Disable padding via limit check and machine condition. Limits cause us to stop
sending padding. Machine conditions cause the machines to be shut down, and
not restarted.
In 0.3.4 and later, these functions are declared in rephist.h:
STATIC uint64_t find_largest_max(bw_array_t *b);
STATIC void commit_max(bw_array_t *b);
STATIC void advance_obs(bw_array_t *b);
But in 0.2.9, they are declared in rephist.c and test_relay.c.
So compilers fail with a "must use 'struct' tag" error.
We add the missing struct typedef in test_relay.c, to match the
declarations in rephist.c.
(Merge commit 813019cc57 moves these functions into rephist.h instead.)
Fixes bug 30184; not in any released version of Tor.
When releasing OpenSSL patch-level maintenance updates,
we do not want to rebuild binaries using it.
And since they guarantee ABI stability, we do not have to.
Without this patch, warning messages were produced
that confused users:
https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1129411
Fixes bug 30190; bugfix on 0.2.4.2-alpha commit 7607ad2bec
Signed-off-by: Bernhard M. Wiedemann <bwiedemann@suse.de>
In 0.3.4 and later, we declare write_array as:
extern struct bw_array_t *write_array;
...
typedef struct bw_array_t bw_array_t;
But in 0.2.9, we declare write_array as:
typedef struct bw_array_t bw_array_t;
extern bw_array_t *write_array;
And then again in rephist.c:
typedef struct bw_array_t bw_array_t;
So some compilers fail with a duplicate declaration error.
We backport 684b396ce5, which removes the duplicate declaration.
And this commit deals with the undeclared type error.
Backports a single line from merge commit 813019cc57.
Fixes bug 30184; not in any released version of Tor.
We need to encode here instead of doing escaped(), since fwict
escaped() does not currently handle NUL bytes.
Also, use warn_if_nul_found in more cases to avoid duplication.
The smartlist functions take great care to reset unused pointers inside
the smartlist memory to NULL.
The function smartlist_remove_keeporder does not clear memory in such
way when elements have been removed. Therefore call memset after the
for-loop that removes elements. If no element is removed, it is
effectively a no-op.
Signed-off-by: Tobias Stoeckmann <tobias@stoeckmann.org>