This patch fixes a memory leak in new_establish_intro_cell() that could
happen if a test assertion fails and the *cell_out value isn't properly
free'd.
See: Coverity CID 1437445
This patch fixes a memory leak in hs_helper_build_hs_desc_impl() where
if a test assertion would fail we would leak the storage that `desc`
points to.
See: Coverity CID 1437448
This patch fixes a potential memory leak in test_hs_auth_cookies() if a
test-case fails and we goto the done label where no memory clean up is
done.
See: Coverity CID 1437453
This patch fixes a potential memory leak in
hs_helper_build_intro_point() where a `goto done` is called before the
`intro_point` variable have been assigned to the value of the `ip`
variable.
See: Coverity CID 1437460
See: Coverity CID 1437456
Out-of-tree builds could fail to run the rust tests if built in
offline mode. cargo expects CARGO_HOME to point to the .cargo
directory, not the directory containing .cargo.
Fixes bug 26455; bug not in any released tor.
Also make sure that we're actually running the test from within the right
cwd, like we do when we're building. This seems necessary to avoid
an error when running offline.
Amusingly, it appears that we had this bug before: we just weren't
noticing it, because of bug 26258.
Some versions of GCC complain that the bfn_mock_node_get_by_id
function might return NULL, but we're assuming that it won't.
(We're assuming it won't return NULL because we know in the tests
that we're passing it valid IDs.)
To make GCC happy, tt_assert() that each node_t is set before using
it.
Fixes a second case of bug26269; bugfix on 0.3.0.1-alpha.
In protover.c, the `expand_protocol_list()` function expands a `smartlist_t` of
`proto_entry_t`s to their protocol name concatenated with each version number.
For example, given a `proto_entry_t` like so:
proto_entry_t *proto = tor_malloc(sizeof(proto_entry_t));
proto_range_t *range = tor_malloc_zero(sizeof(proto_range_t));
proto->name = tor_strdup("DoSaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa[19KB]aaa");
proto->ranges = smartlist_new();
range->low = 1;
range->high = 65536;
smartlist_add(proto->ranges, range);
(Where `[19KB]` is roughly 19KB of `"a"` bytes.) This would expand in
`expand_protocol_list()` to a `smartlist_t` containing 65536 copies of the
string, e.g.:
"DoSaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa[19KB]aaa=1"
"DoSaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa[19KB]aaa=2"
[…]
"DoSaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa[19KB]aaa=65535"
Thus constituting a potential resource exhaustion attack.
The Rust implementation is not subject to this attack, because it instead
expands the above string into a `HashMap<String, HashSet<u32>` prior to #24031,
and a `HashMap<UnvalidatedProtocol, ProtoSet>` after). Neither Rust version is
subject to this attack, because it only stores the `String` once per protocol.
(Although a related, but apparently of too minor impact to be usable, DoS bug
has been fixed in #24031. [0])
[0]: https://bugs.torproject.org/24031
* ADDS hard limit on protocol name lengths in protover.c and checks in
parse_single_entry() and expand_protocol_list().
* ADDS tests to ensure the bug is caught.
* FIXES#25517: https://bugs.torproject.org/25517
LibreSSL, despite not having the OpenSSL 1.1 API, does define
OPENSSL_VERSION in crypto.h. Additionally, it apparently annotates
some functions as returning NULL, so that our unit tests need to be
more careful about checking for NULL so they don't get compilation
warnings.
Closes ticket 26006.
It tried to pick nodes for which only routerinfo_t items are set,
but without setting UseMicroDescriptors to 0. This won't work any
more, now that we're strict about using the right descriptor types
due to 25691/25692/25213.
We recently merged a circuit cell queue size safeguard. This commit adds the
number of killed circuits that have reached the limit to the DoS heartbeat. It
now looks like this:
[notice] DoS mitigation since startup: 0 circuits killed with too many
cells. 0 circuits rejected, 0 marked addresses. 0 connections closed. 0
single hop clients refused.
Second thing that this patch does. It makes tor always print the DoS
mitigation heartbeat line (for a relay) even though no DoS mitigation have
been enabled. The reason is because we now kill circuits that have too many
cells regardless on if it is enabled or not but also it will give the operator
a chance to learn what is enabled with the heartbeat instead of suddenly
appearing when it is enabled by let say the consensus.
Fixes#25824
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
When size_t is 32 bits, the unit tests can't fit anything more than
4GB-1 into a size_t.
Additionally, tt_int_op() uses "long" -- we need tt_u64_op() to
safely test uint64_t values for equality.
Bug caused by tests for #24782 fix; not in any released Tor.
This patch changes the algorithm of compute_real_max_mem_in_queues() to
use 0.4 * RAM iff the system has more than or equal to 8 GB of RAM, but
will continue to use the old value of 0.75 * RAM if the system have less
than * GB of RAM available.
This patch also adds tests for compute_real_max_mem_in_queues().
See: https://bugs.torproject.org/24782
There's now no difference in these tests w.r.t. the C or Rust: both
fail miserably (well, Rust fails with nice descriptive errors, and C
gives you a traceback, because, well, C).
The DoS potential is slightly higher in C now due to some differences to the
Rust code, see the C_RUST_DIFFERS tags in src/rust/protover/tests/protover.rs.
Also, the comment about "failing at the splitting stage" in Rust wasn't true,
since when we split, we ignore empty chunks (e.g. "1--1" parses into
"(1,None),(None,1)" and "None" can't be parsed into an integer).
Finally, the comment about "Rust seems to experience an internal error" is only
true in debug mode, where u32s are bounds-checked at runtime. In release mode,
code expressing the equivalent of this test will error with
`Err(ProtoverError::Unparseable)` because 4294967295 is too large.
Previously, if "Link=1-5" was supported, and you asked protover_all_supported()
(or protover::all_supported() in Rust) if it supported "Link=3-999", the C
version would return "Link=3-999" and the Rust would return "Link=6-999". These
both behave the same now, i.e. both return "Link=6-999".
This should avoid most intermittent test failures on developer and CI machines,
but there could (and probably should) be a more elegant solution.
Also, this test was testing that the IP was created and its expiration time was
set to a time greater than or equal to `now+INTRO_POINT_LIFETIME_MIN_SECONDS+5`:
/* Time to expire MUST also be in that range. We add 5 seconds because
* there could be a gap between setting now and the time taken in
* service_intro_point_new. On ARM, it can be surprisingly slow... */
tt_u64_op(ip->time_to_expire, OP_GE,
now + INTRO_POINT_LIFETIME_MIN_SECONDS + 5);
However, this appears to be a typo, since, according to the comment above it,
adding five seconds was done because the IP creation can be slow on some
systems. But the five seconds is added to the *minimum* time we're comparing
against, and so it actually functions to make this test *more* likely to fail on
slower systems. (It should either subtract five seconds, or instead add it to
time_to_expire.)
* FIXES#25450: https://bugs.torproject.org/25450
These were meant to demonstrate old behavior, or old rust behavior.
One of them _should_ work in Rust, but won't because of
implementation details. We'll fix that up later.
The C code and the rust code had different separate integer overflow
bugs here. That suggests that we're better off just forbidding this
pathological case.
Also, add tests for expected behavior on receiving a bad protocol
list in a consensus.
Fixes another part of 25249.
I've refactored these to be a separate function, to avoid tricky
merge conflicts.
Some of these are disabled with "XXXX" comments; they should get
fixed moving forward.
On slow system, 1 msec between one read and the other was too tight. For
instance, it failed on armel with a 4msec gap:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=tor&suite=experimental
Increase to 10 msec for now to address slow system. It is important that we
keep this OP_LE test in so we make sure the msec/usec/nsec read aren't
desynchronized by huge gaps. We'll adjust again if we ever encounter a system
that goes slower than 10 msec between calls.
Fixes#25113
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
If the cache is using 20% of our maximum allowed memory, clean 10% of it. Same
behavior as the HS descriptor cache.
Closes#25122
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
The current code flow makes it that we can release a channel in a PENDING
state but not in the pending list. This happens while the channel is being
processed in the scheduler loop.
Fixes#25125
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
This tests many cases of the KIST scheduler with the pending list state by
calling entry point in the scheduler while channels are scheduled or not.
Also, it adds a test for the bug #24700.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
