mirror of
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/tor.git
synced 2024-11-28 14:23:30 +01:00
r18296@catbus: nickm | 2008-02-20 23:30:11 -0500
Answer one xxx020 item; move 7 other ones to a new "XXX020rc" category: they should get fixed before we cut a release candidate. arma: please review these to see whether you have fixes/answers for any. Please check out the other 14 XXX020s to see if any look critical for the release candidate. svn:r13640
This commit is contained in:
parent
47e6247673
commit
063ced8903
@ -284,8 +284,8 @@ tor_tls_get_error(tor_tls_t *tls, int r, int extra,
|
|||||||
return _TOR_TLS_ZERORETURN;
|
return _TOR_TLS_ZERORETURN;
|
||||||
log(severity, LD_NET, "TLS error: Zero return");
|
log(severity, LD_NET, "TLS error: Zero return");
|
||||||
tls_log_errors(tls, severity, doing);
|
tls_log_errors(tls, severity, doing);
|
||||||
/* XXXX020 Actually, a 'zero return' error has a pretty specific meaning:
|
/* XXXX020rc Actually, a 'zero return' error has a pretty specific
|
||||||
* the connection has been closed cleanly. */
|
* meaning: the connection has been closed cleanly. */
|
||||||
return TOR_TLS_ERROR_MISC;
|
return TOR_TLS_ERROR_MISC;
|
||||||
default:
|
default:
|
||||||
tls_log_errors(tls, severity, doing);
|
tls_log_errors(tls, severity, doing);
|
||||||
|
@ -478,7 +478,8 @@ command_process_versions_cell(var_cell_t *cell, or_connection_t *conn)
|
|||||||
connection_mark_for_close(TO_CONN(conn));
|
connection_mark_for_close(TO_CONN(conn));
|
||||||
return;
|
return;
|
||||||
} else if (highest_supported_version == 1) {
|
} else if (highest_supported_version == 1) {
|
||||||
/*XXXXX020 consider this carefully. */
|
/* Negotiating version 1 makes no sense, since version 1 has no VERSIONS
|
||||||
|
* cells. */
|
||||||
log_fn(LOG_PROTOCOL_WARN, LD_OR,
|
log_fn(LOG_PROTOCOL_WARN, LD_OR,
|
||||||
"Used version negotiation protocol to negotiate a v1 connection. "
|
"Used version negotiation protocol to negotiate a v1 connection. "
|
||||||
"That's crazily non-compliant. Closing connection.");
|
"That's crazily non-compliant. Closing connection.");
|
||||||
|
@ -1860,7 +1860,7 @@ loop_again:
|
|||||||
/* The other side's handle_write will never actually get called, so
|
/* The other side's handle_write will never actually get called, so
|
||||||
* we need to invoke the appropriate callbacks ourself. */
|
* we need to invoke the appropriate callbacks ourself. */
|
||||||
connection_t *linked = conn->linked_conn;
|
connection_t *linked = conn->linked_conn;
|
||||||
/* XXXX020 Do we need to ensure that this stuff is called even if
|
/* XXXX020rc Do we need to ensure that this stuff is called even if
|
||||||
* conn dies in a way that causes us to return -1 earlier? */
|
* conn dies in a way that causes us to return -1 earlier? */
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (n_read) {
|
if (n_read) {
|
||||||
|
@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ directories_have_accepted_server_descriptor(void)
|
|||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
smartlist_t *servers = router_get_trusted_dir_servers();
|
smartlist_t *servers = router_get_trusted_dir_servers();
|
||||||
or_options_t *options = get_options();
|
or_options_t *options = get_options();
|
||||||
/* XXX020 If any authority of the needed type is down, this
|
/* XXX020rc If any authority of the needed type is down, this
|
||||||
* function will never return true. Perhaps we need to be
|
* function will never return true. Perhaps we need to be
|
||||||
* tolerant of down servers? Or even better, should we change
|
* tolerant of down servers? Or even better, should we change
|
||||||
* this so one successful upload is enough? -RD */
|
* this so one successful upload is enough? -RD */
|
||||||
@ -1678,7 +1678,7 @@ connection_dir_client_reached_eof(dir_connection_t *conn)
|
|||||||
int rejected = 0;
|
int rejected = 0;
|
||||||
if (rejected_hdr) {
|
if (rejected_hdr) {
|
||||||
if (!strcmp(rejected_hdr, "Yes")) {
|
if (!strcmp(rejected_hdr, "Yes")) {
|
||||||
/* XXXX020 use this information; be sure to upload next one
|
/* XXXX020rc use this information; be sure to upload next one
|
||||||
* sooner. */
|
* sooner. */
|
||||||
rejected = 1;
|
rejected = 1;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
@ -586,7 +586,7 @@ dns_resolve(edge_connection_t *exitconn)
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
if (!exitconn->_base.marked_for_close) {
|
if (!exitconn->_base.marked_for_close) {
|
||||||
connection_free(TO_CONN(exitconn));
|
connection_free(TO_CONN(exitconn));
|
||||||
//XXX020 ... and we just leak exitconn otherwise? -RD
|
//XXX020rc ... and we just leak exitconn otherwise? -RD
|
||||||
// If it's marked for close, it's on closeable_connection_lst in
|
// If it's marked for close, it's on closeable_connection_lst in
|
||||||
// main.c. If it's on the closeable list, it will get freed from
|
// main.c. If it's on the closeable list, it will get freed from
|
||||||
// main.c. -NM
|
// main.c. -NM
|
||||||
|
@ -500,7 +500,7 @@ conn_write_callback(int fd, short events, void *_conn)
|
|||||||
edge_conn->end_reason = END_STREAM_REASON_INTERNAL;
|
edge_conn->end_reason = END_STREAM_REASON_INTERNAL;
|
||||||
conn->edge_has_sent_end = 1;
|
conn->edge_has_sent_end = 1;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
/* XXX020 do we need a close-immediate here, so we don't try to flush? */
|
/* XXX020rc do we need a close-immediate here, so we don't try to flush? */
|
||||||
connection_mark_for_close(conn);
|
connection_mark_for_close(conn);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
@ -574,7 +574,7 @@ conn_close_if_marked(int i)
|
|||||||
LOG_FN_CONN(conn, (LOG_INFO,LD_NET,
|
LOG_FN_CONN(conn, (LOG_INFO,LD_NET,
|
||||||
"Holding conn (fd %d) open for more flushing.",
|
"Holding conn (fd %d) open for more flushing.",
|
||||||
conn->s));
|
conn->s));
|
||||||
/* XXX020 should we reset timestamp_lastwritten here? */
|
/* XXX020rc should we reset timestamp_lastwritten here? */
|
||||||
return 0;
|
return 0;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
if (connection_wants_to_flush(conn)) {
|
if (connection_wants_to_flush(conn)) {
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user