There is probably no code that can write the 2 bytes at the end of the
packed_cell_t when the cell is only a 512-byte cell, but let's not get
overconfident there.
Instead of warning about low ports that are advertised, we should have
been warning about low ports that we're listening on. Bug 7285, fix
on 0.2.3.9-alpha.
That's not where I'd want to put a $, but apparently the other
foo/id/<identity> things allow it, as does an arguably valid
interpretation of control-spec.txt. So let's be consistent.
Fix for a piece of bug 7059.
This is part of what's needed to build without warnings on mingw64:
it was warning about the cast from void* to long that happened in
the places we were using test_{n,}eq on pointers.
The alternative here would have been to broaden tt_int_op to accept
a long long or an intptr_t, but that's less correct (since pointers
aren't integers), and would hurt the portability of tinytest a
little.
Fixes part of 7260.
This is based on code by yayooo for 7260, but:
- It allows for SIZEOF_PID_T == SIZEOF_SHORT
- It addresses some additional cases where we weren't getting any
warnings only because we were casting pid_t to int.
We still want to build on compilers w/o c99 support, such as
(notoriously, shamefully) MSVC.
So I'm commenting out the designated initializers in
circuitmux_ewma.c. The alternative would have been to use some kind
of macros to use designated initializers only when they're
supported, but that's error-prone, and can lead to code having
different meanings under different compilers.
Bug 7286; fix on 0.2.4.4-alpha; spotted by Gisle Vanem.
When configuring tor without upnp support, ie ./configure --disable-upnp,
tor-fw-helper fails to link with undefined references to `ceil' and
`log'. This if fixed by linking to libm.
X-Gentoo-Bug: 435040
X-Gentoo-Bug-URL: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435040
Reported-by: Alexandre <alexandre.cortes@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: Anthony G. Basile <blueness@gentoo.org>
If we completed the handshake for the v2 link protocol but wound up
negotiating the wong protocol version, we'd become so confused about
what part of the handshake we were in that we'd promptly die with an
assertion.
This is a fix for CVE-2012-2250; it's a bugfix on 0.2.3.6-alpha.
All servers running that version or later should really upgrade.
Bug and fix from "some guy from France." I tweaked his code slightly
to make it log the IP of the offending node, and to forward-port it to
0.2.4.
If we completed the handshake for the v2 link protocol but wound up
negotiating the wong protocol version, we'd become so confused about
what part of the handshake we were in that we'd promptly die with an
assertion.
This is a fix for CVE-2012-2250; it's a bugfix on 0.2.3.6-alpha.
All servers running that version or later should really upgrade.
Bug and fix from "some guy from France." I tweaked his code slightly
to make it log the IP of the offending node.
