From 31227f0292775ad30743a6149145db876e0e172c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Roger Dingledine Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:01:56 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] two more policy issues svn:r3326 --- doc/design-paper/challenges.tex | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/doc/design-paper/challenges.tex b/doc/design-paper/challenges.tex index ac4845312f..62f9aee7c9 100644 --- a/doc/design-paper/challenges.tex +++ b/doc/design-paper/challenges.tex @@ -90,6 +90,15 @@ snipe them? Takedowns and efnet abuse and wikipedia complaints and irc networks. Should we allow revocation of anonymity if a threshold of servers want to? +Image: substantial non-infringing uses. Image is a security parameter, +since it impacts user base and perceived sustainability. + +Sustainability. Previous attempts have been commercial which we think +adds a lot of unnecessary complexity and accountability. Freedom didn't +collect enough money to pay its servers; JAP bandwidth is supported by +continued money, and they periodically ask what they will do when it +dries up. + Logging. Making logs not revealing. A happy coincidence that verbose logging is our #2 performance bottleneck. Is there a way to detect modified servers, or to have them volunteer the information that they're