mirror of
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/tor.git
synced 2024-11-11 05:33:47 +01:00
Disable consensus methods before 25.
Consensus method 25 is the oldest one supported by any stable version of 0.2.9, which is our current most-recent LTS. Thus, by proposal 290, they should be removed. This commit does not actually remove the code to implement these methods: it only makes it so authorities will no longer support them. I'll remove the backend code for them in later commits.
This commit is contained in:
parent
e58555135a
commit
69347f48e0
@ -3951,13 +3951,7 @@ static const struct consensus_method_range_t {
|
||||
int low;
|
||||
int high;
|
||||
} microdesc_consensus_methods[] = {
|
||||
{MIN_SUPPORTED_CONSENSUS_METHOD, MIN_METHOD_FOR_A_LINES - 1},
|
||||
{MIN_METHOD_FOR_A_LINES, MIN_METHOD_FOR_P6_LINES - 1},
|
||||
{MIN_METHOD_FOR_P6_LINES, MIN_METHOD_FOR_NTOR_KEY - 1},
|
||||
{MIN_METHOD_FOR_NTOR_KEY, MIN_METHOD_FOR_ID_HASH_IN_MD - 1},
|
||||
{MIN_METHOD_FOR_ID_HASH_IN_MD, MIN_METHOD_FOR_ED25519_ID_IN_MD - 1},
|
||||
{MIN_METHOD_FOR_ED25519_ID_IN_MD,
|
||||
MIN_METHOD_FOR_NO_A_LINES_IN_MICRODESC - 1},
|
||||
{MIN_SUPPORTED_CONSENSUS_METHOD, MIN_METHOD_FOR_NO_A_LINES_IN_MICRODESC - 1},
|
||||
{MIN_METHOD_FOR_NO_A_LINES_IN_MICRODESC, MAX_SUPPORTED_CONSENSUS_METHOD},
|
||||
{-1, -1}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
@ -56,7 +56,7 @@
|
||||
#define ROUTERSTATUS_FORMAT_NO_CONSENSUS_METHOD 0
|
||||
|
||||
/** The lowest consensus method that we currently support. */
|
||||
#define MIN_SUPPORTED_CONSENSUS_METHOD 13
|
||||
#define MIN_SUPPORTED_CONSENSUS_METHOD 25
|
||||
|
||||
/** The highest consensus method that we currently support. */
|
||||
#define MAX_SUPPORTED_CONSENSUS_METHOD 28
|
||||
|
@ -2917,8 +2917,9 @@ gen_routerstatus_for_umbw(int idx, time_t now)
|
||||
rs->addr = 0x99008801;
|
||||
rs->or_port = 443;
|
||||
rs->dir_port = 8000;
|
||||
/* all flags but running cleared */
|
||||
/* all flags but running and valid cleared */
|
||||
rs->is_flagged_running = 1;
|
||||
rs->is_valid = 1;
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* This one has measured bandwidth below the clip cutoff, and
|
||||
* so shouldn't be clipped; we'll have to test that it isn't
|
||||
@ -2991,8 +2992,9 @@ gen_routerstatus_for_umbw(int idx, time_t now)
|
||||
rs->addr = 0xC0000203;
|
||||
rs->or_port = 500;
|
||||
rs->dir_port = 1999;
|
||||
/* all flags but running cleared */
|
||||
/* all flags but running and valid cleared */
|
||||
rs->is_flagged_running = 1;
|
||||
rs->is_valid = 1;
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* This one has unmeasured bandwidth below the clip cutoff, and
|
||||
* so shouldn't be clipped; we'll have to test that it isn't
|
||||
@ -3014,7 +3016,7 @@ gen_routerstatus_for_umbw(int idx, time_t now)
|
||||
if (vrs) {
|
||||
vrs->microdesc = tor_malloc_zero(sizeof(vote_microdesc_hash_t));
|
||||
tor_asprintf(&vrs->microdesc->microdesc_hash_line,
|
||||
"m 9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17 "
|
||||
"m 25,26,27,28 "
|
||||
"sha256=xyzajkldsdsajdadlsdjaslsdksdjlsdjsdaskdaaa%d\n",
|
||||
idx);
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -3040,7 +3042,7 @@ vote_tweaks_for_umbw(networkstatus_t *v, int voter, time_t now)
|
||||
smartlist_clear(v->supported_methods);
|
||||
/* Method 17 is MIN_METHOD_TO_CLIP_UNMEASURED_BW_KB */
|
||||
smartlist_split_string(v->supported_methods,
|
||||
"1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17",
|
||||
"25 26 27 28",
|
||||
NULL, 0, -1);
|
||||
/* If we're using a non-default clip bandwidth, add it to net_params */
|
||||
if (alternate_clip_bw > 0) {
|
||||
@ -3202,9 +3204,9 @@ test_routerstatus_for_umbw(routerstatus_t *rs, time_t now)
|
||||
tt_assert(!rs->is_fast);
|
||||
tt_assert(!rs->is_possible_guard);
|
||||
tt_assert(!rs->is_stable);
|
||||
/* (If it wasn't running it wouldn't be here) */
|
||||
/* (If it wasn't running and valid it wouldn't be here) */
|
||||
tt_assert(rs->is_flagged_running);
|
||||
tt_assert(!rs->is_valid);
|
||||
tt_assert(rs->is_valid);
|
||||
tt_assert(!rs->is_named);
|
||||
/* This one should have measured bandwidth below the clip cutoff */
|
||||
tt_assert(rs->has_bandwidth);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user