nihilist/tor
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/tor.git synced 2024-11-10 21:23:58 +01:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Add a comment and a check for why flag indices will be <= 63

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Nick Mathewson 2013-07-08 11:35:06 -04:00
parent 15cd79f832
commit b34279d3ab
1 changed files with 10 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

11
src/or/dirvote.c
View File

@ -1590,10 +1590,19 @@ networkstatus_compute_consensus(smartlist_t *votes,
unnamed_flag[i] = named_flag[i] = -1;
chosen_named_idx = smartlist_string_pos(flags, "Named");
/* Build the flag index. */
/* Build the flag indexes. Note that no vote can have more than 64 members
* for known_flags, so no value will be greater than 63, so it's safe to
* do U64_LITERAL(1) << index on these values. But note also that
* named_flag and unnamed_flag are initialized to -1, so we need to check
* that they're actually set before doing U64_LITERAL(1) << index with
* them.*/
SMARTLIST_FOREACH_BEGIN(votes, networkstatus_t *, v) {
flag_map[v_sl_idx] = tor_malloc_zero(
sizeof(int)*smartlist_len(v->known_flags));
if (smartlist_len(v->known_flags) > MAX_KNOWN_FLAGS_IN_VOTE) {
log_warn(LD_BUG, "Somehow, a vote has %d entries in known_flags",
smartlist_len(v->known_flags));
}
SMARTLIST_FOREACH_BEGIN(v->known_flags, const char *, fl) {
int p = smartlist_string_pos(flags, fl);
tor_assert(p >= 0);