mirror of
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/tor.git
synced 2024-11-23 20:03:31 +01:00
Add getinfo accepted-server-descriptor. Clean spec.
Add a "getinfo status/accepted-server-descriptor" controller command, which is the recommended way for controllers to learn whether our server descriptor has been successfully received by at least on directory authority. Un-recommend good-server-descriptor getinfo and status events until we have a better design for them.
This commit is contained in:
parent
4c297f74f7
commit
075c004095
@ -30,6 +30,13 @@ Changes in version 0.2.1.20 - 2009-??-??
|
||||
overall failure. Bugfix on 0.1.2.6-alpha. Fixes bug 1075. Reported
|
||||
by SwissTorExit.
|
||||
|
||||
o Minor features:
|
||||
- Add a "getinfo status/accepted-server-descriptor" controller
|
||||
command, which is the recommended way for controllers to learn
|
||||
whether our server descriptor has been successfully received by at
|
||||
least on directory authority. Un-recommend good-server-descriptor
|
||||
getinfo and status events until we have a better design for them.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Changes in version 0.2.1.19 - 2009-07-28
|
||||
Tor 0.2.1.19 fixes a major bug with accessing and providing hidden
|
||||
|
@ -558,6 +558,7 @@ $Id$
|
||||
"status/circuit-established"
|
||||
"status/enough-dir-info"
|
||||
"status/good-server-descriptor"
|
||||
"status/accepted-server-descriptor"
|
||||
"status/..."
|
||||
These provide the current internal Tor values for various Tor
|
||||
states. See Section 4.1.10 for explanations. (Only a few of the
|
||||
@ -1488,18 +1489,22 @@ $Id$
|
||||
We successfully uploaded our server descriptor to at least one
|
||||
of the directory authorities, with no complaints.
|
||||
|
||||
{This event could affect the controller's idea of server status, but
|
||||
the controller should not interrupt the user to tell them so.}
|
||||
{Originally, the goal of this event was to declare "every authority
|
||||
has accepted the descriptor, so there will be no complaints
|
||||
about it." But since some authorities might be offline, it's
|
||||
harder to get certainty than we had thought. As such, this event
|
||||
is equivalent to ACCEPTED_SERVER_DESCRIPTOR below. Controllers
|
||||
should just look at ACCEPTED_SERVER_DESCRIPTOR and should ignore
|
||||
this event for now.}
|
||||
|
||||
NAMESERVER_STATUS
|
||||
"NS=addr"
|
||||
"STATUS=" "UP" / "DOWN"
|
||||
"ERR=" message
|
||||
One of our nameservers has changed status.
|
||||
// actually notice
|
||||
|
||||
{This event could affect the controller's idea of server status, but
|
||||
the controller should not interrupt the user to tell them so.}
|
||||
{This event could affect the controller's idea of server status, but
|
||||
the controller should not interrupt the user to tell them so.}
|
||||
|
||||
NAMESERVER_ALL_DOWN
|
||||
All of our nameservers have gone down.
|
||||
|
@ -1789,7 +1789,11 @@ getinfo_helper_events(control_connection_t *control_conn,
|
||||
*answer = tor_strdup(has_completed_circuit ? "1" : "0");
|
||||
} else if (!strcmp(question, "status/enough-dir-info")) {
|
||||
*answer = tor_strdup(router_have_minimum_dir_info() ? "1" : "0");
|
||||
} else if (!strcmp(question, "status/good-server-descriptor")) {
|
||||
} else if (!strcmp(question, "status/good-server-descriptor") ||
|
||||
!strcmp(question, "status/accepted-server-descriptor")) {
|
||||
/* They're equivalent for now, until we can figure out how to make
|
||||
* good-server-descriptor be what we want. See comment in
|
||||
* control-spec.txt. */
|
||||
*answer = tor_strdup(directories_have_accepted_server_descriptor()
|
||||
? "1" : "0");
|
||||
} else if (!strcmp(question, "status/reachability-succeeded/or")) {
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user