2017-04-20 17:20:02 +02:00
|
|
|
/* Copyright (c) 2017, The Tor Project, Inc. */
|
|
|
|
/* See LICENSE for licensing information */
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* \file test_hs_common.c
|
|
|
|
* \brief Test hidden service common functionalities.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define HS_COMMON_PRIVATE
|
2017-08-05 22:25:44 +02:00
|
|
|
#define HS_SERVICE_PRIVATE
|
2017-04-20 17:20:02 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include "test.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "test_helpers.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "log_test_helpers.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "hs_test_helpers.h"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include "hs_common.h"
|
2017-08-05 22:25:44 +02:00
|
|
|
#include "hs_service.h"
|
2017-07-18 15:44:03 +02:00
|
|
|
#include "config.h"
|
2017-04-20 17:20:02 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2017-08-03 15:02:51 +02:00
|
|
|
/** Test the validation of HS v3 addresses */
|
2017-04-20 17:20:02 +02:00
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
test_validate_address(void *arg)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int ret;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(void) arg;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Address too short and too long. */
|
|
|
|
setup_full_capture_of_logs(LOG_WARN);
|
|
|
|
ret = hs_address_is_valid("blah");
|
|
|
|
tt_int_op(ret, OP_EQ, 0);
|
|
|
|
expect_log_msg_containing("has an invalid length");
|
|
|
|
teardown_capture_of_logs();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
setup_full_capture_of_logs(LOG_WARN);
|
|
|
|
ret = hs_address_is_valid(
|
|
|
|
"p3xnclpu4mu22dwaurjtsybyqk4xfjmcfz6z62yl24uwmhjatiwnlnadb");
|
|
|
|
tt_int_op(ret, OP_EQ, 0);
|
|
|
|
expect_log_msg_containing("has an invalid length");
|
|
|
|
teardown_capture_of_logs();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Invalid checksum (taken from prop224) */
|
|
|
|
setup_full_capture_of_logs(LOG_WARN);
|
|
|
|
ret = hs_address_is_valid(
|
|
|
|
"l5satjgud6gucryazcyvyvhuxhr74u6ygigiuyixe3a6ysis67ororad");
|
|
|
|
tt_int_op(ret, OP_EQ, 0);
|
|
|
|
expect_log_msg_containing("invalid checksum");
|
|
|
|
teardown_capture_of_logs();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
setup_full_capture_of_logs(LOG_WARN);
|
|
|
|
ret = hs_address_is_valid(
|
|
|
|
"btojiu7nu5y5iwut64eufevogqdw4wmqzugnoluw232r4t3ecsfv37ad");
|
|
|
|
tt_int_op(ret, OP_EQ, 0);
|
|
|
|
expect_log_msg_containing("invalid checksum");
|
|
|
|
teardown_capture_of_logs();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Non base32 decodable string. */
|
|
|
|
setup_full_capture_of_logs(LOG_WARN);
|
|
|
|
ret = hs_address_is_valid(
|
|
|
|
"????????????????????????????????????????????????????????");
|
|
|
|
tt_int_op(ret, OP_EQ, 0);
|
|
|
|
expect_log_msg_containing("can't be decoded");
|
|
|
|
teardown_capture_of_logs();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Valid address. */
|
|
|
|
ret = hs_address_is_valid(
|
|
|
|
"p3xnclpu4mu22dwaurjtsybyqk4xfjmcfz6z62yl24uwmhjatiwnlnad");
|
|
|
|
tt_int_op(ret, OP_EQ, 1);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
done:
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-08-05 22:25:44 +02:00
|
|
|
static int
|
|
|
|
mock_write_str_to_file(const char *path, const char *str, int bin)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
(void)bin;
|
|
|
|
tt_str_op(path, OP_EQ, "/double/five/squared");
|
|
|
|
tt_str_op(str, OP_EQ,
|
|
|
|
"ijbeeqscijbeeqscijbeeqscijbeeqscijbeeqscijbeeqscijbezhid.onion\n");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
done:
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-08-03 15:02:51 +02:00
|
|
|
/** Test building HS v3 onion addresses */
|
2017-04-20 17:20:02 +02:00
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
test_build_address(void *arg)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int ret;
|
|
|
|
char onion_addr[HS_SERVICE_ADDR_LEN_BASE32 + 1];
|
|
|
|
ed25519_public_key_t pubkey;
|
2017-08-05 22:25:44 +02:00
|
|
|
hs_service_t *service = NULL;
|
2017-04-20 17:20:02 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(void) arg;
|
|
|
|
|
2017-08-05 22:25:44 +02:00
|
|
|
MOCK(write_str_to_file, mock_write_str_to_file);
|
|
|
|
|
2017-04-20 17:20:02 +02:00
|
|
|
/* The following has been created with hs_build_address.py script that
|
|
|
|
* follows proposal 224 specification to build an onion address. */
|
|
|
|
static const char *test_addr =
|
|
|
|
"ijbeeqscijbeeqscijbeeqscijbeeqscijbeeqscijbeeqscijbezhid";
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Let's try to build the same onion address that the script can do. Key is
|
|
|
|
* a long set of very random \x42 :). */
|
|
|
|
memset(&pubkey, '\x42', sizeof(pubkey));
|
|
|
|
hs_build_address(&pubkey, HS_VERSION_THREE, onion_addr);
|
|
|
|
tt_str_op(test_addr, OP_EQ, onion_addr);
|
|
|
|
/* Validate that address. */
|
|
|
|
ret = hs_address_is_valid(onion_addr);
|
|
|
|
tt_int_op(ret, OP_EQ, 1);
|
|
|
|
|
2017-08-05 22:25:44 +02:00
|
|
|
service = tor_malloc_zero(sizeof(hs_service_t));
|
|
|
|
memcpy(service->onion_address, onion_addr, sizeof(service->onion_address));
|
|
|
|
tor_asprintf(&service->config.directory_path, "/double/five");
|
|
|
|
ret = write_address_to_file(service, "squared");
|
|
|
|
tt_int_op(ret, OP_EQ, 0);
|
|
|
|
|
2017-04-20 17:20:02 +02:00
|
|
|
done:
|
2017-08-05 22:25:44 +02:00
|
|
|
hs_service_free(service);
|
2017-04-20 17:20:02 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/** Test that our HS time period calculation functions work properly */
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
test_time_period(void *arg)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
(void) arg;
|
|
|
|
uint64_t tn;
|
|
|
|
int retval;
|
2017-08-05 22:43:05 +02:00
|
|
|
time_t fake_time, correct_time, start_time;
|
2017-04-20 17:20:02 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Let's do the example in prop224 section [TIME-PERIODS] */
|
|
|
|
retval = parse_rfc1123_time("Wed, 13 Apr 2016 11:00:00 UTC",
|
|
|
|
&fake_time);
|
|
|
|
tt_int_op(retval, ==, 0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Check that the time period number is right */
|
|
|
|
tn = hs_get_time_period_num(fake_time);
|
|
|
|
tt_u64_op(tn, ==, 16903);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Increase current time to 11:59:59 UTC and check that the time period
|
|
|
|
number is still the same */
|
|
|
|
fake_time += 3599;
|
|
|
|
tn = hs_get_time_period_num(fake_time);
|
|
|
|
tt_u64_op(tn, ==, 16903);
|
|
|
|
|
2017-08-05 22:43:05 +02:00
|
|
|
{ /* Check start time of next time period */
|
|
|
|
retval = parse_rfc1123_time("Wed, 13 Apr 2016 12:00:00 UTC",
|
|
|
|
&correct_time);
|
|
|
|
tt_int_op(retval, ==, 0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
start_time = hs_get_start_time_of_next_time_period(fake_time);
|
|
|
|
tt_int_op(start_time, OP_EQ, correct_time);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-04-20 17:20:02 +02:00
|
|
|
/* Now take time to 12:00:00 UTC and check that the time period rotated */
|
|
|
|
fake_time += 1;
|
|
|
|
tn = hs_get_time_period_num(fake_time);
|
|
|
|
tt_u64_op(tn, ==, 16904);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Now also check our hs_get_next_time_period_num() function */
|
|
|
|
tn = hs_get_next_time_period_num(fake_time);
|
|
|
|
tt_u64_op(tn, ==, 16905);
|
|
|
|
|
2017-08-05 22:43:05 +02:00
|
|
|
{ /* Check start time of next time period again */
|
|
|
|
retval = parse_rfc1123_time("Wed, 14 Apr 2016 12:00:00 UTC",
|
|
|
|
&correct_time);
|
|
|
|
tt_int_op(retval, ==, 0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
start_time = hs_get_start_time_of_next_time_period(fake_time);
|
|
|
|
tt_int_op(start_time, OP_EQ, correct_time);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Now do another sanity check: The time period number at the start of the
|
|
|
|
* next time period, must be the same time period number as the one returned
|
|
|
|
* from hs_get_next_time_period_num() */
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
time_t next_tp_start = hs_get_start_time_of_next_time_period(fake_time);
|
|
|
|
tt_int_op(hs_get_time_period_num(next_tp_start), OP_EQ,
|
|
|
|
hs_get_next_time_period_num(fake_time));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-04-20 17:20:02 +02:00
|
|
|
done:
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-08-03 15:02:51 +02:00
|
|
|
/** Test that we can correctly find the start time of the next time period */
|
2017-07-18 15:44:03 +02:00
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
test_start_time_of_next_time_period(void *arg)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
(void) arg;
|
|
|
|
int retval;
|
|
|
|
time_t fake_time;
|
|
|
|
char tbuf[ISO_TIME_LEN + 1];
|
|
|
|
time_t next_tp_start_time;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Do some basic tests */
|
|
|
|
retval = parse_rfc1123_time("Wed, 13 Apr 2016 11:00:00 UTC",
|
|
|
|
&fake_time);
|
|
|
|
tt_int_op(retval, ==, 0);
|
|
|
|
next_tp_start_time = hs_get_start_time_of_next_time_period(fake_time);
|
|
|
|
/* Compare it with the correct result */
|
|
|
|
format_iso_time(tbuf, next_tp_start_time);
|
|
|
|
tt_str_op("2016-04-13 12:00:00", OP_EQ, tbuf);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Another test with an edge-case time (start of TP) */
|
|
|
|
retval = parse_rfc1123_time("Wed, 13 Apr 2016 12:00:00 UTC",
|
|
|
|
&fake_time);
|
|
|
|
tt_int_op(retval, ==, 0);
|
|
|
|
next_tp_start_time = hs_get_start_time_of_next_time_period(fake_time);
|
|
|
|
format_iso_time(tbuf, next_tp_start_time);
|
|
|
|
tt_str_op("2016-04-14 12:00:00", OP_EQ, tbuf);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
/* Now pretend we are on a testing network and alter the voting schedule to
|
|
|
|
be every 10 seconds. This means that a time period has length 10*24
|
|
|
|
seconds (4 minutes). It also means that we apply a rotational offset of
|
|
|
|
120 seconds to the time period, so that it starts at 00:02:00 instead of
|
|
|
|
00:00:00. */
|
|
|
|
or_options_t *options = get_options_mutable();
|
|
|
|
options->TestingTorNetwork = 1;
|
|
|
|
options->V3AuthVotingInterval = 10;
|
|
|
|
options->TestingV3AuthInitialVotingInterval = 10;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
retval = parse_rfc1123_time("Wed, 13 Apr 2016 00:00:00 UTC",
|
|
|
|
&fake_time);
|
|
|
|
tt_int_op(retval, ==, 0);
|
|
|
|
next_tp_start_time = hs_get_start_time_of_next_time_period(fake_time);
|
|
|
|
/* Compare it with the correct result */
|
|
|
|
format_iso_time(tbuf, next_tp_start_time);
|
|
|
|
tt_str_op("2016-04-13 00:02:00", OP_EQ, tbuf);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
retval = parse_rfc1123_time("Wed, 13 Apr 2016 00:02:00 UTC",
|
|
|
|
&fake_time);
|
|
|
|
tt_int_op(retval, ==, 0);
|
|
|
|
next_tp_start_time = hs_get_start_time_of_next_time_period(fake_time);
|
|
|
|
/* Compare it with the correct result */
|
|
|
|
format_iso_time(tbuf, next_tp_start_time);
|
|
|
|
tt_str_op("2016-04-13 00:06:00", OP_EQ, tbuf);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
done:
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-04-20 17:20:02 +02:00
|
|
|
/** Test that our HS overlap period functions work properly. */
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
test_desc_overlap_period(void *arg)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
(void) arg;
|
|
|
|
int retval;
|
|
|
|
time_t now = time(NULL);
|
|
|
|
networkstatus_t *dummy_consensus = NULL;
|
|
|
|
|
2017-07-18 15:06:12 +02:00
|
|
|
/* First try with a consensus just inside the overlap period */
|
2017-04-20 17:20:02 +02:00
|
|
|
dummy_consensus = tor_malloc_zero(sizeof(networkstatus_t));
|
2017-07-18 15:06:12 +02:00
|
|
|
retval = parse_rfc1123_time("Wed, 13 Apr 2016 00:00:00 UTC",
|
2017-04-20 17:20:02 +02:00
|
|
|
&dummy_consensus->valid_after);
|
|
|
|
tt_int_op(retval, ==, 0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
retval = hs_overlap_mode_is_active(dummy_consensus, now);
|
|
|
|
tt_int_op(retval, ==, 1);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Now increase the valid_after so that it goes to 11:00:00 UTC. Overlap
|
|
|
|
period is still active. */
|
2017-07-18 15:06:12 +02:00
|
|
|
dummy_consensus->valid_after += 3600*11;
|
2017-04-20 17:20:02 +02:00
|
|
|
retval = hs_overlap_mode_is_active(dummy_consensus, now);
|
|
|
|
tt_int_op(retval, ==, 1);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Now increase the valid_after so that it goes to 11:59:59 UTC. Overlap
|
|
|
|
period is still active. */
|
|
|
|
dummy_consensus->valid_after += 3599;
|
|
|
|
retval = hs_overlap_mode_is_active(dummy_consensus, now);
|
|
|
|
tt_int_op(retval, ==, 1);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Now increase the valid_after so that it drifts to noon, and check that
|
|
|
|
overlap mode is not active anymore. */
|
|
|
|
dummy_consensus->valid_after += 1;
|
|
|
|
retval = hs_overlap_mode_is_active(dummy_consensus, now);
|
|
|
|
tt_int_op(retval, ==, 0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Check that overlap mode is also inactive at 23:59:59 UTC */
|
|
|
|
retval = parse_rfc1123_time("Wed, 13 Apr 2016 23:59:59 UTC",
|
|
|
|
&dummy_consensus->valid_after);
|
|
|
|
tt_int_op(retval, ==, 0);
|
|
|
|
retval = hs_overlap_mode_is_active(dummy_consensus, now);
|
|
|
|
tt_int_op(retval, ==, 0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
done:
|
|
|
|
tor_free(dummy_consensus);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-07-18 15:06:12 +02:00
|
|
|
/* Test the overlap period functions on a testnet with altered voting
|
|
|
|
* schedule */
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
test_desc_overlap_period_testnet(void *arg)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int retval;
|
|
|
|
time_t now = approx_time();
|
|
|
|
networkstatus_t *dummy_consensus = NULL;
|
|
|
|
or_options_t *options = get_options_mutable();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(void) arg;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Set the testnet option and a 10-second voting interval */
|
|
|
|
options->TestingTorNetwork = 1;
|
|
|
|
options->V3AuthVotingInterval = 10;
|
|
|
|
options->TestingV3AuthInitialVotingInterval = 10;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dummy_consensus = tor_malloc_zero(sizeof(networkstatus_t));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* A 10-second voting interval means that the lengths of an SRV run and of a
|
|
|
|
* time period are both 10*24 seconds (4 minutes). The SRV gets published at
|
|
|
|
* 00:00:00 and the TP starts at 00:02:00 (rotation offset: 2 mins). Those
|
|
|
|
* two minutes between SRV publish and TP start is the overlap period
|
|
|
|
* window. Let's test it: */
|
|
|
|
retval = parse_rfc1123_time("Wed, 13 Apr 2016 00:00:00 UTC",
|
|
|
|
&dummy_consensus->valid_after);
|
|
|
|
tt_int_op(retval, ==, 0);
|
|
|
|
retval = hs_overlap_mode_is_active(dummy_consensus, now);
|
|
|
|
tt_int_op(retval, ==, 1);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
retval = parse_rfc1123_time("Wed, 13 Apr 2016 00:01:59 UTC",
|
|
|
|
&dummy_consensus->valid_after);
|
|
|
|
tt_int_op(retval, ==, 0);
|
|
|
|
retval = hs_overlap_mode_is_active(dummy_consensus, now);
|
|
|
|
tt_int_op(retval, ==, 1);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
retval = parse_rfc1123_time("Wed, 13 Apr 2016 00:02:00 UTC",
|
|
|
|
&dummy_consensus->valid_after);
|
|
|
|
tt_int_op(retval, ==, 0);
|
|
|
|
retval = hs_overlap_mode_is_active(dummy_consensus, now);
|
|
|
|
tt_int_op(retval, ==, 0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
retval = parse_rfc1123_time("Wed, 13 Apr 2016 00:04:00 UTC",
|
|
|
|
&dummy_consensus->valid_after);
|
|
|
|
tt_int_op(retval, ==, 0);
|
|
|
|
retval = hs_overlap_mode_is_active(dummy_consensus, now);
|
|
|
|
tt_int_op(retval, ==, 1);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
retval = parse_rfc1123_time("Wed, 13 Apr 2016 00:05:59 UTC",
|
|
|
|
&dummy_consensus->valid_after);
|
|
|
|
tt_int_op(retval, ==, 0);
|
|
|
|
retval = hs_overlap_mode_is_active(dummy_consensus, now);
|
|
|
|
tt_int_op(retval, ==, 1);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
retval = parse_rfc1123_time("Wed, 13 Apr 2016 00:06:00 UTC",
|
|
|
|
&dummy_consensus->valid_after);
|
|
|
|
tt_int_op(retval, ==, 0);
|
|
|
|
retval = hs_overlap_mode_is_active(dummy_consensus, now);
|
|
|
|
tt_int_op(retval, ==, 0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
done:
|
|
|
|
tor_free(dummy_consensus);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-04-20 17:20:02 +02:00
|
|
|
struct testcase_t hs_common_tests[] = {
|
|
|
|
{ "build_address", test_build_address, TT_FORK,
|
|
|
|
NULL, NULL },
|
|
|
|
{ "validate_address", test_validate_address, TT_FORK,
|
|
|
|
NULL, NULL },
|
|
|
|
{ "time_period", test_time_period, TT_FORK,
|
|
|
|
NULL, NULL },
|
2017-07-18 15:44:03 +02:00
|
|
|
{ "start_time_of_next_time_period", test_start_time_of_next_time_period,
|
|
|
|
TT_FORK, NULL, NULL },
|
2017-04-20 17:20:02 +02:00
|
|
|
{ "desc_overlap_period", test_desc_overlap_period, TT_FORK,
|
|
|
|
NULL, NULL },
|
2017-07-18 15:06:12 +02:00
|
|
|
{ "desc_overlap_period_testnet", test_desc_overlap_period_testnet, TT_FORK,
|
|
|
|
NULL, NULL },
|
2017-04-20 17:20:02 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
END_OF_TESTCASES
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|