mirror of
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/tor.git
synced 2024-11-24 12:23:32 +01:00
added a section about how to deal with connectivity information in Blossom/Tor
svn:r3381
This commit is contained in:
parent
a6e91f8157
commit
8acf5bed3c
@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ In particular:
|
||||
and admission (which nodes are "recommended" for certain uses).
|
||||
|
||||
1c. [optional] We want to permit servers that can't route to all other
|
||||
servers, e.g. because they're behind NAT or otherwise firewalled.
|
||||
servers, e.g. because they're behind NAT or otherwise firewalled.*
|
||||
|
||||
2. Assumptions.
|
||||
|
||||
@ -95,3 +95,76 @@ which nodes bridge the networks.
|
||||
figurehead?
|
||||
- 'Extend policies' -- middleman doesn't really mean middleman, alas.
|
||||
|
||||
----------
|
||||
|
||||
(*) Regarding "Blossom: an unstructured overlay network for end-to-end
|
||||
connectivity."
|
||||
|
||||
In this section we address possible solutions to the problem of how to allow
|
||||
Tor routers in different transport domains to communicate.
|
||||
|
||||
First, we presume that for every interface between transport domains A and B,
|
||||
one Tor router T_A exists in transport domain A, one Tor router T_B exists in
|
||||
transport domain B, and (without loss of generality) T_A can open a persistent
|
||||
connection to T_B. Any Tor traffic between the two routers will occur over
|
||||
this connection, which effectively renders the routers equal partners in
|
||||
bridging between the two transport domains. We refer to the established link
|
||||
between two transport domains as a "bridge" (we use this term because there is
|
||||
no serious possibility of confusion with the notion of a layer 2 bridge).
|
||||
|
||||
Next, suppose that the universe consists of transport domains connected by
|
||||
persistent connections in this manner. An individual router can open multiple
|
||||
connections to routers within the same foreign transport domain, and it can
|
||||
establish separate connections to routers within multiple foreign transport
|
||||
domains.
|
||||
|
||||
As in regular Tor, each Blossom router pushes its descriptor to directory
|
||||
servers. These directory servers can be within the same transport domain, but
|
||||
they need not be. The trick is that if a directory server is in another
|
||||
transport domain, then that directory server must know through which Tor
|
||||
routers to send messages destined for the Tor router in question. Descriptors
|
||||
for Blossom routers held by the directory server must contain a special field
|
||||
for specifying a path through the overlay (i.e. an ordered list of router
|
||||
names/IDs) to a router in a foreign transport domain. (This field may be a set
|
||||
of paths rather than a single path.) A new router publishing to a directory
|
||||
server in a foreign transport should include a list of routers. This list
|
||||
should be either:
|
||||
|
||||
a. ...a list of routers to which the router has persistent connections, or, if
|
||||
the new router does not have any persistent connections,
|
||||
|
||||
b. ...a (not necessarily exhaustive) list of fellow routers that are in the
|
||||
same transport domain.
|
||||
|
||||
The directory server will be able to use this information to derive a path to
|
||||
the new router, as follows. If the new router used approach (a), then the
|
||||
directory server will define the same path(s) in the descriptors for the
|
||||
router(s) specified in the list, with the corresponding specified router
|
||||
appended to each path. If the new router used approach (b), then the directory
|
||||
server will define the same path(s) in the descriptors for the routers
|
||||
specified in the list. The directory server will then insert the newly defined
|
||||
path into the descriptor from the router.
|
||||
|
||||
If all directory servers are within the same transport domain, then the problem
|
||||
is solved: routers can exist within multiple transport domains, and as long as
|
||||
the network of transport domains is fully connected by bridges, any router will
|
||||
be able to access any other router in a foreign transport domain simply by
|
||||
extending along the path specified by the directory server. However, we want
|
||||
the system to be truly decentralized, which means not electing any particular
|
||||
transport domain to be the master domain in which entries are published.
|
||||
|
||||
Generally speaking, directory servers share information with each other about
|
||||
routers. In order for a directory server to share information with a directory
|
||||
server in a foreign transport domain to which it cannot speak directly, it must
|
||||
use Tor, which means referring to the other directory server by using a router
|
||||
in the foreign transport domain. However, in order to use Tor, it must be able
|
||||
to reach that router, which means that a descriptor for that router must exist
|
||||
in its table, along with a means of reaching it. Therefore, in order for a
|
||||
mutual exchange of information between routers in transport domain A and those
|
||||
in transport domain B to be possible, when routers in transport domain A cannot
|
||||
establish direct connections with routers in transport domain B, then some
|
||||
router in transport domain B must have pushed its descriptor to a directory
|
||||
server in transport domain A, so that the directory server in transport domain
|
||||
A can use that router to reach the directory server in transport domain B.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user