put some dates on the proposals, and add an acknowledgments section

to proposal 110. the proposals that were around before the proposals
scheme got started still don't have dates.


svn:r9815
This commit is contained in:
Roger Dingledine 2007-03-14 04:48:13 +00:00
parent ded02139f0
commit f0b131f1c0
5 changed files with 11 additions and 11 deletions

View File

@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Title: Proposals that should be written
Version: $Revision$
Last-Modified: $Date$
Author: Nick Mathewson, Roger Dingledine
Created:
Created: 26-Jan-2007
Status: Meta
Overview:

View File

@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Title: Miscellaneous proposals
Version: $Revision$
Last-Modified: $Date$
Author: Various
Created:
Created: 26-Jan-2007
Status: Meta
Overview:

View File

@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Title: Checking fewer things during TLS handshakes
Version: $Revision: 12105 $
Last-Modified: $Date: 2007-01-30T07:50:01.643717Z $
Author: Nick Mathewson
Created:
Created: 9-Feb-2007
Status: Closed
Overview:

View File

@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Title: Base "Stable" Flag on Mean Time Between Failures
Version: $Revision: 12105 $
Last-Modified: $Date: 2007-01-30T07:50:01.643717Z $
Author: Nick Mathewson
Created:
Created: 10-Mar-2007
Status: Open
Overview:

View File

@ -1,15 +1,9 @@
Hi folks,
I figured I'd get up to speed on proposal writing with a rather simple
one, rather than jump in over my head first. :) This design has been
kicking around since Christian Grothoff and I came up with it at PET 2004.
Filename: 1xx-avoid-infinite-circuits.txt
Title: Avoiding infinite length circuits
Version:
Last-Modified:
Author: Roger Dingledine
Created:
Created: 13-Mar-2007
Status: Open
Overview:
@ -103,3 +97,9 @@ Additional complexity:
in the lifetime of the circuit. This would let us extend the circuit
later on in its life if we decided it was worth doing, though we would
reveal our intent to each node in the circuit when we do.
Acknowledgements:
This design has been kicking around since Christian Grothoff and I
came up with it at PET 2004.