We do look at the address but with this we also look if the identity digest of
the relay suggesting us an address is a trusted source.
Related to #40022
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
This behaves like router_new_address_suggestion() but differs in couple of
ways:
1. It takes a tor_addr_t instead of an address string and supports both
AF_INET and AF_INET6.
2. It does _not_ use the last_guessed_ip local cache and instead only relies
on the last resolved address cache in resolve_addr.c
It is not used at this commit. This function is made to process a suggested
address found in a NETINFO cell exactly like router_new_address_suggestion()
does with the address a directory suggests us.
Related to #40022
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
If at least one service is configured as a version 2, a log warning is emitted
once and only once.
Closes#40003
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
In practice, there will be at most one ipv4 address and ipv6 address
for now, but this code is designed to not care which address is
which until forced to do so.
This patch does not yet actually create extend_info_t objects with
multiple addresses.
Closes#34069.
Authorities currently add themselves to the trusted dir servers list,
but if they have an IPv6 ORPort, they leave it out.
This commit makes authorities add their own IPv6 ORPort to the trusted
dir servers list.
Closes ticket 32822.
This is in response to a question about why we don't always log
orport self-tests as reachability tests.
I'm not 100% convinced that bandwidth self-tests are still useful,
but that's an issue for another day. :)
New name reflects that the function is only used to compare router addresses
in order to learn if they are in the same network.
The network check is /16 and /32 respectively for IPv4 and IPv6.
Related to #40009
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
This is not actually a bug! It can happen for a bunch of reasons,
which all boil down to "trying to add an extrainfo for which we no
longer have the corresponding routerinfo".
Fixes#16016; bugfix on 0.2.6.3-alpha.
Previously we had two chains of logic for reachability tests: one
for launching them, and one for telling the user that we had
launched them. Now, we simply have the launch code inform the user:
this way, we can't get out of sync.
Closes ticket 34137.
AssumeReachable should only be about whether a relay thinks that it
is reachable itself. But previously, we've had it also turn off
reachability checking of _other_ relays on authorities.
(Technically, reachability tests were still run, but we would ignore
the results.)
With this patch, there is a new AuthDirTestReachability option
(default 1) that controls whether authorities run reachability
tests.
Making this change allows us to have test networks where authorities
set AssumeReachable without disabling their reachability testing
entirely.
Closes ticket #34445.
These parameters do not suppress checks, but they tell relays that
it's okay to publish even when those checks fail.
I have chosen lowercase hyphenated names, since these seem to be
more common in networkstatus params.
Closes#33224 and part of #34064.
This was supposed to happen in #40012, but the command line was wrong.
This is an automated commit, generated by this command:
./scripts/maint/rename_c_identifier.py \
router_should_skip_orport_reachability_check router_all_orports_seem_reachable
Replace it by find_my_address() everywhere. This changes many parts of the
code that uses it to use a tor_addr_t instead of a plain uint32_t for IPv4.
Many changes to the unit test to also use the new interface.
Part #33233
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Series of changes:
1. Rename function to reflect the namespace of the file.
2. Use the new last resolved cache instead of the unused
last_resolved_addr_v4 (which is also removed in this commit).
3. Make the entire code base use the new resolved_addr_is_local() function.
You will notice that this function uses /24 to differentiate subnets where the
rest of tor uses /16 (including documentation of EnforceDistinctSubnets).
Ticket #40009 has been opened for that.
But that the moment, the function keeps looking at /24.
Part of #33233
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Series of things done in this commit:
1. Rename the functions to better reflect the namespace of the file.
2. Make both reset and get function to operate on the last_resolved_addrs
cache that is per family.
3. Make the get function to take a tor_addr_t.
4. Change all callsite to use the new convention.
Part of #33233
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
These identifiers are confusing and unreadable. I think these
replacements should be better. Closes ticket #40012.
This is an automated commit, generated by this command:
./scripts/maint/rename_c_identifier.py \
router_should_skip_orport_reachability_check_family router_orport_seems_reachable \
router_should_skip_dirport_reachability_check router_dirport_seems_reachable \
router_should_skip_dirport_reachability_check router_all_orports_seem_reachable
Since "skip orport check" is the "and" of v4_ok and v6_ok, we can
just compute v4_ok and v6_ok once, to clarify that we don't enter
this block of code if they're both true.
With prop312, we want to support IPv4 and IPv6 thus multiple Address statement
(up to 2) will be accepted.
For this, "Address" option becomes a LINELIST so we can properly process the
IPv4 or/and IPv6.
Part of #33233
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
I've managed to keep this change mainly contained to our
self-testing module. The changes here are:
* There are two different variables for tracking "is our orport
reachable".
* We have a new function that says whether we can skip a single
family's orport reachability test; the old function for this now
tells whether we can skip _all_ orport reachability testing.
(The name, router_should_skip_orport_reachability_test, is not
so good. I will rename it later if I can think of a good
replacement.)
* The function that launches orport reachability tests now only
launches the ones that haven't completed.
* The function that notes that we're reachable on an ORPort now
takes a family.
* Various log messages are cleaned up.
Since Tor 0.2.9 has been unsupported since January, 0.3.5 is the
oldest supported version, and its features constitute the oldest
recommended feature-set.
This patch updates these recommendations:
DirCache=2
Support for consensus diffs.
New in 0.3.1.1-alpha.
HSDir=2
Support for v3 onion service descriptors.
New in 0.3.0.4-alpha.
HSIntro=4
Support for Ed25519 intropoint authentication keys.
New in 0.3.0-4-alpha.
HSRend=2
Support for rendezvous cells longer than 20 bytes.
New in 0.2.9.4-alpha.
Link=5
Link padding and link padding negotiation.
New in 0.3.3.2-alpha.
LinkAuth=3
Ed25519 link authentication.
New in 0.3.0.1-alpha.
Resume being willing to use preemptively-built circuits when
UseEntryGuards is set to 0. We accidentally disabled this feature with
that config setting (in our fix for #24469), leading to slower load times.
Fixes bug 34303; bugfix on 0.3.3.2-alpha.
Add an inline helper function that indicates if the cached object contains a
decrypted descriptor or not.
The descriptor object is NULL if tor is unable to decrypt it (lacking client
authorization) and some actions need to be done only when we have a decrypted
object.
This improves code semantic.
Fixes#33458
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
The warning was:
11:23:10 ../tor/src/feature/hs/hs_service.c: In function 'log_cant_upload_desc':
11:23:10 ../tor/src/feature/hs/hs_service.c:3118:3: error: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false [-Werror=type-limits]
See #34254 for more info.
I guess this means that gcc assigned an unsigned type to the
`log_desc_upload_reason_t` enum and it warned if we compared it against 0...
For now I think it's simpler to remove that check instead of turning the enum
to a signed type, or trying to hack it some other way.
From what it seems, enum is up to the compiler on whether it's signed/unsigned:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/159034/are-c-enums-signed-or-unsigned
Instead, call out to a helper function, repeating the call if needed.
Avoids duplicating exclusions for:
* the current relay's family, and
* any exclusions specified by the caller.
Part of 34200.
And delete a loop that is now empty. This change should improve tor's
performance, because we no longer iterate through the nodelist twice for
every node in every circuit path.
Part of 34200.
Rewrite inform_testing_reachability() to use separate buffers for IPv4
ORPort, IPv6 ORPort, and IPv4 DirPort. And use consistent APIs to fill
those buffers.
Part of 33222.
This is an automated commit, generated by this command:
./scripts/maint/rename_c_identifier.py \
client_or_conn_should_skip_reachable_address_check router_or_conn_should_skip_reachable_address_check \
client_dir_conn_should_skip_reachable_address_check router_dir_conn_should_skip_reachable_address_check
This is an automated commit, generated by this command:
./scripts/maint/rename_c_identifier.py \
router_skip_orport_reachability_check router_should_skip_orport_reachability_check \
router_skip_dirport_reachability_check router_should_skip_dirport_reachability_check \
router_connect_assume_or_reachable client_or_conn_should_skip_reachable_address_check \
router_connect_assume_dir_reachable client_dir_conn_should_skip_reachable_address_check
It was generated with --no-verify, so it probably breaks some commit hooks.
The commiter should be sure to fix them up in a subsequent commit.
GCC added an implicit-fallthrough warning a while back, where it
would complain if you had a nontrivial "case:" block that didn't end
with break, return, or something like that. Clang recently added
the same thing.
GCC, however, would let you annotate a fall-through as intended by
any of various magic "/* fall through */" comments. Clang, however,
only seems to like "__attribute__((fallthrough))". Fortunately, GCC
accepts that too.
A previous commit in this branch defined a FALLTHROUGH macro to do
the right thing if GNUC is defined; here we replace all of our "fall
through" comments with uses of that macro.
This is an automated commit, made with the following perl one-liner:
#!/usr/bin/perl -i -p
s#/\* *falls? ?thr.*?\*/#FALLTHROUGH;#i;
(In order to avoid conflicts, I'm applying this script separately to
each maint branch. This is the 0.4.3 version.)
GCC added an implicit-fallthrough warning a while back, where it
would complain if you had a nontrivial "case:" block that didn't end
with break, return, or something like that. Clang recently added
the same thing.
GCC, however, would let you annotate a fall-through as intended by
any of various magic "/* fall through */" comments. Clang, however,
only seems to like "__attribute__((fallthrough))". Fortunately, GCC
accepts that too.
A previous commit in this branch defined a FALLTHROUGH macro to do
the right thing if GNUC is defined; here we replace all of our "fall
through" comments with uses of that macro.
This is an automated commit, made with the following perl one-liner:
#!/usr/bin/perl -i -p
s#/\* *falls? ?thr.*?\*/#FALLTHROUGH;#i;
(In order to avoid conflicts, I'm applying this script separately to
each maint branch. This is the 0.4.2 version.)
GCC added an implicit-fallthrough warning a while back, where it
would complain if you had a nontrivial "case:" block that didn't end
with break, return, or something like that. Clang recently added
the same thing.
GCC, however, would let you annotate a fall-through as intended by
any of various magic "/* fall through */" comments. Clang, however,
only seems to like "__attribute__((fallthrough))". Fortunately, GCC
accepts that too.
A previous commit in this branch defined a FALLTHROUGH macro to do
the right thing if GNUC is defined; here we replace all of our "fall
through" comments with uses of that macro.
This is an automated commit, made with the following perl one-liner:
#!/usr/bin/perl -i -p
s#/\* *falls? ?thr.*?\*/#FALLTHROUGH;#i;
(In order to avoid conflicts, I'm applying this script separately to
each maint branch. This is the 0.4.1 version.)
GCC added an implicit-fallthrough warning a while back, where it
would complain if you had a nontrivial "case:" block that didn't end
with break, return, or something like that. Clang recently added
the same thing.
GCC, however, would let you annotate a fall-through as intended by
any of various magic "/* fall through */" comments. Clang, however,
only seems to like "__attribute__((fallthrough))". Fortunately, GCC
accepts that too.
A previous commit in this branch defined a FALLTHROUGH macro to do
the right thing if GNUC is defined; here we replace all of our "fall
through" comments with uses of that macro.
This is an automated commit, made with the following perl one-liner:
#!/usr/bin/perl -i -p
s#/\* *falls? ?thr.*?\*/#FALLTHROUGH;#i;
Move a series of function from config.c into that new file which is related to
address resolving.
Part of #33789
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
This commit moves router_pick_published_address() and the related helper
functions into the new file.
The log_addr_has_changed() function has been made public in router.h so we can
use it in relay_resolve_addr.c.
This is a refactoring as part of Sponsor 55. Only code movement at this
commit.
Part of #33789
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Do not try to stuff "HS_DESC_DECODE_GENERIC_ERROR" (-1) into a
socks5_reply_status_t (enum). It doesn't actually make sense, and
isn't one of our documented extensions.
(This can only happen on a nonfatal assertion that we haven't seen,
so it probably isn't happening in practice.)
Fixes another case of bug 34077; bugfix on 0.4.3.1-alpha.
