From ee38514cc4372bfb7d01ee96a1110d600a30e061 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sam James Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2022 06:42:59 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] build: fix -Wstrict-prototypes (Clang 16) Clang 16 warns on -Wstrict-prototypes in preparation for C23 which can among other things, lead to some configure tests silently failing/returning the wrong result. Fixes this error: ``` -ignoreme: warning: a function declaration without a prototype is deprecated in all versions of C [-Wstrict-prototypes] +ignoreme: error: a function declaration without a prototype is deprecated in all versions of C [-Werror,-Wstrict-prototypes] main () ``` For more information, see LWN.net [0] or LLVM's Discourse [1], gentoo-dev@ [2], or the (new) c-std-porting mailing list [3]. [0] https://lwn.net/Articles/913505/ [1] https://discourse.llvm.org/t/configure-script-breakage-with-the-new-werror-implicit-function-declaration/65213 [2] https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/dd9f2d3082b8b6f8dfbccb0639e6e240 [3] hosted at lists.linux.dev. Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/879747 Signed-off-by: Sam James --- --- configure.ac | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index 517b1164c5..f26ed14229 100644 --- a/configure.ac +++ b/configure.ac @@ -1982,7 +1982,7 @@ AC_CACHE_CHECK([whether memset(0) sets pointers to NULL], tor_cv_null_is_zero, #ifdef HAVE_STDDEF_H #include #endif -int main () { char *p1,*p2; p1=NULL; memset(&p2,0,sizeof(p2)); +int main (void) { char *p1,*p2; p1=NULL; memset(&p2,0,sizeof(p2)); return memcmp(&p1,&p2,sizeof(char*))?1:0; }]])], [tor_cv_null_is_zero=yes], [tor_cv_null_is_zero=no], @@ -2006,7 +2006,7 @@ AC_CACHE_CHECK([whether memset(0) sets doubles to 0.0], tor_cv_dbl0_is_zero, #ifdef HAVE_STDDEF_H #include #endif -int main () { double d1,d2; d1=0; memset(&d2,0,sizeof(d2)); +int main (void) { double d1,d2; d1=0; memset(&d2,0,sizeof(d2)); return memcmp(&d1,&d2,sizeof(d1))?1:0; }]])], [tor_cv_dbl0_is_zero=yes], [tor_cv_dbl0_is_zero=no], @@ -2031,7 +2031,7 @@ AC_CACHE_CHECK([whether we can malloc(0) safely.], tor_cv_malloc_zero_works, #ifdef HAVE_STDDEF_H #include #endif -int main () { return malloc(0)?0:1; }]])], +int main (void) { return malloc(0)?0:1; }]])], [tor_cv_malloc_zero_works=yes], [tor_cv_malloc_zero_works=no], [tor_cv_malloc_zero_works=cross])]) @@ -2049,7 +2049,7 @@ fi # whether we seem to be in a 2s-complement world. AC_CACHE_CHECK([whether we are using 2s-complement arithmetic], tor_cv_twos_complement, [AC_RUN_IFELSE([AC_LANG_SOURCE( -[[int main () { int problem = ((-99) != (~99)+1); +[[int main (void) { int problem = ((-99) != (~99)+1); return problem ? 1 : 0; }]])], [tor_cv_twos_complement=yes], [tor_cv_twos_complement=no], @@ -2069,7 +2069,7 @@ fi # What does shifting a negative value do? AC_CACHE_CHECK([whether right-shift on negative values does sign-extension], tor_cv_sign_extend, [AC_RUN_IFELSE([AC_LANG_SOURCE( -[[int main () { int okay = (-60 >> 8) == -1; return okay ? 0 : 1; }]])], +[[int main (void) { int okay = (-60 >> 8) == -1; return okay ? 0 : 1; }]])], [tor_cv_sign_extend=yes], [tor_cv_sign_extend=no], [tor_cv_sign_extend=cross])])