that was merged in
0.2.5.1-alpha
There are still quite a few 0.2.3.2x relays running for x<5, and while I
agree they should upgrade, I don't think cutting them out of the network
is a net win on either side.
