Nick Mathewson
0bce0161dd
Revise proposal 162: SHA256(x), not SHA256(SHA256(x))
...
The point of doing SHA256 twice is, generally, is to prevent message
extension attacks where an attacker who knows H(A) can calculate
H(A|B). But for attaching a signature to a document, the attacker
already _knows_ A, so trying to keep them from calculating H(A|B) is
pointless.
2009-10-15 15:17:13 -04:00
Nick Mathewson
80a7a34755
Revise 162's idea of how detached signatures work with flavors
...
The original proposal was vague and would have made older Tors reject
detached-signature documents as soon as they saw one with flavors.
2009-10-15 15:17:12 -04:00
Nick Mathewson
bdd5785f07
Small changes to proposals 158 and 162 based on comments from arma
2009-06-15 14:18:32 -04:00
Roger Dingledine
08fd7e61c7
proposals tweaks patch
...
is attached
--roger
>From 674f087ab98e1711bb533acf23ee88c7c2a1dfdb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Roger Dingledine <arma@torproject.org>
Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 14:37:32 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] minor edits on proposals
2009-06-07 23:51:14 -04:00
Sebastian Hahn
169c019a60
spelling fixes for proposals
2009-06-06 23:42:07 +02:00
Nick Mathewson
143e6677ff
Add acks section to prop 162.
2009-05-15 16:32:18 -04:00
Nick Mathewson
dc1253af7b
Add new proposal 162: "Publish the consensus in multiple flavors"
2009-05-15 13:03:42 -04:00
