when we had multiple conns on a circuit, we'd tell the wrong

one to stop reading


svn:r163
This commit is contained in:
Roger Dingledine 2003-02-28 23:49:52 +00:00
parent 7461959371
commit c5e7d4ca7a

View File

@ -615,7 +615,7 @@ repeat_connection_package_raw_inbuf:
return -1;
}
log(LOG_DEBUG,"connection_package_raw_inbuf(): Packaging %d bytes (%d waiting).",cell.length, amount_to_process);
log(LOG_DEBUG,"connection_package_raw_inbuf(): (%d) Packaging %d bytes (%d waiting).",conn->s,cell.length, amount_to_process);
*(uint16_t *)(cell.payload+2) = htons(conn->topic_id);
*cell.payload = TOPIC_COMMAND_DATA;
@ -631,7 +631,7 @@ repeat_connection_package_raw_inbuf:
}
assert(conn->n_receive_topicwindow > 0);
if(--conn->n_receive_topicwindow <= 0) { /* is it 0 after decrement? */
connection_stop_reading(circ->n_conn);
connection_stop_reading(conn);
log(LOG_DEBUG,"connection_package_raw_inbuf(): receive_topicwindow at exit reached 0.");
return 0; /* don't process the inbuf any more */
}
@ -646,7 +646,7 @@ repeat_connection_package_raw_inbuf:
}
assert(conn->p_receive_topicwindow > 0);
if(--conn->p_receive_topicwindow <= 0) { /* is it 0 after decrement? */
connection_stop_reading(circ->p_conn);
connection_stop_reading(conn);
log(LOG_DEBUG,"connection_package_raw_inbuf(): receive_topicwindow at AP reached 0.");
return 0; /* don't process the inbuf any more */
}