mirror of
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/tor.git
synced 2024-11-14 07:03:44 +01:00
bugfix: we were automatically condemning an exit node (concluding
its advertised exit policy is different from its real one) as soon as it refused any requests. After fixing that bug, another bug appeared: we would try the same server again and again, since once we learned an IP address for a hostname, we still kept think of it as the hostname. now pass it to the remapper before trying to reattach. svn:r4962
This commit is contained in:
parent
a60345a2c5
commit
42f752a0a5
@ -657,13 +657,16 @@ connection_edge_process_end_not_open(
|
|||||||
/* check if he *ought* to have allowed it */
|
/* check if he *ought* to have allowed it */
|
||||||
if (exitrouter &&
|
if (exitrouter &&
|
||||||
(rh->length < 5 ||
|
(rh->length < 5 ||
|
||||||
(!tor_inet_aton(conn->socks_request->address, &in) &&
|
(tor_inet_aton(conn->socks_request->address, &in) &&
|
||||||
!conn->chosen_exit_name))) {
|
!conn->chosen_exit_name))) {
|
||||||
log_fn(LOG_NOTICE,"Exitrouter '%s' seems to be more restrictive than its exit policy. Not using this router as exit for now.", exitrouter->nickname);
|
log_fn(LOG_NOTICE,"Exitrouter '%s' seems to be more restrictive than its exit policy. Not using this router as exit for now.", exitrouter->nickname);
|
||||||
addr_policy_free(exitrouter->exit_policy);
|
addr_policy_free(exitrouter->exit_policy);
|
||||||
exitrouter->exit_policy =
|
exitrouter->exit_policy =
|
||||||
router_parse_addr_policy_from_string("reject *:*", -1);
|
router_parse_addr_policy_from_string("reject *:*", -1);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
/* rewrite it to an IP if we learned one. */
|
||||||
|
addressmap_rewrite(conn->socks_request->address,
|
||||||
|
sizeof(conn->socks_request->address));
|
||||||
if (connection_ap_detach_retriable(conn, circ) >= 0)
|
if (connection_ap_detach_retriable(conn, circ) >= 0)
|
||||||
return 0;
|
return 0;
|
||||||
/* else, conn will get closed below */
|
/* else, conn will get closed below */
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user