two more policy issues

svn:r3326
This commit is contained in:
Roger Dingledine 2005-01-07 14:01:56 +00:00
parent c1ffbf9b67
commit 31227f0292

View File

@ -90,6 +90,15 @@ snipe them? Takedowns and efnet abuse and wikipedia complaints and irc
networks. Should we allow revocation of anonymity if a threshold of
servers want to?
Image: substantial non-infringing uses. Image is a security parameter,
since it impacts user base and perceived sustainability.
Sustainability. Previous attempts have been commercial which we think
adds a lot of unnecessary complexity and accountability. Freedom didn't
collect enough money to pay its servers; JAP bandwidth is supported by
continued money, and they periodically ask what they will do when it
dries up.
Logging. Making logs not revealing. A happy coincidence that verbose
logging is our #2 performance bottleneck. Is there a way to detect
modified servers, or to have them volunteer the information that they're