so which is it? TIME_MAX or INT_MAX? pick INT_MAX for now.

svn:r17772
This commit is contained in:
Roger Dingledine 2008-12-25 15:42:03 +00:00
parent a12c3f2c86
commit 4ff04fda77

View File

@ -3332,20 +3332,20 @@ download_status_increment_failure(download_status_t *dls, int status_code,
if (dls->n_download_failures < schedule_len)
increment = schedule[dls->n_download_failures];
else if (dls->n_download_failures == IMPOSSIBLE_TO_DOWNLOAD)
increment = TIME_MAX;
increment = INT_MAX;
else
increment = schedule[schedule_len-1];
if (increment < INT_MAX)
dls->next_attempt_at = now+increment;
else
dls->next_attempt_at = TIME_MAX;
dls->next_attempt_at = INT_MAX;
if (item) {
if (dls->next_attempt_at == 0)
log_debug(LD_DIR, "%s failed %d time(s); I'll try again immediately.",
item, (int)dls->n_download_failures);
else if (dls->next_attempt_at < TIME_MAX)
else if (dls->next_attempt_at < INT_MAX)
log_debug(LD_DIR, "%s failed %d time(s); I'll try again in %d seconds.",
item, (int)dls->n_download_failures,
(int)(dls->next_attempt_at-now));