diff --git a/PADDING_TODO.txt b/PADDING_TODO.txt deleted file mode 100644 index a2e97f7ca3..0000000000 --- a/PADDING_TODO.txt +++ /dev/null @@ -1,58 +0,0 @@ -TODO sketch for this branch, in rough priority order: - -- Clean up/fix XXX's and FIXMEs - - Test event entry points into circuitpad? - - Most of our events come from completely untested code :/ - -- Compat-breaking changes to be decided/done ASAP - - Option to keep circuits open if machine present - - Specify an ordered preference list of padding machines - - Specify exit policy for machine conditions? - - short_policy_t looks good, except for its flexible array member :/ - - Can we make our own struct with a small, fixed number of policy - entries? Say 3-4? Or is that a bad idea to lose this flexibility? - - Check conditions based on attached streams on the circuit - - Accept should mean "only apply if matched" - - Reject should mean "don't apply if matched" - - If a policy is specified, Reject *:* is implicit default (so reject - policies need an Accept entry). - - With no policy, Accept *:* is implicit default. - - -- Misc fixes: - - Remove circuitsetup machine (but place it in unittests -- they depend on it) - - Circuit RTT measurement will break on var_cell/EXTEND2 cells - - Are there any heuristics we can use here? - - If RELAY_EARLY is only for the first cell of an EXTEND2 series, - we can use that. But the proposal currently says MAY, but not MUST - for this behavior. - -======== 0.3.6 ======== - -- Come up with some good histograms for eg circuit setup fingerprinting, - website fingerprinting, and vanguards usage. - -- Vanguards compatibility for MiddleNodes (via changes to vanguards addon) - -- circpad_machine_validate() function to sanity-check histograms loaded from - consensus/torrc (can also be used to help guide a GA). - - Check bin construction - - no type overflow (start_usec + range_sec, etc) - - no conflicting state transitions (or overlap with cancel events) - - no use of both histograms and iat_dist - - at least two histogram bins - - min_hop vs target_hop - -- Support torrc load+serialization of state machines - - ?? - -- Support consensus load+serialization of state machines - - ?? - -- Prop #265 load balancing - -- Rephist timer stats - - Is this a privacy risk? The adversary could create lots of circuits - to find a layer2 vanguard.. Otherwise they will be spread across middles. - -