Fortunately, in 0.3.5.1-alpha we improved logging for various
failure cases involved with onion service client auth.
Unfortunately, for this one, we freed the file right before logging
its name.
Fortunately, tor_free() sets its pointer to NULL, so we didn't have
a use-after-free bug.
Unfortunately, passing NULL to %s is not defined.
Fortunately, GCC 9.1.1 caught the issue!
Unfortunately, nobody has actually tried building Tor with GCC 9.1.1
before. Or if they had, they didn't report the warning.
Fixes bug 30475; bugfix on 0.3.5.1-alpha.
The INTRODUCE1 trunnel definition file doesn't support that value so it can
not be used else it leads to an assert on the intro point side if ever tried.
Fortunately, it was impossible to reach that code path.
Part of #30454
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
See proposal 289 section 4.3 for more details.
It describes the flow control protocol at the circuit and stream level. If
there is no FlowCtrl protocol version, tor supports the unauthenticated flow
control features from its supported Relay protocols.
At this commit, relay will start advertising FlowCtrl=1 meaning they support
authenticated SENDMEs v1.
Closes#30363
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
- Move test-only cpath_get_n_hops() to crypt_path.c.
- Move onion_next_hop_in_cpath() and rename to cpath_get_next_non_open_hop().
The latter function was directly accessing cpath->state, and it's a first step
at hiding ->state.
Some of these functions are now public and cpath-specific so their name should
signify the fact they are part of the cpath module:
assert_cpath_layer_ok -> cpath_assert_layer_ok
assert_cpath_ok -> cpath_assert_ok
onion_append_hop -> cpath_append_hop
circuit_init_cpath_crypto -> cpath_init_circuit_crypto
circuit_free_cpath_node -> cpath_free
onion_append_to_cpath -> cpath_extend_linked_list
Now that we are using a constructor we should be more careful that we are
always using the constructor to initialize crypt_path_t, so make sure that
->private is initialized.
We are using an opaque pointer so the structure needs to be allocated on the
heap. This means we now need a constructor for crypt_path_t.
Also modify all places initializing a crypt_path_t to use the constructor.
For various reasons, this was a nontrivial movement. There are
several places in the code where we do something like "update the
flags on this routerstatus or node if we're an authority", and at
least one where we pretended to be an authority when we weren't.
