fix these typos too while i'm at it

svn:r10431
This commit is contained in:
Roger Dingledine 2007-05-31 23:58:54 +00:00
parent cf8153beff
commit d8a1f31283

View File

@ -290,7 +290,7 @@
One could argue, though, that once those servers are over-congested,
their bandwidth per circuit drops, which would in turn lower their
reputation in the future. A question is whether this would overall
stablize.
stabilize.
Another possible way is to keep a cap on reputation. In this way, a
fraction of servers would have the same high reputation, thus balancing
@ -347,7 +347,7 @@
gets preferred treatment at each node. A node "spends" its value, which
it earned a priori by providing service, to the next node by sending
and receiving bytes. Once a node has overspent its values, the circuit
cannot stay as premium. It can either breaks or converts into a normal
cannot stay as premium. It either breaks or converts into a normal
circuit. Each node also reserves a small portion of bandwidth for
normal circuits to prevent starvation.