mirror of
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/tor.git
synced 2024-11-24 12:23:32 +01:00
We put bw info directory into the consensus, also versions are already there and protocol versions are not currently required
svn:r16423
This commit is contained in:
parent
bd1c8f526e
commit
59439c9d5b
@ -119,28 +119,19 @@ Status: Draft
|
||||
to the "r", "s", and "v" lines that already exist. This line
|
||||
will convey weight information to clients.
|
||||
|
||||
"w Exit=41 Guard=94 Middle=543 ..."
|
||||
"w Bandwidth=193671"
|
||||
|
||||
It starts with the letter w and then contains any number of Key=Value
|
||||
pairs. Values will be non-negative integers. Clients will pick
|
||||
routers with a propability proportional to the number for the intended
|
||||
purpose.
|
||||
The bandwidth number is the lesser of observed bandwidth and bandwidth
|
||||
rate limit from the server descriptor that the "r" line referenced by
|
||||
digest (1st and 3rd field of the bandwidth line in the descriptor).
|
||||
|
||||
Clients MUST accept sums of all weights for a given purpose over all
|
||||
routers in a consensus up to UINT64_max.
|
||||
|
||||
[XXX how do we arrive at a consensus weight?
|
||||
option a) Perhaps the vote could contain the node's bandwidth, and
|
||||
this could be used to calculate the weights? It's
|
||||
necessary that the consensus remain a deterministic
|
||||
function of the votes.
|
||||
option b) Every voter assigns weights for each of the purposes
|
||||
(Exit, Guard, ..) so that their total sum is some constant
|
||||
X. When building a consensus we take the median for each
|
||||
purpose for each router.
|
||||
|
||||
Option a has the disadvantage that if we want to tweak the weighting
|
||||
we have to make a new consensus-method]
|
||||
The bandwidth item is added as another item in the router tuple
|
||||
described in dir-spec section 3.4:
|
||||
| * Two router entries are "the same" if they have the same
|
||||
| <descriptor digest, published time, nickname, IP, ports> tuple.
|
||||
| We choose the tuple for a given router as whichever tuple appears
|
||||
| for that router in the most votes. We break ties in favor of
|
||||
| the more recently published.
|
||||
|
||||
3.2 Fetching descriptors on demand
|
||||
|
||||
@ -198,14 +189,15 @@ Status: Draft
|
||||
|
||||
3.3 Protocol versions
|
||||
|
||||
[XXX: find out where we need "opt protocols Link 1 2 Circuit 1"
|
||||
information described in 2.3 above. If we need it, it might have
|
||||
to go into the consensus document.]
|
||||
Server descriptors contain optional information of supported
|
||||
link-level and circuit-level protocols in the form of
|
||||
"opt protocols Link 1 2 Circuit 1". These are not currently needed
|
||||
and will probably eventually move into the "v" (version) line in
|
||||
the consensus. This proposal does not deal with them.
|
||||
|
||||
[XXX: Similarly find out where we need the version number of a
|
||||
remote tor server. This information is in the consensus, but
|
||||
maybe we use it in some place where having it signed by the
|
||||
server in question is really important?]
|
||||
Similarly a server descriptor contains the version number of
|
||||
a Tor node. This information is already present in the consensus
|
||||
and is thus available to all clients immediately.
|
||||
|
||||
3.4 Exit selection
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user