mirror of
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/tor.git
synced 2024-11-10 21:23:58 +01:00
Add missing documentation for counter-mode checks
This commit is contained in:
parent
cc5c14b732
commit
dca3c9fff8
@ -47,8 +47,8 @@
|
||||
* OpenSSL pre-1.0 (by about 10%!). But OpenSSL 1.0.0 added a counter mode
|
||||
* implementation faster than the one here (by about 7%). So we pick which
|
||||
* one to used based on the Openssl version above. (OpenSSL 1.0.0a fixed a
|
||||
* critical bug in that counter mode implementation, so we actually require
|
||||
* that one.)
|
||||
* critical bug in that counter mode implementation, so we need to test to
|
||||
* make sure that we have a fixed version.)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
/*======================================================================*/
|
||||
@ -90,12 +90,13 @@ struct aes_cnt_cipher {
|
||||
uint8_t using_evp;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
/** True if we should prefer the EVP implementation for AES, either because
|
||||
/** True iff we should prefer the EVP implementation for AES, either because
|
||||
* we're testing it or because we have hardware acceleration configured */
|
||||
static int should_use_EVP = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CAN_USE_OPENSSL_CTR
|
||||
/**DOCDOC*/
|
||||
/** True iff we have tested the counter-mode implementation and found that it
|
||||
* doesn't have the counter-mode bug from OpenSSL 1.0.0. */
|
||||
static int should_use_openssl_CTR = 0;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
@ -129,7 +130,13 @@ evaluate_evp_for_aes(int force_val)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**DOCDOC*/
|
||||
/** Test the OpenSSL counter mode implementation to see whether it has the
|
||||
* counter-mode bug from OpenSSL 1.0.0. If the implementation works, then
|
||||
* we will use it for future encryption/decryption operations.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* We can't just look at the OpenSSL version, since some distributions update
|
||||
* their OpenSSL packages without changing the version number.
|
||||
**/
|
||||
int
|
||||
evaluate_ctr_for_aes(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user