mirror of
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/tor.git
synced 2024-11-24 04:13:28 +01:00
Merge branch 'maint-0.3.2'
This commit is contained in:
commit
7556636ac2
@ -2865,6 +2865,7 @@ dirvote_get_next_valid_after_time(void)
|
||||
if (tor_mem_is_zero((const char *) &voting_schedule,
|
||||
sizeof(voting_schedule))) {
|
||||
dirvote_recalculate_timing(get_options(), time(NULL));
|
||||
voting_schedule.created_on_demand = 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return voting_schedule.interval_starts;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -2892,7 +2893,13 @@ dirvote_act(const or_options_t *options, time_t now)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (!authdir_mode_v3(options))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
if (!voting_schedule.voting_starts) {
|
||||
tor_assert_nonfatal(voting_schedule.voting_starts);
|
||||
/* If we haven't initialized this object through this codeflow, we need to
|
||||
* recalculate the timings to match our vote. The reason to do that is if we
|
||||
* have a voting schedule initialized 1 minute ago, the voting timings might
|
||||
* not be aligned to what we should expect with "now". This is especially
|
||||
* true for TestingTorNetwork using smaller timings. */
|
||||
if (voting_schedule.created_on_demand) {
|
||||
char *keys = list_v3_auth_ids();
|
||||
authority_cert_t *c = get_my_v3_authority_cert();
|
||||
log_notice(LD_DIR, "Scheduling voting. Known authority IDs are %s. "
|
||||
|
@ -168,6 +168,13 @@ typedef struct {
|
||||
int have_fetched_missing_signatures;
|
||||
/* True iff we have published our consensus. */
|
||||
int have_published_consensus;
|
||||
|
||||
/* True iff this voting schedule was set on demand meaning not through the
|
||||
* normal vote operation of a dirauth or when a consensus is set. This only
|
||||
* applies to a directory authority that needs to recalculate the voting
|
||||
* timings only for the first vote even though this object was initilized
|
||||
* prior to voting. */
|
||||
int created_on_demand;
|
||||
} voting_schedule_t;
|
||||
|
||||
void dirvote_get_preferred_voting_intervals(vote_timing_t *timing_out);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user