Using the *_array() functions here confused coverity, and was actually
a bit longer than we needed. Now we just use macros for the repeated
bits, so that we can mention a file and a suffix-appended version in
one line.
We had some code to fix up the 'status' return value to -1 on error
if it wasn't set, but it was unreachable because our code was
correct. Tweak this by initializing status to -1, and then only
setting it to 0 on success. Also add a goto which was missing: its
absence was harmless.
[CID 718614, 718616]
(We allowed it previously, but produced an LD_BUG message when it
happened, which is not consistent
Also, remove inconsistent NULL checks before calling
rend_service_intro_free.
(Removing the check is for CID 718613)
Coverity doesn't like doing NULL checks on things that can't be
NULL; I like checking things where the logic for their not being
NULL is nontrivial. Let's compromise, and make it obvious that this
field can't be NULL.
[Coverity CID 202004]
Coverity thinks that when we do "double x = int1/int2;", we probably
meant "double x = ((double)int1) / int2;". In these cases, we
didn't.
[Coverity CID 1232089 and 1232090]
Previously, we had documented it to return -1 or 0, when in fact
lseek returns -1 or the new position in the file.
This is harmless, since we were only checking for negative values
when we used tor_fd_seekend.
Two bugs here:
1) We didn't add EXTEND2/EXTENDED2 to relay_command_to_string().
2) relay_command_to_string() didn't log the value of unrecognized
commands.
Both fixed here.
This will fix the warning
"/src/or/config.c:6854:48: error: unused parameter 'group_readable'"
that I introduced while fixing 12864.
Bug not in any released version of Tor.
Implements proposal 215; closes ticket 10163.
Why? From proposal 215:
Consensus method 1 is no longer viable for the Tor network. It
doesn't result in a microdescriptor consensus, and omits other
fields that clients need in order to work well. Consensus methods
under 12 have security issues, since they let a single authority
set a consensus parameter.
...
For example, while Tor 0.2.4.x is under development, authorities
should really not be running anything before Tor 0.2.3.x. Tor
0.2.3.x has supported consensus method 13 since 0.2.3.21-rc, so
it's okay for 0.2.4.x to require 13 as the minimum method. We even
might go back to method 12, since the worst outcome of not using 13
would be some warnings in client logs. Consensus method 12 was a
security improvement, so we don't want to roll back before that.
