Fix for small test networks: don't refuse to have any sampled guards.

Don't restrict the sample size if the network size is less than 20
guards.  Maybe we'll think of a better rule later on?
This commit is contained in:
Nick Mathewson 2016-11-29 12:48:32 -05:00
parent eac8b3f758
commit 80fa404625

View File

@ -891,6 +891,23 @@ num_reachable_filtered_guards(guard_selection_t *gs)
return n_reachable_filtered_guards;
}
/** Return the actual maximum size for the sample in <b>gs</b>,
* given that we know about <b>n_guards</b> total. */
static int
get_max_sample_size(guard_selection_t *gs,
int n_guards)
{
const int using_bridges = (gs->type == GS_TYPE_BRIDGE);
/* XXXX prop271 spec deviation with bridges, max_sample is "all of them" */
if (using_bridges)
return n_guards;
else if (n_guards < 20) // XXXX prop271 spec deviation
return n_guards;
else
return (int)(n_guards * get_max_sample_threshold());
}
/**
* Return a smartlist of the all the guards that are not currently
* members of the sample (GUARDS - SAMPLED_GUARDS). The elements of
@ -987,11 +1004,7 @@ entry_guards_expand_sample(guard_selection_t *gs)
int n_guards = 0;
smartlist_t *eligible_guards = get_eligible_guards(gs, &n_guards);
const int using_bridges = (gs->type == GS_TYPE_BRIDGE);
/* XXXX prop271 spec deviation with bridges, max_sample is "all of them" */
const int max_sample = using_bridges ? n_guards :
(int)(n_guards * get_max_sample_threshold());
const int max_sample = get_max_sample_size(gs, n_guards);
const int min_filtered_sample = get_min_filtered_sample_size();
log_info(LD_GUARD, "Expanding the sample guard set. We have %d guards "