r12259@catbus: nickm | 2007-03-21 00:12:02 -0400

Incorporate ideas from or-dev discussion.


svn:r9891
This commit is contained in:
Nick Mathewson 2007-03-21 04:12:08 +00:00
parent 09136b1d69
commit 2ceac73fce

View File

@ -234,7 +234,38 @@ Discussion: Reducing round-trips
Discussion: Advertising versions in routerdescs and networkstatuses.
XXXX
In network-statuses:
The networkstatus "v" line now has the format:
"v" IMPLEMENTATION IMPL-VERSION "Link" LINK-VERSION-LIST
Circuit" CIRCUIT-VERSION-LIST NL
LINK-VERSION-LIST and CIRCUIT-VERSION-LIST are comma-separated lists of
supported version numbers. IMPLEMENTATION is the name of the
implementation of the Tor protocol (e.g., "Tor"), and IMPL-VERSION is the
version of the implementation.
Examples:
v Tor 0.2.5.1-alpha Link 0,1,2,3 Circuit 0,2,5
v OtherOR 2000+ Link 3 Circuit 5
Implementations that release independently of the Tor codebase SHOULD NOT
use "Tor" as the value of their IMPLEMENTATION.
Additional fields on the "v" line MUSTbe ignored.
In router descriptors:
The router descriptor should contain a line of the form,
"protocols" "Link" LINK-VERSION-LIST "Circuit" CIRCUIT_VERSION_LIST
Additional fields on the "protocols" line MUST be ignored.
[Versions of Tor before 0.1.2.5-alpha rejected router descriptors with
unrecognized items; the protocols line should be preceded with an "opt"
until these Tors are obsolete.]
Security issues:
@ -244,8 +275,11 @@ Security issues:
version, it will get a disproportionate amount of traffic from clients who
prefer that version. We can mitigate this somewhat as follows:
- Do not have clients prefer any protocol version by default
until that version is widespread.
- Do not have clients prefer any protocol version by default until that
version is widespread. (First introduce the new version to servers,
and have clients admit to using it only when configured to do so for
testing. Then, once many servers are running the new protocol
version, enable its use by default.)
- Do not multiply protocol versions needlessly.