holding until flush was borked

we were never writing anything when hold_open_until_flushed was set,
since conn_write returns early if marked_for_conn is set.

seems a bit better now.


svn:r1214
This commit is contained in:
Roger Dingledine 2004-03-03 08:46:18 +00:00
parent 6022bfea11
commit 419a672222
3 changed files with 39 additions and 31 deletions

View File

@ -226,6 +226,7 @@ void connection_expire_held_open(void)
if (conn->hold_open_until_flushed) {
assert(conn->marked_for_close);
if (now - conn->timestamp_lastwritten >= 15) {
log_fn(LOG_WARN,"Giving up on marked_for_close conn that's been flushing for 15s (fd %d, type %d, state %d).", conn->s, conn->type, conn->state);
conn->hold_open_until_flushed = 0;
}
}

View File

@ -58,6 +58,8 @@ int connection_edge_process_inbuf(connection_t *conn) {
/* eof reached, kill it. */
log_fn(LOG_INFO,"conn (fd %d) reached eof. Closing.", conn->s);
connection_mark_for_close(conn, END_STREAM_REASON_DONE);
conn->hold_open_until_flushed = 1; /* just because we shouldn't read
doesn't mean we shouldn't write */
return 0;
#endif
}

View File

@ -205,9 +205,9 @@ static void conn_write(int i) {
return; /* this conn doesn't want to write */
conn = connection_array[i];
log_fn(LOG_DEBUG,"socket %d wants to write.",conn->s);
if (conn->marked_for_close)
return;
log_fn(LOG_DEBUG,"socket %d wants to write.",conn->s);
assert_connection_ok(conn, time(NULL));
@ -225,33 +225,39 @@ static void conn_write(int i) {
static void conn_close_if_marked(int i) {
connection_t *conn;
int retval;
conn = connection_array[i];
assert_connection_ok(conn, time(NULL));
if(conn->marked_for_close) {
if (conn->hold_open_until_flushed && conn->s >= 0 &&
connection_wants_to_flush(conn))
return;
if(!conn->marked_for_close)
return; /* nothing to see here, move along */
log_fn(LOG_INFO,"Cleaning up connection (fd %d).",conn->s);
if(conn->s >= 0 && connection_wants_to_flush(conn)) {
/* -1 means it's an incomplete edge connection, or that the socket
* has already been closed as unflushable. */
/* FIXME there's got to be a better way to check for this -- and make other checks? */
if(!conn->hold_open_until_flushed)
log_fn(LOG_WARN,
"Conn (fd %d, type %d, state %d) marked for close, but wants to flush %d bytes. "
"Marked at %s:%d",
"Conn (fd %d, type %d, state %d) marked, but wants to flush %d bytes. "
"(Marked at %s:%d)",
conn->s, conn->type, conn->state,
conn->outbuf_flushlen, conn->marked_for_close_file, conn->marked_for_close);
/* XXX change the above to 'warn', and go through and fix all the complaints */
if(connection_speaks_cells(conn)) {
if(conn->state == OR_CONN_STATE_OPEN) {
flush_buf_tls(conn->tls, conn->outbuf, &conn->outbuf_flushlen);
}
retval = flush_buf_tls(conn->tls, conn->outbuf, &conn->outbuf_flushlen);
/* XXX actually, some non-zero results are maybe ok. which ones? */
} else
retval = -1;
} else {
flush_buf(conn->s, conn->outbuf, &conn->outbuf_flushlen);
retval = flush_buf(conn->s, conn->outbuf, &conn->outbuf_flushlen);
}
if(connection_wants_to_flush(conn) && buf_datalen(conn->outbuf)) {
if(retval == 0 &&
conn->hold_open_until_flushed && connection_wants_to_flush(conn)) {
log_fn(LOG_INFO,"Holding conn (fd %d) open for more flushing.",conn->s);
/* XXX should we reset timestamp_lastwritten here? */
return;
}
if(connection_wants_to_flush(conn)) {
log_fn(LOG_WARN,"Conn (fd %d) still wants to flush. Losing %d bytes!",
conn->s, (int)buf_datalen(conn->outbuf));
}
@ -262,7 +268,6 @@ static void conn_close_if_marked(int i) {
process it too. */
conn_close_if_marked(i);
}
}
}
/* Perform regular maintenance tasks for a single connection. This