Add a missing paren, and the results of an experiment.

svn:r9664
This commit is contained in:
Nick Mathewson 2007-02-27 06:00:11 +00:00
parent 9d714e6258
commit 16f1008d01

View File

@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ const char aes_c_id[] = "$Id$";
# define CPU_IS_X86
#elif (defined(__amd64__) || defined(__amd64) || \
defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__x86_64) || \
defined(_M_X64)
defined(_M_X64))
# define CPU_IS_X86_64
#elif (defined(__ia64__) || defined(__ia64) || defined(_IA64) || \
defined(_M_IA64))
@ -62,14 +62,12 @@ const char aes_c_id[] = "$Id$";
/* OpenSSL 0.9.7 was the first to support AES. It was slower than our
* builtin implementation.
* OpenSSL 0.9.8 added assembly implementations for i386 and ia64.
* Either the i386 stuff isn't used for x86-64, or it isn't faster.
* OpenSSL 0.9.9 (not yet out) has added assembly implementations for
* x86_64 (aka amd64), sparc9, and arm
*
* Note: the "f" at the end of openssl version numbers below means
* "release". */
/* XXXX012 is the i386 implementation faster than our C on x86_64?
* Benchmark. */
# if defined(CPU_IS_X86) || defined(CPU_IS_IA64)
# if OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER >= 0x0090800fL
# define USE_OPENSSL_AES