Be a little more careful when our calculated bandwidth is so high that we could never ever exhaust our bandwidth limit. This should resolve bug 130.

svn:r6146
This commit is contained in:
Nick Mathewson 2006-03-13 01:06:55 +00:00
parent daea6b21a5
commit dad60905a8

View File

@ -443,7 +443,7 @@ accounting_set_wakeup_time(void)
char digest[DIGEST_LEN];
crypto_digest_env_t *d_env;
int time_in_interval;
int time_to_exhaust_bw;
uint64_t time_to_exhaust_bw;
int time_to_consider;
if (! identity_key_is_set()) {
@ -478,10 +478,16 @@ accounting_set_wakeup_time(void)
return;
}
time_to_exhaust_bw = (int)
(get_options()->AccountingMax/expected_bandwidth_usage)*60;
time_in_interval = interval_end_time - interval_start_time;
time_to_consider = time_in_interval - time_to_exhaust_bw;
time_to_exhaust_bw =
(get_options()->AccountingMax/expected_bandwidth_usage)*60;
if (time_to_exhaust_bw > TIME_MAX) {
time_to_exhaust_bw = TIME_MAX;
time_to_consider = 0;
} else {
time_to_consider = time_in_interval - (int)time_to_exhaust_bw;
}
if (time_to_consider<=0) {
interval_wakeup_time = interval_start_time;
@ -504,13 +510,16 @@ accounting_set_wakeup_time(void)
char buf2[ISO_TIME_LEN+1];
char buf3[ISO_TIME_LEN+1];
char buf4[ISO_TIME_LEN+1];
time_t down_time = interval_wakeup_time+time_to_exhaust_bw;
time_t down_time;
if (interval_wakeup_time+time_to_exhaust_bw > TIME_MAX)
down_time = TIME_MAX;
else
down_time = (time_t)(interval_wakeup_time+time_to_exhaust_bw);
if (down_time>interval_end_time)
down_time = interval_end_time;
format_local_iso_time(buf1, interval_start_time);
format_local_iso_time(buf2, interval_wakeup_time);
format_local_iso_time(buf3,
down_time<interval_end_time?down_time:interval_end_time);
format_local_iso_time(buf3, down_time);
format_local_iso_time(buf4, interval_end_time);
log_notice(LD_ACCT,