mirror of
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/tor.git
synced 2024-11-27 22:03:31 +01:00
first thoughts on rate limiting stream creations at exits
svn:r13048
This commit is contained in:
parent
5a912aa1c8
commit
a516973275
63
doc/spec/proposals/ideas/xxx-rate-limit-exits.txt
Normal file
63
doc/spec/proposals/ideas/xxx-rate-limit-exits.txt
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
|
||||
|
||||
1. Overview
|
||||
|
||||
We should rate limit the volume of stream creations at exits:
|
||||
|
||||
2.1. Per-circuit limits
|
||||
|
||||
If a given circuit opens more than N streams in X seconds, further
|
||||
stream requests over the next Y seconds should fail with the reason
|
||||
'resourcelimit'. Clients will automatically notice this and switch to
|
||||
a new circuit.
|
||||
|
||||
The goal is to limit the effects of port scans on a given exit relay,
|
||||
so the relay's ISP won't get hassled as much.
|
||||
|
||||
First thoughts for parameters would be N=100 streams in X=5 seconds
|
||||
causes 30 seconds of fails; and N=300 streams in X=30 seconds causes
|
||||
30 seconds of fails.
|
||||
|
||||
We could simplify by, instead of having a "for 30 seconds" parameter,
|
||||
just marking the circuit as forever failing new requests. (We don't want
|
||||
to just close the circuit because it may still have open streams on it.)
|
||||
|
||||
2.2. Per-destination limits
|
||||
|
||||
If a given circuit opens more than N1 streams in X seconds to a single
|
||||
IP address, or all the circuits combined open more than N2 streams,
|
||||
then we should fail further attempts to reach that address for a while.
|
||||
|
||||
The goal is to limit the abuse that Tor exit relays can dish out
|
||||
to a single target either for socket DoS or for web crawling, in
|
||||
the hopes of a) not triggering their automated defenses, and b) not
|
||||
making them upset at Tor. Hopefully these self-imposed bans will be
|
||||
much shorter-lived than bans or barriers put up by the websites.
|
||||
|
||||
3. Issues
|
||||
|
||||
3.1. Circuit-creation overload
|
||||
|
||||
Making clients move to new circuits more often will cause more circuit
|
||||
creation requests.
|
||||
|
||||
3.2. How to pick the parameters?
|
||||
|
||||
If we pick the numbers too low, then popular sites are effectively
|
||||
cut out of Tor. If we pick them too high, we don't do much good.
|
||||
|
||||
Worse, picking them wrong isn't easy to fix, since the deployed Tor
|
||||
servers will ship with a certain set of numbers.
|
||||
|
||||
We could put numbers (or "general settings") in the networkstatus
|
||||
consensus, and Tor exits would adapt more dynamically.
|
||||
|
||||
We could also have a local config option about how aggressive this
|
||||
server should be with its parameters.
|
||||
|
||||
4. Client-side limitations
|
||||
|
||||
Perhaps the clients should have built-in rate limits too, so they avoid
|
||||
harrassing the servers by default?
|
||||
|
||||
Tricky if we want to get Tor clients in use at large enclaves.
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user