mirror of
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/tor.git
synced 2024-11-28 06:13:31 +01:00
Refactor and consolidate addr/exit policies into a new policies.c.
Fix some minor bugs and memory leaks along the way. svn:r6246
This commit is contained in:
parent
74d35c8027
commit
6f08d121d9
@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ tor_SOURCES = buffers.c circuitbuild.c circuitlist.c \
|
||||
circuituse.c command.c config.c \
|
||||
connection.c connection_edge.c connection_or.c control.c \
|
||||
cpuworker.c directory.c dirserv.c dns.c hibernate.c main.c \
|
||||
onion.c relay.c rendcommon.c rendclient.c rendmid.c \
|
||||
onion.c policies.c relay.c rendcommon.c rendclient.c rendmid.c \
|
||||
rendservice.c rephist.c router.c routerlist.c routerparse.c \
|
||||
tor_main.c
|
||||
|
||||
@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ test_SOURCES = buffers.c circuitbuild.c circuitlist.c \
|
||||
circuituse.c command.c config.c \
|
||||
connection.c connection_edge.c connection_or.c control.c \
|
||||
cpuworker.c directory.c dirserv.c dns.c hibernate.c main.c \
|
||||
onion.c relay.c rendcommon.c rendclient.c rendmid.c \
|
||||
onion.c policies.c relay.c rendcommon.c rendclient.c rendmid.c \
|
||||
rendservice.c rephist.c router.c routerlist.c routerparse.c \
|
||||
test.c
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1079,7 +1079,7 @@ router_handles_some_port(routerinfo_t *router, smartlist_t *needed_ports)
|
||||
addr_policy_result_t r;
|
||||
port = *(uint16_t *)smartlist_get(needed_ports, i);
|
||||
tor_assert(port);
|
||||
r = router_compare_addr_to_addr_policy(0, port, router->exit_policy);
|
||||
r = compare_addr_to_addr_policy(0, port, router->exit_policy);
|
||||
if (r != ADDR_POLICY_REJECTED && r != ADDR_POLICY_PROBABLY_REJECTED)
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ circuit_stream_is_being_handled(connection_t *conn, uint16_t port, int min)
|
||||
if (conn) {
|
||||
ok = connection_ap_can_use_exit(conn, exitrouter);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
addr_policy_result_t r = router_compare_addr_to_addr_policy(
|
||||
addr_policy_result_t r = compare_addr_to_addr_policy(
|
||||
0, port, exitrouter->exit_policy);
|
||||
ok = r != ADDR_POLICY_REJECTED && r != ADDR_POLICY_PROBABLY_REJECTED;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
467
src/or/config.c
467
src/or/config.c
@ -367,9 +367,6 @@ static int check_nickname_list(const char *lst, const char *name, char **msg);
|
||||
static void config_register_addressmaps(or_options_t *options);
|
||||
|
||||
static int parse_dir_server_line(const char *line, int validate_only);
|
||||
static int config_cmp_single_addr_policy(addr_policy_t *a, addr_policy_t *b);
|
||||
static int config_addr_policy_covers(addr_policy_t *a, addr_policy_t *b);
|
||||
static int config_addr_policy_intersects(addr_policy_t *a, addr_policy_t *b);
|
||||
static int parse_redirect_line(smartlist_t *result,
|
||||
config_line_t *line, char **msg);
|
||||
static int parse_log_severity_range(const char *range, int *min_out,
|
||||
@ -392,7 +389,6 @@ static int or_state_validate(or_state_t *old_options, or_state_t *options,
|
||||
static uint64_t config_parse_memunit(const char *s, int *ok);
|
||||
static int config_parse_interval(const char *s, int *ok);
|
||||
static void print_cvs_version(void);
|
||||
static void parse_reachable_addresses(void);
|
||||
static void init_libevent(void);
|
||||
static int opt_streq(const char *s1, const char *s2);
|
||||
#if defined(HAVE_EVENT_GET_VERSION) && defined(HAVE_EVENT_GET_METHOD)
|
||||
@ -441,12 +437,6 @@ static or_options_t *global_options = NULL;
|
||||
static char *torrc_fname = NULL;
|
||||
/** Persistent serialized state. */
|
||||
static or_state_t *global_state = NULL;
|
||||
/** Parsed addr_policy_t describing which addresses we believe we can start
|
||||
* circuits at. */
|
||||
static addr_policy_t *reachable_or_addr_policy = NULL;
|
||||
/** Parsed addr_policy_t describing which addresses we believe we can connect
|
||||
* to directories at. */
|
||||
static addr_policy_t *reachable_dir_addr_policy = NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
/** Allocate an empty configuration object of a given format type. */
|
||||
static void *
|
||||
@ -507,14 +497,6 @@ config_free_all(void)
|
||||
global_state = NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
tor_free(torrc_fname);
|
||||
if (reachable_or_addr_policy) {
|
||||
addr_policy_free(reachable_or_addr_policy);
|
||||
reachable_or_addr_policy = NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (reachable_dir_addr_policy) {
|
||||
addr_policy_free(reachable_dir_addr_policy);
|
||||
reachable_dir_addr_policy = NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** If options->SafeLogging is on, return a not very useful string,
|
||||
@ -763,10 +745,7 @@ options_act(or_options_t *old_options)
|
||||
config_register_addressmaps(options);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Update address policies. */
|
||||
parse_socks_policy();
|
||||
parse_dir_policy();
|
||||
parse_authdir_policy();
|
||||
parse_reachable_addresses();
|
||||
policies_parse_from_options(options);
|
||||
|
||||
init_cookie_authentication(options->CookieAuthentication);
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1976,98 +1955,6 @@ validate_ports_csv(smartlist_t *sl, const char *name, char **msg)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Helper: parse the Reachable(Dir|OR)?Addresses fields into
|
||||
* reachable_(or|dir)_addr_policy. */
|
||||
static void
|
||||
parse_reachable_addresses(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
or_options_t *options = get_options();
|
||||
|
||||
if (options->ReachableDirAddresses &&
|
||||
options->ReachableORAddresses &&
|
||||
options->ReachableAddresses) {
|
||||
log_warn(LD_CONFIG,
|
||||
"Both ReachableDirAddresses and ReachableORAddresses are set. "
|
||||
"ReachableAddresses setting will be ignored.");
|
||||
}
|
||||
addr_policy_free(reachable_or_addr_policy);
|
||||
reachable_or_addr_policy = NULL;
|
||||
if (!options->ReachableORAddresses && options->ReachableAddresses)
|
||||
log_info(LD_CONFIG,
|
||||
"Using ReachableAddresses as ReachableORAddresses.");
|
||||
if (config_parse_addr_policy(options->ReachableORAddresses ?
|
||||
options->ReachableORAddresses :
|
||||
options->ReachableAddresses,
|
||||
&reachable_or_addr_policy,
|
||||
ADDR_POLICY_ACCEPT)) {
|
||||
log_warn(LD_CONFIG,
|
||||
"Error parsing Reachable%sAddresses entry; ignoring.",
|
||||
options->ReachableORAddresses ? "OR" : "");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
addr_policy_free(reachable_dir_addr_policy);
|
||||
reachable_dir_addr_policy = NULL;
|
||||
if (!options->ReachableDirAddresses && options->ReachableAddresses)
|
||||
log_info(LD_CONFIG,
|
||||
"Using ReachableAddresses as ReachableDirAddresses");
|
||||
if (config_parse_addr_policy(options->ReachableDirAddresses ?
|
||||
options->ReachableDirAddresses :
|
||||
options->ReachableAddresses,
|
||||
&reachable_dir_addr_policy,
|
||||
ADDR_POLICY_ACCEPT)) {
|
||||
if (options->ReachableDirAddresses)
|
||||
log_warn(LD_CONFIG,
|
||||
"Error parsing ReachableDirAddresses entry; ignoring.");
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Return true iff the firewall options might block any address:port
|
||||
* combination.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
int
|
||||
firewall_is_fascist_or(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return !!reachable_or_addr_policy;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Return true iff <b>policy</b> (possibly NULL) will allow a
|
||||
* connection to <b>addr</b>:<b>port</b>.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static int
|
||||
_fascist_firewall_allows_address(uint32_t addr, uint16_t port,
|
||||
addr_policy_t *policy)
|
||||
{
|
||||
addr_policy_result_t p;
|
||||
|
||||
p = router_compare_addr_to_addr_policy(addr, port, policy);
|
||||
|
||||
switch (p) {
|
||||
case ADDR_POLICY_PROBABLY_ACCEPTED:
|
||||
case ADDR_POLICY_ACCEPTED:
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
case ADDR_POLICY_PROBABLY_REJECTED:
|
||||
case ADDR_POLICY_REJECTED:
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
default:
|
||||
log_warn(LD_BUG, "Unexpected result: %d", (int)p);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int
|
||||
fascist_firewall_allows_address_or(uint32_t addr, uint16_t port)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return _fascist_firewall_allows_address(addr, port,
|
||||
reachable_or_addr_policy);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int
|
||||
fascist_firewall_allows_address_dir(uint32_t addr, uint16_t port)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return _fascist_firewall_allows_address(addr, port,
|
||||
reachable_dir_addr_policy);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Lowest allowable value for DirFetchPeriod; if this is too low, clients can
|
||||
* overload the directory system. */
|
||||
#define MIN_DIR_FETCH_PERIOD (10*60)
|
||||
@ -2104,7 +1991,6 @@ options_validate(or_options_t *old_options, or_options_t *options,
|
||||
{
|
||||
int i, r;
|
||||
config_line_t *cl;
|
||||
addr_policy_t *addr_policy=NULL;
|
||||
const char *uname;
|
||||
char buf[1024];
|
||||
#define REJECT(arg) \
|
||||
@ -2539,33 +2425,8 @@ options_validate(or_options_t *old_options, or_options_t *options,
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (config_parse_exit_policy(options->ExitPolicy, &addr_policy,
|
||||
options->ExitPolicyRejectPrivate))
|
||||
REJECT("Error in ExitPolicy entry.");
|
||||
|
||||
/* The rest of these calls *append* to addr_policy. So don't actually
|
||||
* use the results for anything other than checking if they parse! */
|
||||
if (config_parse_addr_policy(options->DirPolicy, &addr_policy, -1))
|
||||
REJECT("Error in DirPolicy entry.");
|
||||
if (config_parse_addr_policy(options->SocksPolicy, &addr_policy, -1))
|
||||
REJECT("Error in SocksPolicy entry.");
|
||||
if (config_parse_addr_policy(options->ReachableAddresses, &addr_policy,
|
||||
ADDR_POLICY_ACCEPT))
|
||||
REJECT("Error in ReachableAddresses entry.");
|
||||
if (config_parse_addr_policy(options->ReachableORAddresses, &addr_policy,
|
||||
ADDR_POLICY_ACCEPT))
|
||||
REJECT("Error in ReachableORAddresses entry.");
|
||||
if (config_parse_addr_policy(options->ReachableDirAddresses, &addr_policy,
|
||||
ADDR_POLICY_ACCEPT))
|
||||
REJECT("Error in ReachableDirAddresses entry.");
|
||||
if (config_parse_addr_policy(options->AuthDirReject, &addr_policy,
|
||||
ADDR_POLICY_REJECT))
|
||||
REJECT("Error in AuthDirReject entry.");
|
||||
if (config_parse_addr_policy(options->AuthDirInvalid, &addr_policy,
|
||||
ADDR_POLICY_REJECT))
|
||||
REJECT("Error in AuthDirInvalid entry.");
|
||||
|
||||
addr_policy_free(addr_policy);
|
||||
if (validate_addr_policies(options, msg) < 0)
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
|
||||
for (cl = options->RedirectExit; cl; cl = cl->next) {
|
||||
if (parse_redirect_line(NULL, cl, msg)<0)
|
||||
@ -3261,326 +3122,6 @@ normalize_log_options(or_options_t *options)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Add the exit policy described by <b>more</b> to <b>policy</b>.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static void
|
||||
options_append_exit_policy_string(addr_policy_t **policy, const char *more)
|
||||
{
|
||||
config_line_t tmp;
|
||||
|
||||
tmp.key = NULL;
|
||||
tmp.value = (char*) more;
|
||||
tmp.next = NULL;
|
||||
config_parse_addr_policy(&tmp, policy, -1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int
|
||||
config_expand_exit_policy_aliases(smartlist_t *entries, int assume_action)
|
||||
{
|
||||
static const char *prefixes[] = {
|
||||
"0.0.0.0/8", "169.254.0.0/16",
|
||||
"127.0.0.0/8", "192.168.0.0/16", "10.0.0.0/8", "172.16.0.0/12",NULL };
|
||||
int i;
|
||||
char *pre=NULL, *post=NULL;
|
||||
int expanded_any = 0;
|
||||
pre = smartlist_join_strings(entries,",",0,NULL);
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < smartlist_len(entries); ++i) {
|
||||
char *v = smartlist_get(entries, i);
|
||||
const char *cp, *ports;
|
||||
const char *action;
|
||||
int prefix_idx;
|
||||
if (!strcasecmpstart(v, "accept")) {
|
||||
action = "accept ";
|
||||
cp = v+strlen("accept");
|
||||
} else if (!strcasecmpstart(v, "reject")) {
|
||||
action = "reject ";
|
||||
cp = v+strlen("reject");
|
||||
} else if (assume_action >= 0) {
|
||||
action = "";
|
||||
cp = v;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
log_warn(LD_CONFIG,"Policy '%s' didn't start with accept or reject.", v);
|
||||
tor_free(pre);
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
cp = eat_whitespace(cp);
|
||||
if (strcmpstart(cp, "private"))
|
||||
continue; /* No need to expand. */
|
||||
cp += strlen("private");
|
||||
cp = eat_whitespace(cp);
|
||||
if (*cp && *cp != ':')
|
||||
continue; /* It wasn't "private" after all. */
|
||||
ports = cp;
|
||||
/* Okay. We're going to replace entries[i] with a bunch of new entries,
|
||||
* in order. */
|
||||
smartlist_del_keeporder(entries, i);
|
||||
for (prefix_idx = 0; prefixes[prefix_idx]; ++prefix_idx) {
|
||||
size_t replacement_len = 16+strlen(prefixes[prefix_idx])+strlen(ports);
|
||||
char *replacement = tor_malloc(replacement_len);
|
||||
tor_snprintf(replacement, replacement_len, "%s%s%s",
|
||||
action, prefixes[prefix_idx], ports);
|
||||
smartlist_insert(entries, i++, replacement);
|
||||
}
|
||||
tor_free(v);
|
||||
expanded_any = 1;
|
||||
--i;
|
||||
}
|
||||
post = smartlist_join_strings(entries,",",0,NULL);
|
||||
if (expanded_any)
|
||||
log_info(LD_CONFIG, "Expanded '%s' to '%s'", pre, post);
|
||||
tor_free(pre);
|
||||
tor_free(post);
|
||||
return expanded_any;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Detect and excise "dead code" from the policy *<b>dest</b>. */
|
||||
static void
|
||||
config_exit_policy_remove_redundancies(addr_policy_t **dest)
|
||||
{
|
||||
addr_policy_t *ap, *tmp, *victim, *previous;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Step one: find a *:* entry and cut off everything after it. */
|
||||
for (ap=*dest; ap; ap=ap->next) {
|
||||
if (ap->msk == 0 && ap->prt_min <= 1 && ap->prt_max >= 65535) {
|
||||
/* This is a catch-all line -- later lines are unreachable. */
|
||||
if (ap->next) {
|
||||
addr_policy_free(ap->next);
|
||||
ap->next = NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Step two: for every entry, see if there's a redundant entry
|
||||
* later on, and remove it. */
|
||||
for (ap=*dest; ap; ap=ap->next) {
|
||||
tmp=ap;
|
||||
while (tmp) {
|
||||
if (tmp->next && config_addr_policy_covers(ap, tmp->next)) {
|
||||
log(LOG_INFO, LD_CONFIG, "Removing exit policy %s. It is made "
|
||||
"redundant by %s.", tmp->next->string, ap->string);
|
||||
victim = tmp->next;
|
||||
tmp->next = victim->next;
|
||||
victim->next = NULL;
|
||||
addr_policy_free(victim);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
tmp=tmp->next;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Step three: for every entry A, see if there's an entry B making this one
|
||||
* redundant later on. This is the case if A and B are of the same type
|
||||
* (accept/reject), A is a subset of B, and there is no other entry of
|
||||
* different type in between those two that intersects with A.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Anybody want to doublecheck the logic here? XXX
|
||||
*/
|
||||
ap = *dest;
|
||||
previous = NULL;
|
||||
while (ap) {
|
||||
for (tmp=ap->next; tmp; tmp=tmp->next) {
|
||||
if (ap->policy_type != tmp->policy_type &&
|
||||
config_addr_policy_intersects(ap, tmp)) {
|
||||
tmp = NULL; /* so that we advance previous and ap */
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (ap->policy_type == tmp->policy_type &&
|
||||
config_addr_policy_covers(tmp, ap)) {
|
||||
log(LOG_INFO, LD_CONFIG, "Removing exit policy %s. It is made "
|
||||
"redundant by %s.", ap->string, tmp->string);
|
||||
victim = ap;
|
||||
ap = ap->next;
|
||||
|
||||
if (previous) {
|
||||
assert(previous->next == victim);
|
||||
previous->next = victim->next;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
assert(*dest == victim);
|
||||
*dest = victim->next;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
victim->next = NULL;
|
||||
addr_policy_free(victim);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!tmp) {
|
||||
previous = ap;
|
||||
ap = ap->next;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#define DEFAULT_EXIT_POLICY \
|
||||
"reject *:25,reject *:119,reject *:135-139,reject *:445," \
|
||||
"reject *:465,reject *:587,reject *:1214,reject *:4661-4666," \
|
||||
"reject *:6346-6429,reject *:6699,reject *:6881-6999,accept *:*"
|
||||
|
||||
/** Parse the exit policy <b>cfg</b> into the linked list *<b>dest</b>. If
|
||||
* cfg doesn't end in an absolute accept or reject, add the default exit
|
||||
* policy afterwards. If <b>rejectprivate</b> is true, prepend
|
||||
* "reject private:*" to the policy. Return -1 if we can't parse cfg,
|
||||
* else return 0.
|
||||
*
|
||||
*/
|
||||
int
|
||||
config_parse_exit_policy(config_line_t *cfg, addr_policy_t **dest,
|
||||
int rejectprivate)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (rejectprivate)
|
||||
options_append_exit_policy_string(dest, "reject private:*");
|
||||
if (config_parse_addr_policy(cfg, dest, -1))
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
options_append_exit_policy_string(dest, DEFAULT_EXIT_POLICY);
|
||||
|
||||
config_exit_policy_remove_redundancies(dest);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Given a linked list of config lines containing "allow" and "deny" tokens,
|
||||
* parse them and append the result to <b>dest</b>. Return -1 if any tokens
|
||||
* are malformed, else return 0.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
int
|
||||
config_parse_addr_policy(config_line_t *cfg,
|
||||
addr_policy_t **dest,
|
||||
int assume_action)
|
||||
{
|
||||
addr_policy_t **nextp;
|
||||
smartlist_t *entries;
|
||||
int r = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!cfg)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
nextp = dest;
|
||||
|
||||
while (*nextp)
|
||||
nextp = &((*nextp)->next);
|
||||
|
||||
entries = smartlist_create();
|
||||
for (; cfg; cfg = cfg->next) {
|
||||
smartlist_split_string(entries, cfg->value, ",",
|
||||
SPLIT_SKIP_SPACE|SPLIT_IGNORE_BLANK, 0);
|
||||
if (config_expand_exit_policy_aliases(entries,assume_action)<0) {
|
||||
r = -1;
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
SMARTLIST_FOREACH(entries, const char *, ent,
|
||||
{
|
||||
log_debug(LD_CONFIG,"Adding new entry '%s'",ent);
|
||||
*nextp = router_parse_addr_policy_from_string(ent, assume_action);
|
||||
if (*nextp) {
|
||||
if (addr_mask_get_bits((*nextp)->msk)<0) {
|
||||
log_warn(LD_CONFIG, "Address policy element '%s' can't be expressed "
|
||||
"as a bit prefix.", ent);
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* Advance nextp to the end of the policy. */
|
||||
while (*nextp)
|
||||
nextp = &((*nextp)->next);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
log_warn(LD_CONFIG,"Malformed policy '%s'.", ent);
|
||||
r = -1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
SMARTLIST_FOREACH(entries, char *, ent, tor_free(ent));
|
||||
smartlist_clear(entries);
|
||||
}
|
||||
smartlist_free(entries);
|
||||
return r;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Compare two provided address policy items, and return -1, 0, or 1
|
||||
* if the first is less than, equal to, or greater than the second. */
|
||||
static int
|
||||
config_cmp_single_addr_policy(addr_policy_t *a, addr_policy_t *b)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int r;
|
||||
if ((r=((int)a->policy_type - (int)b->policy_type)))
|
||||
return r;
|
||||
if ((r=((int)a->addr - (int)b->addr)))
|
||||
return r;
|
||||
if ((r=((int)a->msk - (int)b->msk)))
|
||||
return r;
|
||||
if ((r=((int)a->prt_min - (int)b->prt_min)))
|
||||
return r;
|
||||
if ((r=((int)a->prt_max - (int)b->prt_max)))
|
||||
return r;
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Return true iff the address policy <b>a</b> covers every case that would be
|
||||
* covered by <b>b</b>, so that a,b is redundant. */
|
||||
static int
|
||||
config_addr_policy_covers(addr_policy_t *a, addr_policy_t *b)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
||||
/* We can ignore accept/reject, since "accept *:80, reject *:80" reduces to
|
||||
* "accept *:80". */
|
||||
if (a->msk & ~b->msk) {
|
||||
/* There's a wildcard bit in b->msk that's not a wildcard in a. */
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if ((a->addr & a->msk) != (b->addr & a->msk)) {
|
||||
/* There's a fixed bit in a that's set differently in b. */
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return (a->prt_min <= b->prt_min && a->prt_max >= b->prt_max);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Return true iff the address policies <b>a</b> and <b>b</b> intersect, that
|
||||
* is, there exists an address/port that is covered by <b>a</b> that is also
|
||||
* covered by <b>b</b>.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static int
|
||||
config_addr_policy_intersects(addr_policy_t *a, addr_policy_t *b)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* All the bits we care about are those that are set in both
|
||||
* netmasks. If they are equal in a and b's networkaddresses
|
||||
* then the networks intersect. If there is a difference,
|
||||
* then they do not. */
|
||||
if (((a->addr ^ b->addr) & a->msk & b->msk) != 0)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
if (a->prt_max < b->prt_min || b->prt_max < a->prt_min)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Like config_cmp_single_addr_policy() above, but looks at the
|
||||
* whole set of policies in each case. */
|
||||
int
|
||||
config_cmp_addr_policies(addr_policy_t *a, addr_policy_t *b)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int r;
|
||||
while (a && b) {
|
||||
if ((r=config_cmp_single_addr_policy(a,b)))
|
||||
return r;
|
||||
a = a->next;
|
||||
b = b->next;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!a && !b)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
if (a)
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
else
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Release all storage held by <b>p</b> */
|
||||
void
|
||||
addr_policy_free(addr_policy_t *p)
|
||||
{
|
||||
addr_policy_t *e;
|
||||
|
||||
while (p) {
|
||||
e = p;
|
||||
p = p->next;
|
||||
tor_free(e->string);
|
||||
tor_free(e);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Parse a single RedirectExit line's contents from <b>line</b>. If
|
||||
* they are valid, and <b>result</b> is not NULL, add an element to
|
||||
* <b>result</b> and return 0. Else if they are valid, return 0.
|
||||
@ -4333,6 +3874,7 @@ print_cvs_version(void)
|
||||
extern const char hibernate_c_id[];
|
||||
extern const char main_c_id[];
|
||||
extern const char onion_c_id[];
|
||||
extern const char policies_c_id[];
|
||||
extern const char relay_c_id[];
|
||||
extern const char rendclient_c_id[];
|
||||
extern const char rendcommon_c_id[];
|
||||
@ -4381,6 +3923,7 @@ print_cvs_version(void)
|
||||
puts(hibernate_c_id);
|
||||
puts(main_c_id);
|
||||
puts(onion_c_id);
|
||||
puts(policies_c_id);
|
||||
puts(relay_c_id);
|
||||
puts(rendclient_c_id);
|
||||
puts(rendcommon_c_id);
|
||||
|
@ -13,7 +13,6 @@ const char connection_edge_c_id[] =
|
||||
|
||||
#include "or.h"
|
||||
|
||||
static addr_policy_t *socks_policy = NULL;
|
||||
/* List of exit_redirect_t */
|
||||
static smartlist_t *redirect_exit_list = NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1809,64 +1808,14 @@ connection_ap_can_use_exit(connection_t *conn, routerinfo_t *exit)
|
||||
addr_policy_result_t r;
|
||||
if (tor_inet_aton(conn->socks_request->address, &in))
|
||||
addr = ntohl(in.s_addr);
|
||||
r = router_compare_addr_to_addr_policy(addr, conn->socks_request->port,
|
||||
exit->exit_policy);
|
||||
r = compare_addr_to_addr_policy(addr, conn->socks_request->port,
|
||||
exit->exit_policy);
|
||||
if (r == ADDR_POLICY_REJECTED || r == ADDR_POLICY_PROBABLY_REJECTED)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** A helper function for socks_policy_permits_address() below.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Parse options->SocksPolicy in the same way that the exit policy
|
||||
* is parsed, and put the processed version in socks_policy.
|
||||
* Ignore port specifiers.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
void
|
||||
parse_socks_policy(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
addr_policy_t *n;
|
||||
if (socks_policy) {
|
||||
addr_policy_free(socks_policy);
|
||||
socks_policy = NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
config_parse_addr_policy(get_options()->SocksPolicy, &socks_policy, -1);
|
||||
/* ports aren't used. */
|
||||
for (n=socks_policy; n; n = n->next) {
|
||||
n->prt_min = 1;
|
||||
n->prt_max = 65535;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Free all storage held by our SOCKS allow policy
|
||||
*/
|
||||
void
|
||||
free_socks_policy(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
addr_policy_free(socks_policy);
|
||||
socks_policy = NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Return 1 if <b>addr</b> is permitted to connect to our socks port,
|
||||
* based on <b>socks_policy</b>. Else return 0.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
int
|
||||
socks_policy_permits_address(uint32_t addr)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int a;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!socks_policy) /* 'no socks policy' means 'accept' */
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
a = router_compare_addr_to_addr_policy(addr, 1, socks_policy);
|
||||
if (a==ADDR_POLICY_REJECTED)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
else if (a==ADDR_POLICY_ACCEPTED)
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
log_warn(LD_BUG, "Bug: Got unexpected 'maybe' answer from socks policy");
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Make connection redirection follow the provided list of
|
||||
* exit_redirect_t */
|
||||
void
|
||||
|
@ -54,60 +54,12 @@ static void note_request(const char *key, size_t bytes);
|
||||
|
||||
/********* START VARIABLES **********/
|
||||
|
||||
static addr_policy_t *dir_policy = NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
/** How far in the future do we allow a directory server to tell us it is
|
||||
* before deciding that one of us has the wrong time? */
|
||||
#define ALLOW_DIRECTORY_TIME_SKEW (30*60)
|
||||
|
||||
/********* END VARIABLES ************/
|
||||
|
||||
/** Parse get_options()->DirPolicy, and put the processed version in
|
||||
* &dir_policy. Ignore port specifiers.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
void
|
||||
parse_dir_policy(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
addr_policy_t *n;
|
||||
if (dir_policy) {
|
||||
addr_policy_free(dir_policy);
|
||||
dir_policy = NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
config_parse_addr_policy(get_options()->DirPolicy, &dir_policy, -1);
|
||||
/* ports aren't used. */
|
||||
for (n=dir_policy; n; n = n->next) {
|
||||
n->prt_min = 1;
|
||||
n->prt_max = 65535;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Free storage used to hold parsed directory policy */
|
||||
void
|
||||
free_dir_policy(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
addr_policy_free(dir_policy);
|
||||
dir_policy = NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Return 1 if <b>addr</b> is permitted to connect to our dir port,
|
||||
* based on <b>dir_policy</b>. Else return 0.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
int
|
||||
dir_policy_permits_address(uint32_t addr)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int a;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!dir_policy) /* 'no dir policy' means 'accept' */
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
a = router_compare_addr_to_addr_policy(addr, 1, dir_policy);
|
||||
if (a==ADDR_POLICY_REJECTED)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
else if (a==ADDR_POLICY_ACCEPTED)
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
log_warn(LD_BUG, "Bug: got unexpected 'maybe' answer from dir policy");
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Return true iff the directory purpose 'purpose' must use an
|
||||
* anonymous connection to a directory. */
|
||||
static int
|
||||
|
@ -41,7 +41,6 @@ static char *format_versions_list(config_line_t *ln);
|
||||
/* Should be static; exposed for testing */
|
||||
int add_fingerprint_to_dir(const char *nickname, const char *fp,
|
||||
smartlist_t *list);
|
||||
static int router_is_general_exit(routerinfo_t *ri);
|
||||
static router_status_t dirserv_router_get_status(const routerinfo_t *router,
|
||||
const char **msg);
|
||||
static router_status_t
|
||||
@ -55,40 +54,6 @@ static int dirserv_thinks_router_is_reachable(routerinfo_t *router,
|
||||
|
||||
/************** Fingerprint handling code ************/
|
||||
|
||||
static addr_policy_t *authdir_reject_policy = NULL;
|
||||
static addr_policy_t *authdir_invalid_policy = NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
/** Parse authdir policy strings from the configuration.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
void
|
||||
parse_authdir_policy(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
addr_policy_t *n;
|
||||
if (authdir_reject_policy) {
|
||||
addr_policy_free(authdir_reject_policy);
|
||||
authdir_reject_policy = NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
config_parse_addr_policy(get_options()->AuthDirReject,
|
||||
&authdir_reject_policy, ADDR_POLICY_REJECT);
|
||||
/* ports aren't used. */
|
||||
for (n=authdir_reject_policy; n; n = n->next) {
|
||||
n->prt_min = 1;
|
||||
n->prt_max = 65535;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (authdir_invalid_policy) {
|
||||
addr_policy_free(authdir_invalid_policy);
|
||||
authdir_invalid_policy = NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
config_parse_addr_policy(get_options()->AuthDirInvalid,
|
||||
&authdir_invalid_policy, ADDR_POLICY_REJECT);
|
||||
/* ports aren't used. */
|
||||
for (n=authdir_invalid_policy; n; n = n->next) {
|
||||
n->prt_min = 1;
|
||||
n->prt_max = 65535;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** A member of fingerprint_list: maps a name to a fingerprint.
|
||||
**/
|
||||
typedef struct fingerprint_entry_t {
|
||||
@ -320,12 +285,7 @@ dirserv_get_status_impl(const char *fp, const char *nickname,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (!nn_ent) { /* No such server known with that nickname */
|
||||
addr_policy_result_t rej = router_compare_addr_to_addr_policy(
|
||||
addr, or_port, authdir_reject_policy);
|
||||
addr_policy_result_t inv = router_compare_addr_to_addr_policy(
|
||||
addr, or_port, authdir_invalid_policy);
|
||||
|
||||
if (rej == ADDR_POLICY_PROBABLY_REJECTED || rej == ADDR_POLICY_REJECTED) {
|
||||
if (!authdir_policy_permits_address(addr, or_port)) {
|
||||
if (should_log)
|
||||
log_info(LD_DIRSERV, "Rejecting '%s' because of address '%s'",
|
||||
nickname, address);
|
||||
@ -333,7 +293,7 @@ dirserv_get_status_impl(const char *fp, const char *nickname,
|
||||
*msg = "Authdir is rejecting routers in this range.";
|
||||
return FP_REJECT;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (inv == ADDR_POLICY_PROBABLY_REJECTED || inv == ADDR_POLICY_REJECTED) {
|
||||
if (!authdir_policy_valid_address(addr, or_port)) {
|
||||
if (should_log)
|
||||
log_info(LD_DIRSERV, "Not marking '%s' valid because of address '%s'",
|
||||
nickname, address);
|
||||
@ -1203,33 +1163,6 @@ dirserv_get_runningrouters(const char **rr, int compress)
|
||||
"v1 network status list", 1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Return true iff <b>ri</b> is "useful as an exit node", meaning
|
||||
* it allows exit to at least one /8 address space for at least
|
||||
* one of ports 80, 443, and 6667. */
|
||||
static int
|
||||
router_is_general_exit(routerinfo_t *ri)
|
||||
{
|
||||
static const int ports[] = { 80, 443, 6667 };
|
||||
int n_allowed = 0;
|
||||
int i;
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < 3; ++i) {
|
||||
struct addr_policy_t *policy = ri->exit_policy;
|
||||
for ( ; policy; policy = policy->next) {
|
||||
if (policy->prt_min > ports[i] || policy->prt_max < ports[i])
|
||||
continue; /* Doesn't cover our port. */
|
||||
if ((policy->msk & 0x00fffffful) != 0)
|
||||
continue; /* Narrower than a /8. */
|
||||
if ((policy->addr & 0xff000000ul) == 0x7f000000ul)
|
||||
continue; /* 127.x */
|
||||
/* We have a match that is at least a /8. */
|
||||
if (policy->policy_type == ADDR_POLICY_ACCEPT)
|
||||
++n_allowed;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
return n_allowed > 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** For authoritative directories: the current (v2) network status */
|
||||
static cached_dir_t the_v2_networkstatus = { NULL, NULL, 0, 0, 0 };
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1416,7 +1349,7 @@ generate_v2_networkstatus(void)
|
||||
|
||||
SMARTLIST_FOREACH(rl->routers, routerinfo_t *, ri, {
|
||||
if (ri->cache_info.published_on >= cutoff) {
|
||||
int f_exit = router_is_general_exit(ri);
|
||||
int f_exit = exit_policy_is_general_exit(ri->exit_policy);
|
||||
int f_stable = ri->is_stable =
|
||||
!dirserv_thinks_router_is_unreliable(ri, 1, 0);
|
||||
int f_fast = ri->is_fast =
|
||||
@ -1721,10 +1654,6 @@ dirserv_free_all(void)
|
||||
smartlist_free(fingerprint_list);
|
||||
fingerprint_list = NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (authdir_reject_policy)
|
||||
addr_policy_free(authdir_reject_policy);
|
||||
if (authdir_invalid_policy)
|
||||
addr_policy_free(authdir_invalid_policy);
|
||||
clear_cached_dir(&the_directory);
|
||||
clear_cached_dir(&the_runningrouters);
|
||||
clear_cached_dir(&the_v2_networkstatus);
|
||||
|
@ -1531,8 +1531,6 @@ tor_free_all(int postfork)
|
||||
routerlist_free_all();
|
||||
addressmap_free_all();
|
||||
set_exit_redirects(NULL); /* free the registered exit redirects */
|
||||
free_socks_policy();
|
||||
free_dir_policy();
|
||||
dirserv_free_all();
|
||||
rend_service_free_all();
|
||||
rend_cache_free_all();
|
||||
@ -1542,6 +1540,7 @@ tor_free_all(int postfork)
|
||||
circuit_free_all();
|
||||
entry_guards_free_all();
|
||||
connection_free_all();
|
||||
policies_free_all();
|
||||
if (!postfork) {
|
||||
config_free_all();
|
||||
router_free_all();
|
||||
|
60
src/or/or.h
60
src/or/or.h
@ -1621,13 +1621,6 @@ int resolve_my_address(or_options_t *options, uint32_t *addr,
|
||||
void options_init(or_options_t *options);
|
||||
int options_init_from_torrc(int argc, char **argv);
|
||||
int options_init_logs(or_options_t *options, int validate_only);
|
||||
int config_parse_exit_policy(config_line_t *cfg,
|
||||
addr_policy_t **dest,
|
||||
int rejectprivate);
|
||||
int config_parse_addr_policy(config_line_t *cfg,
|
||||
addr_policy_t **dest,
|
||||
int assume_action);
|
||||
int config_cmp_addr_policies(addr_policy_t *a, addr_policy_t *b);
|
||||
void addr_policy_free(addr_policy_t *p);
|
||||
int option_is_recognized(const char *key);
|
||||
const char *option_get_canonical_name(const char *key);
|
||||
@ -1643,10 +1636,6 @@ int or_state_save(void);
|
||||
|
||||
int config_getinfo_helper(const char *question, char **answer);
|
||||
|
||||
int firewall_is_fascist_or(void);
|
||||
int fascist_firewall_allows_address_or(uint32_t addr, uint16_t port);
|
||||
int fascist_firewall_allows_address_dir(uint32_t addr, uint16_t port);
|
||||
|
||||
/********************************* connection.c ***************************/
|
||||
|
||||
const char *conn_type_to_string(int type);
|
||||
@ -1768,10 +1757,6 @@ void addressmap_get_mappings(smartlist_t *sl, time_t min_expires,
|
||||
int connection_ap_handshake_rewrite_and_attach(connection_t *conn,
|
||||
circuit_t *circ);
|
||||
|
||||
void parse_socks_policy(void);
|
||||
void free_socks_policy(void);
|
||||
int socks_policy_permits_address(uint32_t addr);
|
||||
|
||||
void set_exit_redirects(smartlist_t *lst);
|
||||
typedef enum hostname_type_t {
|
||||
NORMAL_HOSTNAME, ONION_HOSTNAME, EXIT_HOSTNAME, BAD_HOSTNAME
|
||||
@ -1888,7 +1873,6 @@ int assign_to_cpuworker(connection_t *cpuworker, uint8_t question_type,
|
||||
|
||||
/********************************* directory.c ***************************/
|
||||
|
||||
int dir_policy_permits_address(uint32_t addr);
|
||||
void directory_post_to_dirservers(uint8_t purpose, const char *payload,
|
||||
size_t payload_len);
|
||||
void directory_get_from_dirserver(uint8_t purpose, const char *resource,
|
||||
@ -1913,8 +1897,6 @@ int connection_dir_process_inbuf(connection_t *conn);
|
||||
int connection_dir_finished_flushing(connection_t *conn);
|
||||
int connection_dir_finished_connecting(connection_t *conn);
|
||||
void connection_dir_request_failed(connection_t *conn);
|
||||
void parse_dir_policy(void);
|
||||
void free_dir_policy(void);
|
||||
int dir_split_resource_into_fingerprints(const char *resource,
|
||||
smartlist_t *fp_out, int *compresseed_out,
|
||||
int decode_hex);
|
||||
@ -1922,7 +1904,6 @@ char *directory_dump_request_log(void);
|
||||
|
||||
/********************************* dirserv.c ***************************/
|
||||
|
||||
void parse_authdir_policy(void);
|
||||
int dirserv_add_own_fingerprint(const char *nickname, crypto_pk_env_t *pk);
|
||||
int dirserv_parse_fingerprint_file(const char *fname);
|
||||
void dirserv_free_fingerprint_list(void);
|
||||
@ -2047,6 +2028,37 @@ int fast_client_handshake(const char *handshake_state,
|
||||
|
||||
void clear_pending_onions(void);
|
||||
|
||||
/********************************* policies.c ************************/
|
||||
|
||||
typedef enum {
|
||||
ADDR_POLICY_ACCEPTED=0,
|
||||
ADDR_POLICY_REJECTED=-1,
|
||||
ADDR_POLICY_PROBABLY_ACCEPTED=1,
|
||||
ADDR_POLICY_PROBABLY_REJECTED=2
|
||||
} addr_policy_result_t;
|
||||
|
||||
int firewall_is_fascist_or(void);
|
||||
int fascist_firewall_allows_address_or(uint32_t addr, uint16_t port);
|
||||
int fascist_firewall_allows_address_dir(uint32_t addr, uint16_t port);
|
||||
int dir_policy_permits_address(uint32_t addr);
|
||||
int socks_policy_permits_address(uint32_t addr);
|
||||
int authdir_policy_permits_address(uint32_t addr, uint16_t port);
|
||||
int authdir_policy_valid_address(uint32_t addr, uint16_t port);
|
||||
|
||||
int validate_addr_policies(or_options_t *options, char **msg);
|
||||
void policies_parse_from_options(or_options_t *options);
|
||||
|
||||
int cmp_addr_policies(addr_policy_t *a, addr_policy_t *b);
|
||||
addr_policy_result_t compare_addr_to_addr_policy(uint32_t addr,
|
||||
uint16_t port, addr_policy_t *policy);
|
||||
int policies_parse_exit_policy(config_line_t *cfg,
|
||||
addr_policy_t **dest,
|
||||
int rejectprivate);
|
||||
int exit_policy_is_general_exit(addr_policy_t *policy);
|
||||
|
||||
void addr_policy_free(addr_policy_t *p);
|
||||
void policies_free_all(void);
|
||||
|
||||
/********************************* relay.c ***************************/
|
||||
|
||||
extern uint64_t stats_n_relay_cells_relayed;
|
||||
@ -2205,12 +2217,6 @@ int rend_mid_rendezvous(circuit_t *circ, const char *request,
|
||||
size_t request_len);
|
||||
|
||||
/********************************* router.c ***************************/
|
||||
typedef enum {
|
||||
ADDR_POLICY_ACCEPTED=0,
|
||||
ADDR_POLICY_REJECTED=-1,
|
||||
ADDR_POLICY_PROBABLY_ACCEPTED=1,
|
||||
ADDR_POLICY_PROBABLY_REJECTED=2
|
||||
} addr_policy_result_t;
|
||||
|
||||
void set_onion_key(crypto_pk_env_t *k);
|
||||
crypto_pk_env_t *get_onion_key(void);
|
||||
@ -2347,13 +2353,11 @@ typedef enum {
|
||||
int router_set_networkstatus(const char *s, time_t arrived_at,
|
||||
networkstatus_source_t source,
|
||||
smartlist_t *requested_fingerprints);
|
||||
addr_policy_result_t router_compare_addr_to_addr_policy(uint32_t addr,
|
||||
uint16_t port, addr_policy_t *policy);
|
||||
|
||||
int router_exit_policy_all_routers_reject(uint32_t addr, uint16_t port,
|
||||
int need_uptime);
|
||||
|
||||
int router_exit_policy_rejects_all(routerinfo_t *router);
|
||||
|
||||
void add_trusted_dir_server(const char *nickname,
|
||||
const char *address, uint16_t port,
|
||||
const char *digest, int supports_v1);
|
||||
|
661
src/or/policies.c
Normal file
661
src/or/policies.c
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,661 @@
|
||||
/* Copyright (c) 2001-2004, Roger Dingledine.
|
||||
* Copyright (c) 2004-2006, Roger Dingledine, Nick Mathewson. */
|
||||
/* See LICENSE for licensing information */
|
||||
/* $Id$ */
|
||||
const char policies_c_id[] = \
|
||||
"$Id$";
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* \file policies.c
|
||||
* \brief Code to parse and use address policies and exit policies.
|
||||
**/
|
||||
|
||||
#include "or.h"
|
||||
|
||||
static int expand_exit_policy_aliases(smartlist_t *entries, int assume_action);
|
||||
|
||||
static addr_policy_t *socks_policy = NULL;
|
||||
static addr_policy_t *dir_policy = NULL;
|
||||
static addr_policy_t *authdir_reject_policy = NULL;
|
||||
static addr_policy_t *authdir_invalid_policy = NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
/** Parsed addr_policy_t describing which addresses we believe we can start
|
||||
* circuits at. */
|
||||
static addr_policy_t *reachable_or_addr_policy = NULL;
|
||||
/** Parsed addr_policy_t describing which addresses we believe we can connect
|
||||
* to directories at. */
|
||||
static addr_policy_t *reachable_dir_addr_policy = NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Given a linked list of config lines containing "allow" and "deny"
|
||||
* tokens, parse them and append the result to <b>dest</b>. Return -1
|
||||
* if any tokens are malformed, else return 0.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static int
|
||||
parse_addr_policy(config_line_t *cfg, addr_policy_t **dest,
|
||||
int assume_action)
|
||||
{
|
||||
addr_policy_t **nextp;
|
||||
smartlist_t *entries;
|
||||
int r = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!cfg)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
nextp = dest;
|
||||
|
||||
while (*nextp)
|
||||
nextp = &((*nextp)->next);
|
||||
|
||||
entries = smartlist_create();
|
||||
for (; cfg; cfg = cfg->next) {
|
||||
smartlist_split_string(entries, cfg->value, ",",
|
||||
SPLIT_SKIP_SPACE|SPLIT_IGNORE_BLANK, 0);
|
||||
if (expand_exit_policy_aliases(entries,assume_action)<0) {
|
||||
r = -1;
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
SMARTLIST_FOREACH(entries, const char *, ent,
|
||||
{
|
||||
log_debug(LD_CONFIG,"Adding new entry '%s'",ent);
|
||||
*nextp = router_parse_addr_policy_from_string(ent, assume_action);
|
||||
if (*nextp) {
|
||||
if (addr_mask_get_bits((*nextp)->msk)<0) {
|
||||
log_warn(LD_CONFIG, "Address policy element '%s' can't be expressed "
|
||||
"as a bit prefix.", ent);
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* Advance nextp to the end of the policy. */
|
||||
while (*nextp)
|
||||
nextp = &((*nextp)->next);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
log_warn(LD_CONFIG,"Malformed policy '%s'.", ent);
|
||||
r = -1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
SMARTLIST_FOREACH(entries, char *, ent, tor_free(ent));
|
||||
smartlist_clear(entries);
|
||||
}
|
||||
smartlist_free(entries);
|
||||
return r;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Helper: parse the Reachable(Dir|OR)?Addresses fields into
|
||||
* reachable_(or|dir)_addr_policy. */
|
||||
static void
|
||||
parse_reachable_addresses(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
or_options_t *options = get_options();
|
||||
|
||||
if (options->ReachableDirAddresses &&
|
||||
options->ReachableORAddresses &&
|
||||
options->ReachableAddresses) {
|
||||
log_warn(LD_CONFIG,
|
||||
"Both ReachableDirAddresses and ReachableORAddresses are set. "
|
||||
"ReachableAddresses setting will be ignored.");
|
||||
}
|
||||
addr_policy_free(reachable_or_addr_policy);
|
||||
reachable_or_addr_policy = NULL;
|
||||
if (!options->ReachableORAddresses && options->ReachableAddresses)
|
||||
log_info(LD_CONFIG,
|
||||
"Using ReachableAddresses as ReachableORAddresses.");
|
||||
if (parse_addr_policy(options->ReachableORAddresses ?
|
||||
options->ReachableORAddresses :
|
||||
options->ReachableAddresses,
|
||||
&reachable_or_addr_policy, ADDR_POLICY_ACCEPT)) {
|
||||
log_warn(LD_CONFIG,
|
||||
"Error parsing Reachable%sAddresses entry; ignoring.",
|
||||
options->ReachableORAddresses ? "OR" : "");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
addr_policy_free(reachable_dir_addr_policy);
|
||||
reachable_dir_addr_policy = NULL;
|
||||
if (!options->ReachableDirAddresses && options->ReachableAddresses)
|
||||
log_info(LD_CONFIG,
|
||||
"Using ReachableAddresses as ReachableDirAddresses");
|
||||
if (parse_addr_policy(options->ReachableDirAddresses ?
|
||||
options->ReachableDirAddresses :
|
||||
options->ReachableAddresses,
|
||||
&reachable_dir_addr_policy, ADDR_POLICY_ACCEPT)) {
|
||||
if (options->ReachableDirAddresses)
|
||||
log_warn(LD_CONFIG,
|
||||
"Error parsing ReachableDirAddresses entry; ignoring.");
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Return true iff the firewall options might block any address:port
|
||||
* combination.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
int
|
||||
firewall_is_fascist_or(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return !!reachable_or_addr_policy;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Return true iff <b>policy</b> (possibly NULL) will allow a
|
||||
* connection to <b>addr</b>:<b>port</b>.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static int
|
||||
addr_policy_permits_address(uint32_t addr, uint16_t port,
|
||||
addr_policy_t *policy)
|
||||
{
|
||||
addr_policy_result_t p;
|
||||
p = compare_addr_to_addr_policy(addr, port, policy);
|
||||
switch (p) {
|
||||
case ADDR_POLICY_PROBABLY_ACCEPTED:
|
||||
case ADDR_POLICY_ACCEPTED:
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
case ADDR_POLICY_PROBABLY_REJECTED:
|
||||
case ADDR_POLICY_REJECTED:
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
default:
|
||||
log_warn(LD_BUG, "Unexpected result: %d", (int)p);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int
|
||||
fascist_firewall_allows_address_or(uint32_t addr, uint16_t port)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return addr_policy_permits_address(addr, port,
|
||||
reachable_or_addr_policy);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int
|
||||
fascist_firewall_allows_address_dir(uint32_t addr, uint16_t port)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return addr_policy_permits_address(addr, port,
|
||||
reachable_dir_addr_policy);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Return 1 if <b>addr</b> is permitted to connect to our dir port,
|
||||
* based on <b>dir_policy</b>. Else return 0.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
int
|
||||
dir_policy_permits_address(uint32_t addr)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return addr_policy_permits_address(addr, 1, dir_policy);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Return 1 if <b>addr</b> is permitted to connect to our socks port,
|
||||
* based on <b>socks_policy</b>. Else return 0.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
int
|
||||
socks_policy_permits_address(uint32_t addr)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return addr_policy_permits_address(addr, 1, socks_policy);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Return 1 if <b>addr</b>:<b>port</b> is permitted to publish to our
|
||||
* directory, based on <b>authdir_reject_policy</b>. Else return 0.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
int
|
||||
authdir_policy_permits_address(uint32_t addr, uint16_t port)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return addr_policy_permits_address(addr, port, authdir_reject_policy);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Return 1 if <b>addr</b>:<b>port</b> is considered valid in our
|
||||
* directory, based on <b>authdir_invalid_policy</b>. Else return 0.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
int
|
||||
authdir_policy_valid_address(uint32_t addr, uint16_t port)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return addr_policy_permits_address(addr, port, authdir_invalid_policy);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#define REJECT(arg) \
|
||||
do { *msg = tor_strdup(arg); goto err; } while (0)
|
||||
int
|
||||
validate_addr_policies(or_options_t *options, char **msg)
|
||||
{
|
||||
addr_policy_t *addr_policy=NULL;
|
||||
*msg = NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
if (policies_parse_exit_policy(options->ExitPolicy, &addr_policy,
|
||||
options->ExitPolicyRejectPrivate))
|
||||
REJECT("Error in ExitPolicy entry.");
|
||||
|
||||
/* The rest of these calls *append* to addr_policy. So don't actually
|
||||
* use the results for anything other than checking if they parse! */
|
||||
if (parse_addr_policy(options->DirPolicy, &addr_policy, -1))
|
||||
REJECT("Error in DirPolicy entry.");
|
||||
if (parse_addr_policy(options->SocksPolicy, &addr_policy, -1))
|
||||
REJECT("Error in SocksPolicy entry.");
|
||||
if (parse_addr_policy(options->ReachableAddresses, &addr_policy,
|
||||
ADDR_POLICY_ACCEPT))
|
||||
REJECT("Error in ReachableAddresses entry.");
|
||||
if (parse_addr_policy(options->ReachableORAddresses, &addr_policy,
|
||||
ADDR_POLICY_ACCEPT))
|
||||
REJECT("Error in ReachableORAddresses entry.");
|
||||
if (parse_addr_policy(options->ReachableDirAddresses, &addr_policy,
|
||||
ADDR_POLICY_ACCEPT))
|
||||
REJECT("Error in ReachableDirAddresses entry.");
|
||||
if (parse_addr_policy(options->AuthDirReject, &addr_policy,
|
||||
ADDR_POLICY_REJECT))
|
||||
REJECT("Error in AuthDirReject entry.");
|
||||
if (parse_addr_policy(options->AuthDirInvalid, &addr_policy,
|
||||
ADDR_POLICY_REJECT))
|
||||
REJECT("Error in AuthDirInvalid entry.");
|
||||
|
||||
err:
|
||||
addr_policy_free(addr_policy);
|
||||
return *msg ? -1 : 0;
|
||||
#undef REJECT
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Parse <b>string</b> in the same way that the exit policy
|
||||
* is parsed, and put the processed version in *<b>policy</b>.
|
||||
* Ignore port specifiers.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static void
|
||||
load_policy_from_option(config_line_t *config, addr_policy_t **policy,
|
||||
int assume_action)
|
||||
{
|
||||
addr_policy_t *n;
|
||||
addr_policy_free(*policy);
|
||||
*policy = NULL;
|
||||
parse_addr_policy(config, policy, assume_action);
|
||||
/* ports aren't used. */
|
||||
for (n=*policy; n; n = n->next) {
|
||||
n->prt_min = 1;
|
||||
n->prt_max = 65535;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void policies_parse_from_options(or_options_t *options)
|
||||
{
|
||||
load_policy_from_option(options->SocksPolicy, &socks_policy, -1);
|
||||
load_policy_from_option(options->DirPolicy, &dir_policy, -1);
|
||||
load_policy_from_option(options->AuthDirReject,
|
||||
&authdir_reject_policy, ADDR_POLICY_REJECT);
|
||||
load_policy_from_option(options->AuthDirInvalid,
|
||||
&authdir_invalid_policy, ADDR_POLICY_REJECT);
|
||||
parse_reachable_addresses();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
/** Compare two provided address policy items, and return -1, 0, or 1
|
||||
* if the first is less than, equal to, or greater than the second. */
|
||||
static int
|
||||
cmp_single_addr_policy(addr_policy_t *a, addr_policy_t *b)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int r;
|
||||
if ((r=((int)a->policy_type - (int)b->policy_type)))
|
||||
return r;
|
||||
if ((r=((int)a->addr - (int)b->addr)))
|
||||
return r;
|
||||
if ((r=((int)a->msk - (int)b->msk)))
|
||||
return r;
|
||||
if ((r=((int)a->prt_min - (int)b->prt_min)))
|
||||
return r;
|
||||
if ((r=((int)a->prt_max - (int)b->prt_max)))
|
||||
return r;
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Like cmp_single_addr_policy() above, but looks at the
|
||||
* whole set of policies in each case. */
|
||||
int
|
||||
cmp_addr_policies(addr_policy_t *a, addr_policy_t *b)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int r;
|
||||
while (a && b) {
|
||||
if ((r=cmp_single_addr_policy(a,b)))
|
||||
return r;
|
||||
a = a->next;
|
||||
b = b->next;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!a && !b)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
if (a)
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
else
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Decide whether a given addr:port is definitely accepted,
|
||||
* definitely rejected, probably accepted, or probably rejected by a
|
||||
* given policy. If <b>addr</b> is 0, we don't know the IP of the
|
||||
* target address. If <b>port</b> is 0, we don't know the port of the
|
||||
* target address.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* For now, the algorithm is pretty simple: we look for definite and
|
||||
* uncertain matches. The first definite match is what we guess; if
|
||||
* it was preceded by no uncertain matches of the opposite policy,
|
||||
* then the guess is definite; otherwise it is probable. (If we
|
||||
* have a known addr and port, all matches are definite; if we have an
|
||||
* unknown addr/port, any address/port ranges other than "all" are
|
||||
* uncertain.)
|
||||
*
|
||||
* We could do better by assuming that some ranges never match typical
|
||||
* addresses (127.0.0.1, and so on). But we'll try this for now.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
addr_policy_result_t
|
||||
compare_addr_to_addr_policy(uint32_t addr, uint16_t port,
|
||||
addr_policy_t *policy)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int maybe_reject = 0;
|
||||
int maybe_accept = 0;
|
||||
int match = 0;
|
||||
int maybe = 0;
|
||||
addr_policy_t *tmpe;
|
||||
|
||||
for (tmpe=policy; tmpe; tmpe=tmpe->next) {
|
||||
maybe = 0;
|
||||
if (!addr) {
|
||||
/* Address is unknown. */
|
||||
if ((port >= tmpe->prt_min && port <= tmpe->prt_max) ||
|
||||
(!port && tmpe->prt_min<=1 && tmpe->prt_max>=65535)) {
|
||||
/* The port definitely matches. */
|
||||
if (tmpe->msk == 0) {
|
||||
match = 1;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
maybe = 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else if (!port) {
|
||||
/* The port maybe matches. */
|
||||
maybe = 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
/* Address is known */
|
||||
if ((addr & tmpe->msk) == (tmpe->addr & tmpe->msk)) {
|
||||
if (port >= tmpe->prt_min && port <= tmpe->prt_max) {
|
||||
/* Exact match for the policy */
|
||||
match = 1;
|
||||
} else if (!port) {
|
||||
maybe = 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (maybe) {
|
||||
if (tmpe->policy_type == ADDR_POLICY_REJECT)
|
||||
maybe_reject = 1;
|
||||
else
|
||||
maybe_accept = 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (match) {
|
||||
if (tmpe->policy_type == ADDR_POLICY_ACCEPT) {
|
||||
/* If we already hit a clause that might trigger a 'reject', than we
|
||||
* can't be sure of this certain 'accept'.*/
|
||||
return maybe_reject ? ADDR_POLICY_PROBABLY_ACCEPTED :
|
||||
ADDR_POLICY_ACCEPTED;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
return maybe_accept ? ADDR_POLICY_PROBABLY_REJECTED :
|
||||
ADDR_POLICY_REJECTED;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* accept all by default. */
|
||||
return maybe_reject ? ADDR_POLICY_PROBABLY_ACCEPTED : ADDR_POLICY_ACCEPTED;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Return true iff the address policy <b>a</b> covers every case that
|
||||
* would be covered by <b>b</b>, so that a,b is redundant. */
|
||||
static int
|
||||
addr_policy_covers(addr_policy_t *a, addr_policy_t *b)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* We can ignore accept/reject, since "accept *:80, reject *:80" reduces
|
||||
* to "accept *:80". */
|
||||
if (a->msk & ~b->msk) {
|
||||
/* There's a wildcard bit in b->msk that's not a wildcard in a. */
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if ((a->addr & a->msk) != (b->addr & a->msk)) {
|
||||
/* There's a fixed bit in a that's set differently in b. */
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return (a->prt_min <= b->prt_min && a->prt_max >= b->prt_max);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Return true iff the address policies <b>a</b> and <b>b</b> intersect,
|
||||
* that is, there exists an address/port that is covered by <b>a</b> that
|
||||
* is also covered by <b>b</b>.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static int
|
||||
addr_policy_intersects(addr_policy_t *a, addr_policy_t *b)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* All the bits we care about are those that are set in both
|
||||
* netmasks. If they are equal in a and b's networkaddresses
|
||||
* then the networks intersect. If there is a difference,
|
||||
* then they do not. */
|
||||
if (((a->addr ^ b->addr) & a->msk & b->msk) != 0)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
if (a->prt_max < b->prt_min || b->prt_max < a->prt_min)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Add the exit policy described by <b>more</b> to <b>policy</b>.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static void
|
||||
append_exit_policy_string(addr_policy_t **policy, const char *more)
|
||||
{
|
||||
config_line_t tmp;
|
||||
|
||||
tmp.key = NULL;
|
||||
tmp.value = (char*) more;
|
||||
tmp.next = NULL;
|
||||
parse_addr_policy(&tmp, policy, -1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int
|
||||
expand_exit_policy_aliases(smartlist_t *entries, int assume_action)
|
||||
{
|
||||
static const char *prefixes[] = {
|
||||
"0.0.0.0/8", "169.254.0.0/16",
|
||||
"127.0.0.0/8", "192.168.0.0/16", "10.0.0.0/8", "172.16.0.0/12",NULL };
|
||||
int i;
|
||||
char *pre=NULL, *post=NULL;
|
||||
int expanded_any = 0;
|
||||
pre = smartlist_join_strings(entries,",",0,NULL);
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < smartlist_len(entries); ++i) {
|
||||
char *v = smartlist_get(entries, i);
|
||||
const char *cp, *ports;
|
||||
const char *action;
|
||||
int prefix_idx;
|
||||
if (!strcasecmpstart(v, "accept")) {
|
||||
action = "accept ";
|
||||
cp = v+strlen("accept");
|
||||
} else if (!strcasecmpstart(v, "reject")) {
|
||||
action = "reject ";
|
||||
cp = v+strlen("reject");
|
||||
} else if (assume_action >= 0) {
|
||||
action = "";
|
||||
cp = v;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
log_warn(LD_CONFIG,"Policy '%s' didn't start with accept or reject.", v);
|
||||
tor_free(pre);
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
cp = eat_whitespace(cp);
|
||||
if (strcmpstart(cp, "private"))
|
||||
continue; /* No need to expand. */
|
||||
cp += strlen("private");
|
||||
cp = eat_whitespace(cp);
|
||||
if (*cp && *cp != ':')
|
||||
continue; /* It wasn't "private" after all. */
|
||||
ports = cp;
|
||||
/* Okay. We're going to replace entries[i] with a bunch of new entries,
|
||||
* in order. */
|
||||
smartlist_del_keeporder(entries, i);
|
||||
for (prefix_idx = 0; prefixes[prefix_idx]; ++prefix_idx) {
|
||||
size_t replacement_len = 16+strlen(prefixes[prefix_idx])+strlen(ports);
|
||||
char *replacement = tor_malloc(replacement_len);
|
||||
tor_snprintf(replacement, replacement_len, "%s%s%s",
|
||||
action, prefixes[prefix_idx], ports);
|
||||
smartlist_insert(entries, i++, replacement);
|
||||
}
|
||||
tor_free(v);
|
||||
expanded_any = 1;
|
||||
--i;
|
||||
}
|
||||
post = smartlist_join_strings(entries,",",0,NULL);
|
||||
if (expanded_any)
|
||||
log_info(LD_CONFIG, "Expanded '%s' to '%s'", pre, post);
|
||||
tor_free(pre);
|
||||
tor_free(post);
|
||||
return expanded_any;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Detect and excise "dead code" from the policy *<b>dest</b>. */
|
||||
static void
|
||||
exit_policy_remove_redundancies(addr_policy_t **dest)
|
||||
{
|
||||
addr_policy_t *ap, *tmp, *victim, *previous;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Step one: find a *:* entry and cut off everything after it. */
|
||||
for (ap=*dest; ap; ap=ap->next) {
|
||||
if (ap->msk == 0 && ap->prt_min <= 1 && ap->prt_max >= 65535) {
|
||||
/* This is a catch-all line -- later lines are unreachable. */
|
||||
if (ap->next) {
|
||||
addr_policy_free(ap->next);
|
||||
ap->next = NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Step two: for every entry, see if there's a redundant entry
|
||||
* later on, and remove it. */
|
||||
for (ap=*dest; ap; ap=ap->next) {
|
||||
tmp=ap;
|
||||
while (tmp) {
|
||||
if (tmp->next && addr_policy_covers(ap, tmp->next)) {
|
||||
log(LOG_INFO, LD_CONFIG, "Removing exit policy %s. It is made "
|
||||
"redundant by %s.", tmp->next->string, ap->string);
|
||||
victim = tmp->next;
|
||||
tmp->next = victim->next;
|
||||
victim->next = NULL;
|
||||
addr_policy_free(victim);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
tmp=tmp->next;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Step three: for every entry A, see if there's an entry B making this one
|
||||
* redundant later on. This is the case if A and B are of the same type
|
||||
* (accept/reject), A is a subset of B, and there is no other entry of
|
||||
* different type in between those two that intersects with A.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Anybody want to doublecheck the logic here? XXX
|
||||
*/
|
||||
ap = *dest;
|
||||
previous = NULL;
|
||||
while (ap) {
|
||||
for (tmp=ap->next; tmp; tmp=tmp->next) {
|
||||
if (ap->policy_type != tmp->policy_type &&
|
||||
addr_policy_intersects(ap, tmp)) {
|
||||
tmp = NULL; /* so that we advance previous and ap */
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (ap->policy_type == tmp->policy_type &&
|
||||
addr_policy_covers(tmp, ap)) {
|
||||
log(LOG_INFO, LD_CONFIG, "Removing exit policy %s. It is made "
|
||||
"redundant by %s.", ap->string, tmp->string);
|
||||
victim = ap;
|
||||
ap = ap->next;
|
||||
|
||||
if (previous) {
|
||||
assert(previous->next == victim);
|
||||
previous->next = victim->next;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
assert(*dest == victim);
|
||||
*dest = victim->next;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
victim->next = NULL;
|
||||
addr_policy_free(victim);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!tmp) {
|
||||
previous = ap;
|
||||
ap = ap->next;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#define DEFAULT_EXIT_POLICY \
|
||||
"reject *:25,reject *:119,reject *:135-139,reject *:445," \
|
||||
"reject *:465,reject *:587,reject *:1214,reject *:4661-4666," \
|
||||
"reject *:6346-6429,reject *:6699,reject *:6881-6999,accept *:*"
|
||||
|
||||
/** Parse the exit policy <b>cfg</b> into the linked list *<b>dest</b>. If
|
||||
* cfg doesn't end in an absolute accept or reject, add the default exit
|
||||
* policy afterwards. If <b>rejectprivate</b> is true, prepend
|
||||
* "reject private:*" to the policy. Return -1 if we can't parse cfg,
|
||||
* else return 0.
|
||||
*
|
||||
*/
|
||||
int
|
||||
policies_parse_exit_policy(config_line_t *cfg, addr_policy_t **dest,
|
||||
int rejectprivate)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (rejectprivate)
|
||||
append_exit_policy_string(dest, "reject private:*");
|
||||
if (parse_addr_policy(cfg, dest, -1))
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
append_exit_policy_string(dest, DEFAULT_EXIT_POLICY);
|
||||
|
||||
exit_policy_remove_redundancies(dest);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Return true iff <b>ri</b> is "useful as an exit node", meaning
|
||||
* it allows exit to at least one /8 address space for at least
|
||||
* one of ports 80, 443, and 6667. */
|
||||
int
|
||||
exit_policy_is_general_exit(addr_policy_t *policy)
|
||||
{
|
||||
static const int ports[] = { 80, 443, 6667 };
|
||||
int n_allowed = 0;
|
||||
int i;
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < 3; ++i) {
|
||||
struct addr_policy_t *p = policy;
|
||||
for ( ; p; p = p->next) {
|
||||
if (p->prt_min > ports[i] || p->prt_max < ports[i])
|
||||
continue; /* Doesn't cover our port. */
|
||||
if ((p->msk & 0x00fffffful) != 0)
|
||||
continue; /* Narrower than a /8. */
|
||||
if ((p->addr & 0xff000000ul) == 0x7f000000ul)
|
||||
continue; /* 127.x */
|
||||
/* We have a match that is at least a /8. */
|
||||
if (p->policy_type == ADDR_POLICY_ACCEPT)
|
||||
++n_allowed;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
return n_allowed > 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Release all storage held by <b>p</b> */
|
||||
void
|
||||
addr_policy_free(addr_policy_t *p)
|
||||
{
|
||||
addr_policy_t *e;
|
||||
|
||||
while (p) {
|
||||
e = p;
|
||||
p = p->next;
|
||||
tor_free(e->string);
|
||||
tor_free(e);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void
|
||||
policies_free_all(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
addr_policy_free(reachable_or_addr_policy);
|
||||
reachable_or_addr_policy = NULL;
|
||||
addr_policy_free(reachable_dir_addr_policy);
|
||||
reachable_dir_addr_policy = NULL;
|
||||
addr_policy_free(socks_policy);
|
||||
socks_policy = NULL;
|
||||
addr_policy_free(dir_policy);
|
||||
dir_policy = NULL;
|
||||
addr_policy_free(authdir_reject_policy);
|
||||
authdir_reject_policy = NULL;
|
||||
addr_policy_free(authdir_invalid_policy);
|
||||
authdir_invalid_policy = NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -722,7 +722,7 @@ router_compare_to_my_exit_policy(connection_t *conn)
|
||||
if (!conn->addr)
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
|
||||
return router_compare_addr_to_addr_policy(conn->addr, conn->port,
|
||||
return compare_addr_to_addr_policy(conn->addr, conn->port,
|
||||
desc_routerinfo->exit_policy) != ADDR_POLICY_ACCEPTED;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -835,8 +835,8 @@ router_rebuild_descriptor(int force)
|
||||
if (options->BandwidthRate > options->MaxAdvertisedBandwidth)
|
||||
ri->bandwidthrate = (int)options->MaxAdvertisedBandwidth;
|
||||
|
||||
config_parse_exit_policy(options->ExitPolicy, &ri->exit_policy,
|
||||
options->ExitPolicyRejectPrivate);
|
||||
policies_parse_exit_policy(options->ExitPolicy, &ri->exit_policy,
|
||||
options->ExitPolicyRejectPrivate);
|
||||
|
||||
if (desc_routerinfo) { /* inherit values */
|
||||
ri->is_valid = desc_routerinfo->is_valid;
|
||||
|
@ -707,7 +707,7 @@ router_find_exact_exit_enclave(const char *address, uint16_t port)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (router->is_running &&
|
||||
router->addr == addr &&
|
||||
router_compare_addr_to_addr_policy(addr, port, router->exit_policy) ==
|
||||
compare_addr_to_addr_policy(addr, port, router->exit_policy) ==
|
||||
ADDR_POLICY_ACCEPTED)
|
||||
return router;
|
||||
});
|
||||
@ -2403,82 +2403,6 @@ update_networkstatus_downloads(time_t now)
|
||||
update_networkstatus_client_downloads(time(NULL));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Decide whether a given addr:port is definitely accepted,
|
||||
* definitely rejected, probably accepted, or probably rejected by a
|
||||
* given policy. If <b>addr</b> is 0, we don't know the IP of the
|
||||
* target address. If <b>port</b> is 0, we don't know the port of the
|
||||
* target address.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* For now, the algorithm is pretty simple: we look for definite and
|
||||
* uncertain matches. The first definite match is what we guess; if
|
||||
* it was preceded by no uncertain matches of the opposite policy,
|
||||
* then the guess is definite; otherwise it is probable. (If we
|
||||
* have a known addr and port, all matches are definite; if we have an
|
||||
* unknown addr/port, any address/port ranges other than "all" are
|
||||
* uncertain.)
|
||||
*
|
||||
* We could do better by assuming that some ranges never match typical
|
||||
* addresses (127.0.0.1, and so on). But we'll try this for now.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
addr_policy_result_t
|
||||
router_compare_addr_to_addr_policy(uint32_t addr, uint16_t port,
|
||||
addr_policy_t *policy)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int maybe_reject = 0;
|
||||
int maybe_accept = 0;
|
||||
int match = 0;
|
||||
int maybe = 0;
|
||||
addr_policy_t *tmpe;
|
||||
|
||||
for (tmpe=policy; tmpe; tmpe=tmpe->next) {
|
||||
maybe = 0;
|
||||
if (!addr) {
|
||||
/* Address is unknown. */
|
||||
if ((port >= tmpe->prt_min && port <= tmpe->prt_max) ||
|
||||
(!port && tmpe->prt_min<=1 && tmpe->prt_max>=65535)) {
|
||||
/* The port definitely matches. */
|
||||
if (tmpe->msk == 0) {
|
||||
match = 1;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
maybe = 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else if (!port) {
|
||||
/* The port maybe matches. */
|
||||
maybe = 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
/* Address is known */
|
||||
if ((addr & tmpe->msk) == (tmpe->addr & tmpe->msk)) {
|
||||
if (port >= tmpe->prt_min && port <= tmpe->prt_max) {
|
||||
/* Exact match for the policy */
|
||||
match = 1;
|
||||
} else if (!port) {
|
||||
maybe = 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (maybe) {
|
||||
if (tmpe->policy_type == ADDR_POLICY_REJECT)
|
||||
maybe_reject = 1;
|
||||
else
|
||||
maybe_accept = 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (match) {
|
||||
if (tmpe->policy_type == ADDR_POLICY_ACCEPT) {
|
||||
/* If we already hit a clause that might trigger a 'reject', than we
|
||||
* can't be sure of this certain 'accept'.*/
|
||||
return maybe_reject ? ADDR_POLICY_PROBABLY_ACCEPTED :
|
||||
ADDR_POLICY_ACCEPTED;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
return maybe_accept ? ADDR_POLICY_PROBABLY_REJECTED :
|
||||
ADDR_POLICY_REJECTED;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* accept all by default. */
|
||||
return maybe_reject ? ADDR_POLICY_PROBABLY_ACCEPTED : ADDR_POLICY_ACCEPTED;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Return 1 if all running sufficiently-stable routers will reject
|
||||
* addr:port, return 0 if any might accept it. */
|
||||
int
|
||||
@ -2492,7 +2416,7 @@ router_exit_policy_all_routers_reject(uint32_t addr, uint16_t port,
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (router->is_running &&
|
||||
!router_is_unreliable(router, need_uptime, 0, 0)) {
|
||||
r = router_compare_addr_to_addr_policy(addr, port, router->exit_policy);
|
||||
r = compare_addr_to_addr_policy(addr, port, router->exit_policy);
|
||||
if (r != ADDR_POLICY_REJECTED && r != ADDR_POLICY_PROBABLY_REJECTED)
|
||||
return 0; /* this one could be ok. good enough. */
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -2505,7 +2429,7 @@ router_exit_policy_all_routers_reject(uint32_t addr, uint16_t port,
|
||||
int
|
||||
router_exit_policy_rejects_all(routerinfo_t *router)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return router_compare_addr_to_addr_policy(0, 0, router->exit_policy)
|
||||
return compare_addr_to_addr_policy(0, 0, router->exit_policy)
|
||||
== ADDR_POLICY_REJECTED;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -3691,7 +3615,7 @@ router_differences_are_cosmetic(routerinfo_t *r1, routerinfo_t *r2)
|
||||
(r1->contact_info && r2->contact_info &&
|
||||
strcasecmp(r1->contact_info, r2->contact_info)) ||
|
||||
r1->is_hibernating != r2->is_hibernating ||
|
||||
config_cmp_addr_policies(r1->exit_policy, r2->exit_policy))
|
||||
cmp_addr_policies(r1->exit_policy, r2->exit_policy))
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
if ((r1->declared_family == NULL) != (r2->declared_family == NULL))
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
@ -1258,7 +1258,7 @@ networkstatus_parse_from_string(const char *s)
|
||||
return ns;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Parse the exit policy in the string <b>s</b> and return it. If
|
||||
/** Parse the addr policy in the string <b>s</b> and return it. If
|
||||
* assume_action is nonnegative, then insert its action (ADDR_POLICY_ACCEPT or
|
||||
* ADDR_POLICY_REJECT) for items that specify no action.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@ -1290,7 +1290,7 @@ router_parse_addr_policy_from_string(const char *s, int assume_action)
|
||||
}
|
||||
tok = get_next_token(&cp, RTR);
|
||||
if (tok->tp == _ERR) {
|
||||
log_warn(LD_DIR, "Error reading exit policy: %s", tok->error);
|
||||
log_warn(LD_DIR, "Error reading address policy: %s", tok->error);
|
||||
goto err;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (tok->tp != K_ACCEPT && tok->tp != K_REJECT) {
|
||||
@ -1298,7 +1298,7 @@ router_parse_addr_policy_from_string(const char *s, int assume_action)
|
||||
goto err;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Now that we've gotten an exit policy, add it to the router. */
|
||||
/* Now that we've gotten an addr policy, add it to the router. */
|
||||
r = router_parse_addr_policy(tok);
|
||||
goto done;
|
||||
err:
|
||||
|
@ -1453,11 +1453,11 @@ test_exit_policies(void)
|
||||
|
||||
// test_assert(exit_policy_implicitly_allows_local_networks(policy, 0));
|
||||
test_assert(ADDR_POLICY_ACCEPTED ==
|
||||
router_compare_addr_to_addr_policy(0x01020304u, 2, policy));
|
||||
compare_addr_to_addr_policy(0x01020304u, 2, policy));
|
||||
test_assert(ADDR_POLICY_PROBABLY_ACCEPTED ==
|
||||
router_compare_addr_to_addr_policy(0, 2, policy));
|
||||
compare_addr_to_addr_policy(0, 2, policy));
|
||||
test_assert(ADDR_POLICY_REJECTED ==
|
||||
router_compare_addr_to_addr_policy(0xc0a80102, 2, policy));
|
||||
compare_addr_to_addr_policy(0xc0a80102, 2, policy));
|
||||
|
||||
addr_policy_free(policy);
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user