We're calling mallocfn() and reallocfn() in the HT_GENERATE macro
with the result of a product. But that makes any sane analyzer
worry about overflow.
This patch keeps HT_GENERATE having its old semantics, since we
aren't the only project using ht.h. Instead, define a HT_GENERATE2
that takes a reallocarrayfn.
Most of these are in somewhat non-obvious code where it is probably
a good idea to initialize variables and add extra assertions anyway.
Closes 13036. Patches from "teor".
It's now a protocol-warn, since there's nothing relay operators can
do about a client that sends them a malformed create cell.
Resolves bug 12996; bugfix on 0.0.6rc1.
The fix for bug 4647 accidentally removed our hack from bug 586 that
rewrote HashedControlPassword to __HashedControlSessionPassword when
it appears on the commandline (which allowed the user to set her own
HashedControlPassword in the torrc file while the controller generates
a fresh session password for each run).
Fixes bug 12948; bugfix on 0.2.5.1-alpha.
This way, we don't get locking failures when we hit an assertion in
the unit tests. Also, we might find out about unit test bugs from
folks who can't do gdb.
Using the *_array() functions here confused coverity, and was actually
a bit longer than we needed. Now we just use macros for the repeated
bits, so that we can mention a file and a suffix-appended version in
one line.
We had some code to fix up the 'status' return value to -1 on error
if it wasn't set, but it was unreachable because our code was
correct. Tweak this by initializing status to -1, and then only
setting it to 0 on success. Also add a goto which was missing: its
absence was harmless.
[CID 718614, 718616]
(We allowed it previously, but produced an LD_BUG message when it
happened, which is not consistent
Also, remove inconsistent NULL checks before calling
rend_service_intro_free.
(Removing the check is for CID 718613)
Coverity doesn't like doing NULL checks on things that can't be
NULL; I like checking things where the logic for their not being
NULL is nontrivial. Let's compromise, and make it obvious that this
field can't be NULL.
[Coverity CID 202004]
Coverity thinks that when we do "double x = int1/int2;", we probably
meant "double x = ((double)int1) / int2;". In these cases, we
didn't.
[Coverity CID 1232089 and 1232090]
