From 8af07e817ed3f9a25852724a4da8c4e07fff86a5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Roger Dingledine <arma@torproject.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 22:39:08 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] no: 'must not' is for things that actually break specified
 behavior. 'should not' is for things that you really oughtn't do, for your
 own good or for others' own good.

svn:r8544
---
 doc/dir-spec.txt | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/dir-spec.txt b/doc/dir-spec.txt
index a57d82d32b..dbf74d22d0 100644
--- a/doc/dir-spec.txt
+++ b/doc/dir-spec.txt
@@ -765,8 +765,6 @@ $Id$
    SHOULD NOT ever use a router in response to a user request for a router
    called "Unnamed".
 
-   [Should the above become MUST NOTs? -RD]
-
 6.2. Software versions
 
    An implementation of Tor SHOULD warn when it has fetched (or has