nihilist/tor
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/tor.git synced 2024-11-27 22:03:31 +01:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

r17929@catbus: nickm | 2008-02-05 17:10:26 -0500

Browse Source 
Fix or downgrade a few XXX020 items.


svn:r13393
This commit is contained in:
Nick Mathewson 2008-02-05 23:20:44 +00:00
parent 9c7eaa7a9d
commit ff9bd0fd3a
4 changed files with 22 additions and 21 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

7
doc/spec/dir-spec.txt
View File

@ -945,8 +945,9 @@ $Id$
protocol versioning system, and the protocol is "a version of the
Tor protocol more recent than any we recognize."
Directory authorities SHOULD truncate version strings from
descriptors so that "v" lines are no more than 128 characters long.
Directory authorities SHOULD omit version strings they receive from
descriptors if they would cause "v" lines to be over 128 characters
long.
The signature section contains the following item, which appears
Exactly Once for a vote, and At Least Once for a consensus.
@ -1253,6 +1254,8 @@ $Id$
http://<hostname>/tor/status-vote/current/consensus.z
and
http://<hostname>/tor/status-vote/current/consensus-signatures.z
[XXX current/consensus-signatures is not currently implemented, as it
is not used in the voting protocol.]
The other vote documents are analogously made available under
http://<hostname>/tor/status-vote/current/authority.z

5
src/or/directory.c
View File

@ -2346,8 +2346,9 @@ directory_handle_command_get(dir_connection_t *conn, const char *headers,
if ((item = dirvote_get_pending_consensus()))
smartlist_add(items, (char*)item);
} else if (!current && !strcmp(url, "consensus-signatures")) {
/* XXXX020 the spec says that we should implement
* current/consensus-signatures too. Why? -NM */
/* XXXX the spec says that we should implement
* current/consensus-signatures too. It doesn't seem to be needed,
* though. */
const char *item;
if ((item=dirvote_get_pending_detached_signatures()))
smartlist_add(items, (char*)item);

2
src/or/networkstatus.c
View File

@ -783,7 +783,7 @@ networkstatus_vote_find_entry(networkstatus_t *ns, const char *digest)
_compare_digest_to_routerstatus_entry);
}
/*XXXX020 make this static once functions are moved into this file. */
/*XXXX make this static once functions are moved into this file. */
/** DOCDOC */
int
networkstatus_vote_find_entry_idx(networkstatus_t *ns,

27
src/or/routerlist.c
View File

@ -633,12 +633,9 @@ router_rebuild_store(int force, desc_store_t *store)
log_warn(LD_FS, "We wrote some bytes to a new descriptor file at '%s',"
" but when we went to mmap it, it was empty!", fname);
} else if (had_any) {
log_notice(LD_FS, "We just removed every descriptor in '%s'. This is "
log_info(LD_FS, "We just removed every descriptor in '%s'. This is "
"okay if we're just starting up after a long time. "
"Otherwise, it's a bug.",
fname);
/* XXX020 should we reduce the severity of the above log
* message? I don't think we see it much in practice. -RD */
"Otherwise, it's a bug.", fname);
}
} else {
log_warn(LD_FS, "Unable to mmap new descriptor file at '%s'.",fname);
@ -1809,8 +1806,8 @@ router_get_by_nickname(const char *nickname, int warn_if_unnamed)
) {
if (router_hex_digest_matches(router, nickname))
return router;
else
best_match = router; // XXXX020 NM not exactly right.
/* If we reach this point, we have a ID=name syntax that matches the
* identity but not the name. That isn't an acceptable match. */
}
});
@ -2135,7 +2132,7 @@ routerinfo_free(routerinfo_t *router)
}
addr_policy_list_free(router->exit_policy);
/* XXXX020 Remove once 414/417 is fixed. But I have a hunch... */
/* XXXX Remove if this turns out to affect performance. */
memset(router, 77, sizeof(routerinfo_t));
tor_free(router);
@ -2150,7 +2147,7 @@ extrainfo_free(extrainfo_t *extrainfo)
tor_free(extrainfo->cache_info.signed_descriptor_body);
tor_free(extrainfo->pending_sig);
/* XXXX020 remove this once more bugs go away. */
/* XXXX remove this if it turns out to slow us down. */
memset(extrainfo, 88, sizeof(extrainfo_t)); /* debug bad memory usage */
tor_free(extrainfo);
}
@ -2161,7 +2158,7 @@ signed_descriptor_free(signed_descriptor_t *sd)
{
tor_free(sd->signed_descriptor_body);
/* XXXX020 remove this once more bugs go away. */
/* XXXX remove this once more bugs go away. */
memset(sd, 99, sizeof(signed_descriptor_t)); /* Debug bad mem usage */
tor_free(sd);
}
@ -2258,7 +2255,7 @@ routerlist_insert(routerlist_t *rl, routerinfo_t *ri)
{
routerinfo_t *ri_old;
{
/* XXXX020 remove this code once bug 417/404 is fixed. */
/* XXXX Remove if this slows us down. */
routerinfo_t *ri_generated = router_get_my_routerinfo();
tor_assert(ri_generated != ri);
}
@ -2293,7 +2290,7 @@ extrainfo_insert(routerlist_t *rl, extrainfo_t *ei)
extrainfo_t *ei_tmp;
{
/* XXXX020 remove this code once bug 417/404 is fixed. */
/* XXXX remove this code if it slows us down. */
extrainfo_t *ei_generated = router_get_my_extrainfo();
tor_assert(ei_generated != ei);
}
@ -2339,7 +2336,7 @@ static void
routerlist_insert_old(routerlist_t *rl, routerinfo_t *ri)
{
{
/* XXXX020 remove this code once bug 417/404 is fixed. */
/* XXXX remove this code if it slows us down. */
routerinfo_t *ri_generated = router_get_my_routerinfo();
tor_assert(ri_generated != ri);
}
@ -2436,7 +2433,7 @@ routerlist_remove_old(routerlist_t *rl, signed_descriptor_t *sd, int idx)
}
tor_assert(0 <= idx && idx < smartlist_len(rl->old_routers));
/* XXX020 edmanm's bridge relay triggered the following assert while
* running 0.2.0.12-alpha: */
* running 0.2.0.12-alpha. */
tor_assert(smartlist_get(rl->old_routers, idx) == sd);
tor_assert(idx == sd->routerlist_index);
@ -2486,7 +2483,7 @@ routerlist_replace(routerlist_t *rl, routerinfo_t *ri_old,
routerinfo_t *ri_tmp;
extrainfo_t *ei_tmp;
{
/* XXXX020 remove this code once bug 417/404 is fixed. */
/* XXXX Remove this if it turns out to slow us down. */
routerinfo_t *ri_generated = router_get_my_routerinfo();
tor_assert(ri_generated != ri_new);
}