Turns out that we were only recording the "b_digest" but to have
bidirectionnal authenticated SENDMEs, we need to use the "f_digest" in the
forward cell situation.
Because of the cpath refactoring, this commit plays with the crypt_path_ and
relay_crypto_t API a little bit in order to respect the abstractions.
Previously, we would record the cell digest as the SENDME digest in the
decrypt cell function but to avoid code duplication (both directions needs to
record), we now do that right after iff the cell is recognized (at the edge).
It is now done in circuit_receive_relay_cell() instead.
We now also record the cell digest as the SENDME digest in both relay cell
encryption functions since they are split depending on the direction.
relay_encrypt_cell_outbound() and relay_encrypt_cell_inbound() need to
consider recording the cell digest depending on their direction (f vs b
digest).
Fixes#30428
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
It turns out that only the exit side is validating the authenticated SENDME v1
logic and never the client side. Which means that if a client ever uploaded
data towards an exit, the authenticated SENDME logic wouldn't apply.
For this to work, we have to record the cell digest client side as well which
introduced a new function that supports both type of edges.
This also removes a test that is not valid anymore which was that we didn't
allow cell recording on an origin circuit (client).
Part of #30428
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Because github PRs choose the most recent origin/master at the time of the PR
(and for any fixups pushed to a PR later to send to CI), there are tons of
conflicts and unexpected practracker issues.
This means CI can suddenly fail after fixups to a branch that pass locally.
Then CI fails and we have to close and re-open the PR.
Split the core reply formatting code out of control_fmt.c into
control_proto.c. The remaining code in control_format.c deals with
specific subsystems and will eventually move to join those subsystems.
(This should be all of the command that work nicely with positional
arguments only.)
Some of these commands should probably treat extra arguments as
incorrect, but for now I'm trying to be careful not to break
any existing users.
The first line break in particular was mishandled: it was discarded
if no arguments came before it, which made it impossible to
distinguish arguments from the first line of the body.
To solve this, we need to allocate a copy of the command rather than
using NUL to separate it, since we might have "COMMAND\n" as our input.
Fixes ticket 29984.
