mirror of
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/tor.git
synced 2024-11-24 20:33:31 +01:00
114 lines
4.2 KiB
Markdown
114 lines
4.2 KiB
Markdown
|
# Maintaining Tor
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
This document details the duties and processes on maintaining the Tor code
|
||
|
|
base.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The first section describes who is the current Tor maintainer and what are the
|
||
|
|
responsabilities. Tor has one main single maintainer but does have many
|
||
|
|
committers and subsystem maintainers.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The second third section describes how the **alpha and master** branches are
|
||
|
|
maintained and by whom.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Finally, the last section describes how the **stable** branches are maintained
|
||
|
|
and by whom.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
This document does not cover how Tor is released, please see
|
||
|
|
[ReleasingTor.md](ReleasingTor.md) for that information.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Tor Maintainer
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The current maintainer is Nick Mathewson <nickm@torproject.org>.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The maintainer takes final decisions in terms of engineering, architecture and
|
||
|
|
protocol design. Releasing Tor falls under their responsability.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Alpha and Master Branches
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The Tor repository always has at all time a **master** branch which contains
|
||
|
|
the upstream ongoing development.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
It may also contains a branch for a released feature freezed version which is
|
||
|
|
called the **alpha** branch. The git tag and version number is always
|
||
|
|
postfixed with `-alpha[-dev]`. For example: `tor-0.3.5.0-alpha-dev` or
|
||
|
|
`tor-0.3.5.3-alpha`.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Tor is separated into subsystems and some of those are maintained by other
|
||
|
|
developers than the main maintainer. Those people have commit access to the
|
||
|
|
code base but only commit (in most cases) into the subsystem they maintain.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Upstream merges are restricted to the alpha and master branches. Subsystem
|
||
|
|
maintainers should never push a patch into a stable branch which is the
|
||
|
|
responsability of the [stable branch maintainer](#stable-branches).
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Who
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
In alphabetical order, the following people have upstream commit access and
|
||
|
|
maintain the following subsystems:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
|
||
|
|
* Onion Service (including Shared Random).
|
||
|
|
***keywords:*** *[tor-hs]*
|
||
|
|
* Channels, Circuitmux, Connection, Scheduler.
|
||
|
|
***keywords:*** *[tor-chan, tor-cmux, tor-sched, tor-conn]*
|
||
|
|
* Cell Logic (Handling/Parsing).
|
||
|
|
***keywords:*** *[tor-cell]*
|
||
|
|
* Threading backend.
|
||
|
|
***keywords:*** *[tor-thread]*
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- George Kadianakis <asn@torproject.org>
|
||
|
|
* Onion Service (including Shared Random).
|
||
|
|
***keywords:*** *[tor-hs]*
|
||
|
|
* Guard.
|
||
|
|
***keywords:*** *[tor-guard]*
|
||
|
|
* Pluggable Transport (excluding Bridge networking).
|
||
|
|
***keywords:*** *[tor-pt]*
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Tasks
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
These are the tasks of a subsystem maintainer:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
1. Regurlarly go over `merge_ready` tickets relevant to the related subsystem
|
||
|
|
and for the current alpha or development (master branch) Milestone.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
2. A subsystem maintainer is expected to contribute to any design changes
|
||
|
|
(including proposals) or large patch set about the subsystem.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
3. Leave their ego at the door. Mistakes will be made but they have to be
|
||
|
|
taking care of seriously. Learn and move on quickly.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Merging Policy
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
These are few important items to follow when merging code upstream:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
1. To merge code upstream, the patch must have passed our CI (currently
|
||
|
|
github.com/torproject), have a corresponding ticket and reviewed by
|
||
|
|
**at least** one person that is not the original coder.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Example A: If Alice writes a patch then Bob, a Tor network team member,
|
||
|
|
reviews it and flags it `merge_ready`. Then, the maintainter is required
|
||
|
|
to look at the patch and makes a decision.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Example B: If the maintainer writes a patch then Bob, a Tor network
|
||
|
|
team member, reviews it and flags it `merge_ready`, then the maintainer
|
||
|
|
can merge the code upstream.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
2. Maintainer makes sure the commit message should describe what was fixed
|
||
|
|
and, if it applies, how was it fixed. It should also always refer to
|
||
|
|
the ticket number.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
3. Trivial patches such as comment change, documentation, syntax issues or
|
||
|
|
typos can be merged without a ticket or reviewers.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
4. Tor uses the "merge forward" method that is if a patch applies to the
|
||
|
|
alpha branch, it has to be merged there first and then merged forward
|
||
|
|
into master.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
5. Maintainer should always consult with the network team about any doubts,
|
||
|
|
mis-understandings or unknowns of a patch. Final word will always go to the
|
||
|
|
main Tor maintainer.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Stable Branches
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
(Currently being drafted and reviewed by the network team.)
|