mirror of
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/tor.git
synced 2024-11-30 23:53:32 +01:00
Update proposal to match implementation.
This commit is contained in:
parent
0352d43917
commit
81dc435ffa
@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ Motivation
|
||||
|
||||
Implementation
|
||||
|
||||
Storing Build Times
|
||||
Gathering Build Times
|
||||
|
||||
Circuit build times are stored in the circular array
|
||||
'circuit_build_times' consisting of uint32_t elements as milliseconds.
|
||||
@ -30,8 +30,16 @@ Implementation
|
||||
too large, because it will make it difficult for clients to adapt to
|
||||
moving between different links.
|
||||
|
||||
From our observations, this value appears to be on the order of 1000,
|
||||
but is configurable in a #define NCIRCUITS_TO_OBSERVE.
|
||||
From our observations, the minimum value for a reasonable fit appears
|
||||
to be on the order of 500 (MIN_CIRCUITS_TO_OBSERVE). However, to keep
|
||||
a good fit over the long term, we store 5000 most recent circuits in
|
||||
the array (NCIRCUITS_TO_OBSERVE).
|
||||
|
||||
The Tor client will build test circuits at a rate of one per
|
||||
minute (BUILD_TIMES_TEST_FREQUENCY) up to the point of
|
||||
MIN_CIRCUITS_TO_OBSERVE. This allows a fresh Tor to have
|
||||
a CircuitBuildTimeout estimated within 8 hours after install,
|
||||
upgrade, or network change (see below).
|
||||
|
||||
Long Term Storage
|
||||
|
||||
@ -43,9 +51,9 @@ Implementation
|
||||
Example:
|
||||
|
||||
TotalBuildTimes 100
|
||||
CircuitBuildTimeBin 0 50
|
||||
CircuitBuildTimeBin 50 25
|
||||
CircuitBuildTimeBin 100 13
|
||||
CircuitBuildTimeBin 25 50
|
||||
CircuitBuildTimeBin 75 25
|
||||
CircuitBuildTimeBin 125 13
|
||||
...
|
||||
|
||||
Reading the histogram in will entail inserting <count> values
|
||||
@ -57,7 +65,12 @@ Implementation
|
||||
Learning the CircuitBuildTimeout
|
||||
|
||||
Based on studies of build times, we found that the distribution of
|
||||
circuit buildtimes appears to be a Pareto distribution.
|
||||
circuit buildtimes appears to be a Frechet distribution. However,
|
||||
estimators and quantile functions of the Frechet distribution are
|
||||
difficult to work with and slow to converge. So instead, since we
|
||||
are only interested in the accuracy of the tail, we approximate
|
||||
the tail of the distribution with a Pareto curve starting at
|
||||
the mode of the circuit build time sample set.
|
||||
|
||||
We will calculate the parameters for a Pareto distribution
|
||||
fitting the data using the estimators at
|
||||
@ -73,11 +86,8 @@ Implementation
|
||||
|
||||
Detecting Changing Network Conditions
|
||||
|
||||
We attempt to detect both network connectivty loss and drastic
|
||||
changes in the timeout characteristics. Network connectivity loss
|
||||
is detected by recording a timestamp every time Tor either completes
|
||||
a TLS connection or receives a cell. If this timestamp is more than
|
||||
90 seconds in the past, circuit timeouts are no longer counted.
|
||||
We attempt to detect both network connectivity loss and drastic
|
||||
changes in the timeout characteristics.
|
||||
|
||||
If more than MAX_RECENT_TIMEOUT_RATE (80%) of the past
|
||||
RECENT_CIRCUITS (20) time out, we assume the network connection
|
||||
@ -86,6 +96,11 @@ Implementation
|
||||
position on the Pareto Quartile function for the ratio of
|
||||
timeouts.
|
||||
|
||||
Network connectivity loss is detected by recording a timestamp every
|
||||
time Tor either completes a TLS connection or receives a cell. If
|
||||
this timestamp is more than CircuitBuildTimeout*RECENT_CIRCUITS/3
|
||||
seconds in the past, circuit timeouts are no longer counted.
|
||||
|
||||
Testing
|
||||
|
||||
After circuit build times, storage, and learning are implemented,
|
||||
@ -96,7 +111,18 @@ Implementation
|
||||
the python produces matches that which is output to the state file in Tor,
|
||||
and verify that the Pareto parameters and cutoff points also match.
|
||||
|
||||
Soft timeout vs Hard Timeout
|
||||
We will also verify that there are no unexpected large deviations from
|
||||
node selection, such as nodes from distant geographical locations being
|
||||
completely excluded.
|
||||
|
||||
Dealing with Timeouts
|
||||
|
||||
Timeouts should be counted as the expectation of the region of
|
||||
of the Pareto distribution beyond the cutoff. This is done by
|
||||
generating a random sample for each timeout at points on the
|
||||
curve beyond the current timeout cutoff.
|
||||
|
||||
Future Work
|
||||
|
||||
At some point, it may be desirable to change the cutoff from a
|
||||
single hard cutoff that destroys the circuit to a soft cutoff and
|
||||
@ -104,36 +130,9 @@ Implementation
|
||||
of a new circuit, and the hard cutoff triggers destruction of the
|
||||
circuit.
|
||||
|
||||
Good values for hard and soft cutoffs seem to be 80% and 60%
|
||||
respectively, but we should eventually justify this with observation.
|
||||
|
||||
When to Begin Calculation
|
||||
|
||||
The number of circuits to observe (NCIRCUITS_TO_CUTOFF) before
|
||||
changing the CircuitBuildTimeout will be tunable via a #define. From
|
||||
our measurements, a good value for NCIRCUITS_TO_CUTOFF appears to be
|
||||
on the order of 100.
|
||||
|
||||
Dealing with Timeouts
|
||||
|
||||
Timeouts should be counted as the expectation of the region of
|
||||
of the Pareto distribution beyond the cutoff. The proposal will
|
||||
be updated with this value soon.
|
||||
|
||||
Also, in the event of network failure, the observation mechanism
|
||||
should stop collecting timeout data.
|
||||
|
||||
Client Hints
|
||||
|
||||
Some research still needs to be done to provide initial values
|
||||
for CircuitBuildTimeout based on values learned from modem
|
||||
users, DSL users, Cable Modem users, and dedicated links. A
|
||||
radiobutton in Vidalia should eventually be provided that
|
||||
sets CircuitBuildTimeout to one of these values and also
|
||||
provide the option of purging all learned data, should any exist.
|
||||
|
||||
These values can either be published in the directory, or
|
||||
shipped hardcoded for a particular Tor version.
|
||||
It may also be beneficial to learn separate timeouts for each
|
||||
guard node, as they will have slightly different distributions.
|
||||
This will take longer to generate initial values though.
|
||||
|
||||
Issues
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user