Merge branch 'maint-0.3.5' into maint-0.4.2

This commit is contained in:
Alexander Færøy 2020-06-30 14:23:41 +00:00
commit dbb70d85bf
3 changed files with 13 additions and 2 deletions

5
changes/bug34303 Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
o Minor bugfixes (client performance):
- Resume being willing to use preemptively-built circuits when
UseEntryGuards is set to 0. We accidentally disabled this feature
with that config setting, leading to slower load times. Fixes bug
34303; bugfix on 0.3.3.2-alpha.

View File

@ -1938,7 +1938,7 @@ circuit_find_to_cannibalize(uint8_t purpose_to_produce, extend_info_t *info,
} }
/* Ignore any circuits for which we can't use the Guard. It is possible /* Ignore any circuits for which we can't use the Guard. It is possible
* that the Guard was removed from the samepled set after the circuit * that the Guard was removed from the sampled set after the circuit
* was created so avoid using it. */ * was created so avoid using it. */
if (!entry_guard_could_succeed(circ->guard_state)) { if (!entry_guard_could_succeed(circ->guard_state)) {
goto next; goto next;

View File

@ -3452,10 +3452,16 @@ entry_guards_update_state(or_state_t *state)
entry_guards_dirty = 0; entry_guards_dirty = 0;
} }
/** Return true iff the circuit's guard can succeed that is can be used. */ /** Return true iff the circuit's guard can succeed, that is, can be used. */
int int
entry_guard_could_succeed(const circuit_guard_state_t *guard_state) entry_guard_could_succeed(const circuit_guard_state_t *guard_state)
{ {
if (get_options()->UseEntryGuards == 0) {
/* we're fine with this circuit's first hop, because we're not
* configured to use entry guards. */
return 1;
}
if (!guard_state) { if (!guard_state) {
return 0; return 0;
} }