mirror of
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/tor.git
synced 2024-11-24 04:13:28 +01:00
connection_or_set_identity_digest(): handle zero ed_id better
It looks like our code actually assumes (by dereferencing it in a log call) that ed_id will _not_ be NULL, but rather will be a bunch of zero bytes. Refactor the code accordingly, and stop using NULL tests on ed_id.
This commit is contained in:
parent
ecbab95998
commit
33bb1c5fca
@ -165,9 +165,6 @@ connection_or_set_identity_digest(or_connection_t *conn,
|
||||
if (conn->chan)
|
||||
chan = TLS_CHAN_TO_BASE(conn->chan);
|
||||
|
||||
if (BUG(ed_id && ed25519_public_key_is_zero(ed_id)))
|
||||
ed_id = NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
log_info(LD_HANDSHAKE, "Set identity digest for %s at %p: %s %s.",
|
||||
connection_describe(TO_CONN(conn)),
|
||||
conn,
|
||||
@ -180,10 +177,12 @@ connection_or_set_identity_digest(or_connection_t *conn,
|
||||
const int rsa_id_was_set = ! tor_digest_is_zero(conn->identity_digest);
|
||||
const int ed_id_was_set =
|
||||
chan && !ed25519_public_key_is_zero(&chan->ed25519_identity);
|
||||
const int new_ed_id_is_set =
|
||||
(ed_id && !ed25519_public_key_is_zero(ed_id));
|
||||
const int rsa_changed =
|
||||
tor_memneq(conn->identity_digest, rsa_digest, DIGEST_LEN);
|
||||
const int ed_changed = (!ed_id_was_set && ed_id) ||
|
||||
(ed_id_was_set && ed_id && chan &&
|
||||
const int ed_changed = bool_neq(ed_id_was_set, new_ed_id_is_set) ||
|
||||
(ed_id_was_set && new_ed_id_is_set && chan &&
|
||||
!ed25519_pubkey_eq(ed_id, &chan->ed25519_identity));
|
||||
|
||||
if (BUG(rsa_changed && rsa_id_was_set))
|
||||
@ -204,8 +203,7 @@ connection_or_set_identity_digest(or_connection_t *conn,
|
||||
memcpy(conn->identity_digest, rsa_digest, DIGEST_LEN);
|
||||
|
||||
/* If we're initializing the IDs to zero, don't add a mapping yet. */
|
||||
if (tor_digest_is_zero(rsa_digest) &&
|
||||
(!ed_id || ed25519_public_key_is_zero(ed_id)))
|
||||
if (tor_digest_is_zero(rsa_digest) && !new_ed_id_is_set)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Deal with channels */
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user