nihilist/tor
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/tor.git synced 2024-11-28 14:23:30 +01:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Merge remote-tracking branch 'public/bug8235-diagnostic-rebased' into maint-0.2.4

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Nick Mathewson 2013-04-03 09:35:57 -04:00
commit 5efe506767
3 changed files with 69 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

5
changes/bug8235-diagnosing Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
o Minor features (diagnostic)
- If the state file's path bias counts are invalid (presumably from a
buggy tor prior to 0.2.4.10-alpha), make them correct.
- Add additional checks and log messages to the scaling of Path Bias
counts, in case there still are remaining issues with scaling.

34
src/or/circuitbuild.c
View File

@ -1734,6 +1734,13 @@ pathbias_count_use_success(origin_circuit_t *circ)
guard->use_successes++;
entry_guards_changed();
if (guard->use_attempts < guard->use_successes) {
log_notice(LD_BUG, "Unexpectedly high use successes counts (%f/%f) "
"for guard %s=%s",
guard->use_successes, guard->use_attempts,
guard->nickname, hex_str(guard->identity, DIGEST_LEN));
}
log_debug(LD_CIRC,
"Marked circuit %d (%f/%f) as used successfully for guard "
"%s ($%s).",
@ -2481,6 +2488,9 @@ pathbias_scale_close_rates(entry_guard_t *guard)
int opened_built = pathbias_count_circs_in_states(guard,
PATH_STATE_BUILD_SUCCEEDED,
PATH_STATE_USE_FAILED);
/* Verify that the counts are sane before and after scaling */
int counts_are_sane = (guard->circ_attempts >= guard->circ_successes);
guard->circ_attempts -= opened_attempts;
guard->circ_successes -= opened_built;
@ -2502,6 +2512,16 @@ pathbias_scale_close_rates(entry_guard_t *guard)
guard->circ_successes, guard->successful_circuits_closed,
guard->circ_attempts, opened_built, opened_attempts,
guard->nickname, hex_str(guard->identity, DIGEST_LEN));
/* Have the counts just become invalid by this scaling attempt? */
if (counts_are_sane && guard->circ_attempts < guard->circ_successes) {
log_notice(LD_BUG,
"Scaling has mangled pathbias counts to %f/%f (%d/%d open) "
"for guard %s ($%s)",
guard->circ_successes, guard->circ_attempts, opened_built,
opened_attempts, guard->nickname,
hex_str(guard->identity, DIGEST_LEN));
}
}
}
@ -2524,6 +2544,9 @@ pathbias_scale_use_rates(entry_guard_t *guard)
double scale_ratio = pathbias_get_scale_ratio(options);
int opened_attempts = pathbias_count_circs_in_states(guard,
PATH_STATE_USE_ATTEMPTED, PATH_STATE_USE_SUCCEEDED);
/* Verify that the counts are sane before and after scaling */
int counts_are_sane = (guard->use_attempts >= guard->use_successes);
guard->use_attempts -= opened_attempts;
guard->use_attempts *= scale_ratio;
@ -2535,6 +2558,17 @@ pathbias_scale_use_rates(entry_guard_t *guard)
"Scaled pathbias use counts to %f/%f (%d open) for guard %s ($%s)",
guard->use_successes, guard->use_attempts, opened_attempts,
guard->nickname, hex_str(guard->identity, DIGEST_LEN));
/* Have the counts just become invalid by this scaling attempt? */
if (counts_are_sane && guard->use_attempts < guard->use_successes) {
log_notice(LD_BUG,
"Scaling has mangled pathbias usage counts to %f/%f "
"(%d open) for guard %s ($%s)",
guard->circ_successes, guard->circ_attempts,
opened_attempts, guard->nickname,
hex_str(guard->identity, DIGEST_LEN));
}
entry_guards_changed();
}
}

30
src/or/entrynodes.c
View File

@ -1211,6 +1211,21 @@ entry_guards_parse_state(or_state_t *state, int set, char **msg)
continue;
}
if (use_cnt < success_cnt) {
int severity = LOG_INFO;
/* If this state file was written by a Tor that would have
* already fixed it, then the overcounting bug is still there.. */
if (tor_version_as_new_as(state_version, "0.2.4.12-alpha")) {
severity = LOG_NOTICE;
}
log_fn(severity, LD_BUG,
"State file contains unexpectedly high usage success "
"counts %lf/%lf for Guard %s ($%s)",
success_cnt, use_cnt,
node->nickname, hex_str(node->identity, DIGEST_LEN));
success_cnt = use_cnt;
}
node->use_attempts = use_cnt;
node->use_successes = success_cnt;
@ -1261,6 +1276,21 @@ entry_guards_parse_state(or_state_t *state, int set, char **msg)
unusable = 0;
}
if (hop_cnt < success_cnt) {
int severity = LOG_INFO;
/* If this state file was written by a Tor that would have
* already fixed it, then the overcounting bug is still there.. */
if (tor_version_as_new_as(state_version, "0.2.4.12-alpha")) {
severity = LOG_NOTICE;
}
log_fn(severity, LD_BUG,
"State file contains unexpectedly high success counts "
"%lf/%lf for Guard %s ($%s)",
success_cnt, hop_cnt,
node->nickname, hex_str(node->identity, DIGEST_LEN));
success_cnt = hop_cnt;
}
node->circ_attempts = hop_cnt;
node->circ_successes = success_cnt;