mirror of
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/tor.git
synced 2024-11-10 21:23:58 +01:00
r15612@catbus: nickm | 2007-10-09 19:11:55 -0400
Clarify proposal 122 and add another note. svn:r11824
This commit is contained in:
parent
72f352880c
commit
f3139b3dbc
@ -43,8 +43,10 @@ Status: Open
|
||||
2. The stopgap solution:
|
||||
|
||||
tor26 should start accepting and listing the imposters, but it should
|
||||
assign them a new flag: "Unnamed". This would produce three cases in
|
||||
terms of assigning flags:
|
||||
assign them a new flag: "Unnamed".
|
||||
|
||||
This would produce three cases in terms of assigning flags in the consensus
|
||||
networkstatus:
|
||||
|
||||
i) a router gets the Named flag in the v3 networkstatus if
|
||||
a) it's the only router with that nickname that has the Named flag
|
||||
@ -98,6 +100,11 @@ Status: Open
|
||||
entire period. We could solve this by making the voting more complex,
|
||||
but that doesn't seem worth it.
|
||||
|
||||
[3.3. Tor26 is only one tor26.
|
||||
|
||||
We need more naming authorities, possibly with some kind of auto-naming
|
||||
feature. This is out-of-scope for this proposal -NM]
|
||||
|
||||
4. Other benefits:
|
||||
|
||||
This new flag will allow people to operate servers that happen to have
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user