Because it invokes the Tor mainloop, it does unpredictable things to
test coverage of a lot of code that it doesn't actually test at
all. (It is more an integration test than anything else.)
In "make test-network-all", test IPv6-only v3 single onion services,
using the chutney network single-onion-v23-ipv6-md. This test will
not pass until 23588 has been merged.
Closes ticket 27251.
This "publish/subscribe" layer sits on top of lib/dispatch, and
tries to provide more type-safety and cross-checking for the
lower-level layer.
Even with this commit, we're still not done: more checking will come
in the next commit, and a set of usability/typesafety macros will
come after.
This module implements a way to send messages from one module to
another, with associated data types. It does not yet do anything to
ensure that messages are correct, that types match, or that other
forms of consistency are preserved.
This project introduces the prob_distr.c subsystem which implements all the
probability distributions that WTF-PAD needs. It also adds unittests for all of
them.
Code and tests courtesy of Riastradh.
Co-authored-by: Taylor R Campbell <campbell+tor@mumble.net>
Co-authored-by: Mike Perry <mikeperry-git@torproject.org>
This patch adds test cases for process_t which uses Tor's main loop.
This allows us to test that the callbacks are actually invoked by the
main loop when we expect them.
See: https://bugs.torproject.org/28179
This patch adds a new Process subsystem for running external programs in
the background of Tor. The design is focused around a new type named
`process_t` which have an API that allows the developer to easily write
code that interacts with the given child process. These interactions
includes:
- Easy API for writing output to the child process's standard input
handle.
- Receive callbacks whenever the child has output on either its standard
output or standard error handles.
- Receive callback when the child process terminates.
We also support two different "protocols" for handling output from the
child process. The default protocol is the "line" protocol where the
process output callbacks will be invoked only when there is complete
lines (either "\r\n" or "\n" terminated). We also support the "raw"
protocol where the read callbacks will get whatever the operating system
delivered to us in a single read operation.
This patch does not include any operating system backends, but the Unix
and Windows backends will be included in separate commits.
See: https://bugs.torproject.org/28179
Additionally, use it to test that is_staledesc is set correctly.
Eventually we'll want to test all the other flags, but I'm aiming
for only adding coverage on the changed code here.
This is no longer necessary with upstream rust-lang/rust changes as well
as some local tweaks. Namely:
* The `-fsanitize=address`-style options are now passed via `-C
link-args` through `RUSTFLAGS`. This obviates the need for the shell
script.
* The `-C default-linker-libraries`, disabling `-nodefaultlibs`, is
passed through `RUSTFLAGS`, which is necessary to ensure that
`-fsanitize=address` links correctly.
* The `-C linker` option is passed to ensure we're using the same C
compiler as normal C code, although it has a bit of hackery to only
get the `gcc` out of `gcc -std=c99`
No behaviour change.
A previous fix to chutney removed v3 onion services from the
mixed+hs-v23 network, so seeing "mixed+hs-v23" in tests is
confusing.
Fixes bug 27345; bugfix on 0.3.2.1-alpha.
We used to link both libraries at once, but now that I'm working on
TLS, there's nothing left to keep OpenSSL around for when NSS is
enabled.
Note that this patch causes a couple of places that still assumed
OpenSSL to be disabled when NSS is enabled
- tor-gencert
- pbkdf2
Also, add a stubbed-out nss version of the modules. The tests won't
pass with NSS yet since the NSS modules don't do anything.
This is a good patch to read with --color-moved.
This is meant for use when encrypting the current time within the
period in order to get a monotonically increasing revision counter
without actually revealing our view of the time.
This scheme is far from the most state-of-the-art: don't use it for
anything else without careful analysis by somebody much smarter than
I am.
See ticket #25552 for some rationale for this logic.
