mirror of
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/tor.git
synced 2024-11-24 20:33:31 +01:00
Fix a pair of stale comments in workqueue.c
These comments said that each thread had a separate queue, but we haven't been using that design for some while.
This commit is contained in:
parent
efadebf7c3
commit
bddea78ded
@ -113,9 +113,7 @@ struct replyqueue_s {
|
||||
alert_sockets_t alert;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
/** A worker thread represents a single thread in a thread pool. To avoid
|
||||
* contention, each gets its own queue. This breaks the guarantee that that
|
||||
* queued work will get executed strictly in order. */
|
||||
/** A worker thread represents a single thread in a thread pool. */
|
||||
typedef struct workerthread_s {
|
||||
/** Which thread it this? In range 0..in_pool->n_threads-1 */
|
||||
int index;
|
||||
@ -368,7 +366,7 @@ workerthread_new(int32_t lower_priority_chance,
|
||||
* take from the queued work with the highest prioirity, but will occasionally
|
||||
* visit lower-priority queues to keep them from starving completely.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Note that because each thread has its own work queue, work items may not
|
||||
* Note that because of priorities and thread behavior, work items may not
|
||||
* be executed strictly in order.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
workqueue_entry_t *
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user