Both client and service had their own code for this. Consolidate into one
place so we avoid duplication.
Closes#27549
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Occasionally, key pinning doesn't catch a relay that shares an ed25519
ID with another relay. Log the identity fingerprints and the shared
ed25519 ID when this happens, instead of making a BUG() warning.
Fixes bug 27800; bugfix on 0.3.2.1-alpha.
Commit 488e2b00bf introduced an issue, most
likely introduced by a bad copy paste, that made us stop reading on the
connection if our write bandwidth limit was reached.
The problem is that because "read_blocked_on_bw" was never set, the connection
was never reenabled for reading.
This is most likely the cause of #27813 where bytes were accumulating in the
kernel TCP bufers because tor was not doing reads. Only relays with
RelayBandwidthRate would suffer from this but affecting all relays connecting
to them. And using that tor option is recommended and best practice so many
many relays have it enabled.
Fixes#28089.
It turns out that if _only_ the ControlPort is set and nothing else, tor would
simply not bootstrap and thus not start properly. Commit 67a41b6306
removed that requirement for tor to be considered a "client".
Unfortunately, this made the mainloop enable basically nothing if only the
ControlPort is set in the torrc.
This commit now makes it that we also consider the ControlPort when deciding
if we are a Client or not. It does not revert 67a41b6306 meaning
options_any_client_port_set() stays the same, not looking at the control port.
Fixes#27849.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Nothing should ever look at them on failure, but in some cases,
the unit tests don't check for failure, and then GCC-LTO freaks out.
Fixes part of 27772.
These confused GCC LTO, which thought they might be used
uninitialized. I'm pretty sure that as long as 'res' indicates
success, they will always be set to something, but let's unconfuse
the compiler in any case.
