From 1bec1b3d37c15ea2329fe5eeeddead446610d33a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nick Mathewson Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 22:34:23 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Better notice for hibernate interval spans; when estimate is 0, start out awake. svn:r2963 --- src/or/hibernate.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/or/hibernate.c b/src/or/hibernate.c index 858e94cff4..6da6e8d55e 100644 --- a/src/or/hibernate.c +++ b/src/or/hibernate.c @@ -78,7 +78,8 @@ static time_t interval_start_time = 0; static time_t interval_end_time = 0; /** How far into the accounting interval should we hibernate? */ static time_t interval_wakeup_time = 0; -/** How much bandwidth do we 'expect' to use per minute? */ +/** How much bandwidth do we 'expect' to use per minute? (0 if we have no + * info from the last period.) */ static uint32_t expected_bandwidth_usage = 0; /** What unit are we using for our accounting? */ static time_unit_t cfg_unit = UNIT_MONTH; @@ -340,17 +341,16 @@ update_expected_bandwidth(void) uint64_t max_configured = (get_options()->BandwidthRate * 60); if (n_seconds_active_in_interval < 1800) { - /* If we haven't gotten enough data last interval, guess that - * we'll be used at our maximum capacity. This is unlikely to be - * so, but it will give us an okay first estimate, and we'll stay - * up until we send Max bytes. Next interval, we'll choose - * our starting time based on how much we sent this interval. + /* If we haven't gotten enough data last interval, set 'expected' + * to 0. This will set our wakeup to the start of the interval. + * Next interval, we'll choose our starting time based on how much + * we sent this interval. */ - expected = max_configured; + expected = 0; } else { used = n_bytes_written_in_interval < n_bytes_read_in_interval ? n_bytes_read_in_interval : n_bytes_written_in_interval; - expected = (used / (n_seconds_active_in_interval / 60)); + expected = used / (n_seconds_active_in_interval / 60); if (expected > max_configured) expected = max_configured; } @@ -423,7 +423,6 @@ accounting_set_wakeup_time(void) int time_in_interval; int time_to_exhaust_bw; int time_to_consider; - int d,h,m; if (! identity_key_is_set()) { if (init_keys() < 0) { @@ -441,17 +440,28 @@ accounting_set_wakeup_time(void) crypto_digest_get_digest(d_env, digest, DIGEST_LEN); crypto_free_digest_env(d_env); - if (expected_bandwidth_usage) - time_to_exhaust_bw = (int) - (get_options()->AccountingMax/expected_bandwidth_usage)*60; - else + if (!expected_bandwidth_usage) { + char buf1[ISO_TIME_LEN+1]; + char buf2[ISO_TIME_LEN+1]; + format_local_iso_time(buf1, interval_start_time); + format_local_iso_time(buf2, interval_end_time); time_to_exhaust_bw = 24*60*60; + interval_wakeup_time = interval_start_time; + log_fn(LOG_NOTICE, "Configured hibernation. This interval begins at %s " + "and ends at %s. We have no prior estimate for bandwidth, so " + "we will start out awake and hibernate when we exhaust our bandwidth.", + buf1, buf2); + return; + } + + time_to_exhaust_bw = (int) + (get_options()->AccountingMax/expected_bandwidth_usage)*60; time_in_interval = interval_end_time - interval_start_time; time_to_consider = time_in_interval - time_to_exhaust_bw; + if (time_to_consider<=0) { interval_wakeup_time = interval_start_time; - d=h=m=0; } else { /* XXX can we simplify this just by picking a random (non-deterministic) * time to be up? If we go down and come up, then we pick a new one. Is @@ -465,6 +475,7 @@ accounting_set_wakeup_time(void) format_iso_time(buf, interval_wakeup_time); } + { char buf1[ISO_TIME_LEN+1]; char buf2[ISO_TIME_LEN+1]; @@ -475,14 +486,18 @@ accounting_set_wakeup_time(void) down_time = interval_end_time; format_local_iso_time(buf1, interval_start_time); format_local_iso_time(buf2, interval_wakeup_time); - format_local_iso_time(buf3, down_time); + format_local_iso_time(buf3, + down_time