Merge branch 'bug21415_testfix_030'

This commit is contained in:
Nick Mathewson 2017-03-09 09:25:19 -05:00
commit 118d7018d0
2 changed files with 3 additions and 10 deletions

View File

@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ get_configured_bridge_by_exact_addr_port_digest(const tor_addr_t *addr,
if (digest && tor_memeq(bridge->identity, digest, DIGEST_LEN))
return bridge;
else if (!digest)
else if (!digest || tor_digest_is_zero(bridge->identity))
return bridge;
}
@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ learned_router_identity(const tor_addr_t *addr, uint16_t port,
(void)ed_id;
int learned = 0;
bridge_info_t *bridge =
get_configured_bridge_by_addr_port_digest(addr, port, digest);
get_configured_bridge_by_exact_addr_port_digest(addr, port, digest);
if (bridge && tor_digest_is_zero(bridge->identity)) {
memcpy(bridge->identity, digest, DIGEST_LEN);
learned = 1;

View File

@ -3365,14 +3365,7 @@ guard_selection_have_enough_dir_info_to_build_circuits(guard_selection_t *gs)
* guards in our list, since these are the guards that we typically use for
* circuits. */
num_primary_to_check = get_n_primary_guards_to_use(GUARD_USAGE_TRAFFIC);
/*
We had added this to try to guarantee that we'd not normally try a guard
without a descriptor, even if we didn't use the first guard. But it led
to problems with the chutney bridges+ipv6-min test. A better solution is
needed.
num_primary_to_check++;
*/
num_primary_to_check++;
SMARTLIST_FOREACH_BEGIN(gs->primary_entry_guards, entry_guard_t *, guard) {
entry_guard_consider_retry(guard);