Clarify chosen tag progression

svn:r3047
This commit is contained in:
Nick Mathewson 2004-11-30 16:07:20 +00:00
parent 3929f58018
commit a889926e1c

View File

@ -1644,17 +1644,14 @@ void clear_trusted_dir_servers(void);
* encounter two versions that differ only by status tag, we compare them * encounter two versions that differ only by status tag, we compare them
* lexically. * lexically.
* *
* Now, we start each development branch with (say) 0.1.1.1-cvs. The * Now, we start each development branch with (say) 0.1.1.1-alpha.
* patchlevel increments consistently as the status tag changes, for example, * The patchlevel increments consistently as the status tag changes,
* as in: 0.1.1.2-alpha, 0.1.1.3-cvs, 0.1.1.4-alpha, 0.1.1.5-cvs, 0.1.1.6-rc * for example, as in: 0.1.1.2-alpha, 0.1.1.3-alpha, 0.1.1.4-rc
* 0.1.1.7-cvs, 0.1.1.8-rc, 0.1.1.9-cvs. Eventually, we release 0.1.1.10. * 0.1.1.5-rc, Eventually, we release 0.1.1.6. The next patch release
* The stable CVS repository gets the version 0.1.1.11-maint_cvs; the * is 0.1.1.7.
* next patch release is 0.1.1.12.
* *
* XXXX(Alternatively, we could go: 0.1.1.1-alpha, 0.1.1.1-alpha_cvs, * Between these releases, CVS is versioned with a -cvs tag: after
* 0.1.1.2-alpha, 0.1.1.2-alpha_cvs . This wouldn't violate our * 0.1.1.1-alpha comes 0.1.1.1-alpha-cvs, and so on.
* only-one-release-per-number rule, since CVS versions aren't
* released. Roger?)
*/ */
typedef struct tor_version_t { typedef struct tor_version_t {
int major; int major;